|
|
Post by weaselboy on Dec 24, 2009 18:01:46 GMT -5
Just an interesting note, both the first ppv of this decade (Royal Rumble 2000) and the last ppv of this decade (TLC 2009) ended with the Big Show being thrown over the top rope as the finish of the main event.
give me a cookie!
|
|
odor31
Unicron
The Stunner Collector
Posts: 3,240
|
Post by odor31 on Dec 24, 2009 18:03:31 GMT -5
Nice, too bad he doesn't have a security guard to help him get a rematch this time.
|
|
|
|
Post by weaselboy on Dec 24, 2009 18:05:44 GMT -5
indeed also just to point out only 4 wrestlers can claim to have competed on both pay per views (Triple H, Chris Jericho, Christian and The Big Show)
|
|
|
|
Post by Jedi-El of Tomorrow on Dec 24, 2009 18:06:16 GMT -5
I thought this was going to be about Big Show writing a book.
|
|
Dub H
Crow T. Robot
Captain Pixel: the Game Master
I ❤ Aniki
Posts: 47,850
|
Post by Dub H on Dec 24, 2009 18:40:05 GMT -5
I thought this was going to be about Big Show writing a book. Same here |
|
|
|
Post by weaselboy on Dec 24, 2009 18:43:29 GMT -5
sorry
|
|
|
|
Post by rrm15 on Dec 24, 2009 18:49:41 GMT -5
Its almost poetic.
|
|
|
|
Post by Apricots And A Pear Tree on Dec 24, 2009 19:03:46 GMT -5
Doesn't the decade technically begin in 2001 and end in 2011?
|
|
odor31
Unicron
The Stunner Collector
Posts: 3,240
|
Post by odor31 on Dec 24, 2009 19:09:07 GMT -5
Originally thought it was about a book too...was it supposed to mean he was BOOKed to do such a thing?
|
|
Paco
Hank Scorpio
Posts: 7,145
|
Post by Paco on Dec 24, 2009 19:09:20 GMT -5
Let's not start the decade debate in yet ANOTHER thread.
Hey, we should make a thread for that...
Not it!
|
|
|
|
Post by Paul E. Funk on Dec 24, 2009 19:49:58 GMT -5
I was wondering if he'd won a world title this week and I hadn't heard about it, thinking you were referring to him starting the decade as Champ. Cool little note though.
|
|
|
|
Post by Oh Cry Me a Screwball on Dec 24, 2009 20:41:19 GMT -5
I was wondering if he'd won a world title this week and I hadn't heard about it, thinking you were referring to him starting the decade as Champ. Cool little note though. Actually, he bookends the decade losing titles to Triple H. |
|
|
|
Post by Paul E. Funk on Dec 25, 2009 5:34:23 GMT -5
I was wondering if he'd won a world title this week and I hadn't heard about it, thinking you were referring to him starting the decade as Champ. Cool little note though. Actually, he bookends the decade losing titles to Triple H. That's true twas the Jan 3rd 2000 Raw in which he lost the title, poor guy. |
|
|
|
Post by Cactus Jack on Dec 27, 2009 12:34:06 GMT -5
Originally thought it was about a book too...was it supposed to mean he was BOOKed to do such a thing? No, the OP meant "bookended". |
|
ChitownKnight
El Dandy
Lets go Bears
Posts: 8,223
Member is Online
|
Post by ChitownKnight on Dec 27, 2009 15:24:30 GMT -5
Another intresting fact:
The first Raw of the decade had a WWE title change (HHH def The Big Show)
The last Raw of the decade will most likley have a title change (Cena beating Sheamus?)
|
|
@TenaciousBe
Hank Scorpio
Guess who's back... back again
Posts: 5,659
|
Post by @TenaciousBe on Dec 27, 2009 17:37:42 GMT -5
Let's not start the decade debate in yet ANOTHER thread. Hey, we should make a thread for that... Not it! Well, it IS a legitmate mathematical / scientific fact that there was no year zero. That the first decade was the years 1 through 10, therefore every decade that follows starts with the year ending in 1 and ends with the year ending in 0. There's not really any debate about it. |
|
Sam Punk
Hank Scorpio
Own Nothing, Be Happy
Posts: 6,304
|
Post by Sam Punk on Dec 27, 2009 18:58:32 GMT -5
Doesn't the decade technically begin in 2001 and end in 2011? 2001-2010 |
|
|
|
Post by DSR on Dec 27, 2009 23:31:39 GMT -5
Let's not start the decade debate in yet ANOTHER thread. Hey, we should make a thread for that... Not it! Well, it IS a legitmate mathematical / scientific fact that there was no year zero. That the first decade was the years 1 through 10, therefore every decade that follows starts with the year ending in 1 and ends with the year ending in 0. There's not really any debate about it. And if we referred to them as "The First Decade" "The Second Decade" etc., as we do the centuries, then that would mean something. But a decade is any sequential collection of ten years, so "The 90s" would be 1990 to 1999. 2000 doesn't even have a nine in it, so why would you even bother discussing it as though it does? |
|
