which wwf house show i went to is better and why?

[calmlikeabomb420]

both in 92 in la crosse, wi first one had bulldog v bezerker, tito v m$M, virgil v repo, new foundation v beverly bros, and valetine v skinner, and flair v piper. exciting card i know 2nd one was nat dis v head shrinkers, shawn v marty, miney inc v nasty boyz, undertaker v ramon and bret hart v flair. i figure its obvious 2nd one was better but i wanna see what u crappers think..

[calmlikeabomb420]

i found the old cards..i left a couple off..big time macthes to.. first one had an exciting bout featuring hercules..i forgot who the guy was..some jobber.. 2nd one had max moonv repo man and backlund v papa shango

[calmlikeabomb420]

ugh..i messed up the title..i swear i put house show.. now no1 is gunna take this serious..shit

[Full of IT.]

Nov 9, 2009 15:53:29 GMT -5 calmlikeabomb420 said:

ugh..i messed up the title..i swear i put house show.. now no1 is gunna take this serious..s***

I want you to go home, pack a bag and tell NOBODY where you are. A car will be there shortly there after to take you to the airport. We must also never speak of this again.

Now GO! RUN! Never look back!

[strykerdarksilence]

Well because of the presence of Flair vs Piper I'd say the first was better, but the second is a better card on the whole. 1992 is my favourite year in WWF history and the roster was so stacked you couldn't really go wrong, as evidence by two AWESOME house show lineups.

If it really worries you bro, then you can change the thread title if you modify your opening post, and change the title in there.

[calmlikeabomb420]

i have reached red rooster level.. sweet

[strykerdarksilence]

Rooooster! Rooooster!

[Aceorton]

I like the first show better. First half of '92 > second half of '92. And I'm intrigued by the random thrown-togetherness of Valentine vs. Skinner.