Ragnal
Game Genie
Yanno what they say: All toasters toast El Dandy
Posts: 8,677,836
|
Post by Ragnal on Feb 15, 2010 14:10:32 GMT -5
Anyone else think this match is more likely to happen instead of HBK/Taker or Sheamus/Triple H?
|
|
|
|
Post by xxshoyuweeniexx on Feb 15, 2010 14:16:05 GMT -5
Anyone else think this match is more likely to happen instead of HBK/Taker or Sheamus/Triple H? Pretty much. You don't spend weeks on something like DX breaking up and Shawn going crazy to just forget about it. The biggest reason for this is that I still don't expect to see Sheamus main event f***ing Wrestlemania, and the best he could hope for is a match against Taker. |
|
Zen411
Dennis Stamp
Posts: 3,746
|
Post by Zen411 on Feb 15, 2010 14:19:03 GMT -5
I dont want Sheamus main eventing either. I hope they shove him into a pointless feud or the money in the bank.
I also dont want Taker vs HBK II.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 15, 2010 14:38:56 GMT -5
I would say it's a definite maybe.
|
|
|
|
Post by foreveryoung on Feb 15, 2010 14:41:14 GMT -5
How long to these two have in the spotlight? I mean come on. They have nothing left and prove to accomplish. Why not take roles of the camera and help develop the younger guys into becoming the next big time stars. I mean MEGA STARS!! vince hasnt developed a mega star in years outside of Cena who you can argue is over the with the kiddies but not to every demographic.
You move out Shawn and trips along with taker. You open up more opportunities for guys who are the future.
I get the argument direct towards me all the time of "Oh Vince has created new big time stars, Have you forget about Morrison, Orton, etc)
These guys are stars but they havent reached the next level. They are over but they are nowhere nears as over as they should be And they wont until the void fills and the older guys who are still clinging to their spots get the hell out of the way. How many more WM's does Triple H have to headline?
|
|
|
|
Post by Dr. Bunsen Honeydew on Feb 15, 2010 15:23:49 GMT -5
Anyone else think this match is more likely to happen instead of HBK/Taker or Sheamus/Triple H? Pretty much. You don't spend weeks on something like DX breaking up and Shawn going crazy to just forget about it. The biggest reason for this is that I still don't expect to see Sheamus main event f***ing Wrestlemania, and the best he could hope for is a match against Taker. I disagree. YOu don't spend even more time building to Taker/Shawn and then piss evceryone off by not delivering. They have been going on about Taker/Shawn for over a month. They broke up DX in one episode. Also, It wouldn';t make a lick of sense in kayfabe for Shawn who is obsessed with getting Taker at Mania to all of a sudden forget that and want to fight HHH. |
|
|
|
Post by Supercheese on Feb 15, 2010 15:34:59 GMT -5
How long to these two have in the spotlight? I mean come on. They have nothing left and prove to accomplish. Why not take roles of the camera and help develop the younger guys into becoming the next big time stars. I mean MEGA STARS!! vince hasnt developed a mega star in years outside of Cena who you can argue is over the with the kiddies but not to every demographic. You move out Shawn and trips along with taker. You open up more opportunities for guys who are the future. I get the argument direct towards me all the time of "Oh Vince has created new big time stars, Have you forget about Morrison, Orton, etc) These guys are stars but they havent reached the next level. They are over but they are nowhere nears as over as they should be And they wont until the void fills and the older guys who are still clinging to their spots get the hell out of the way. How many more WM's does Triple H have to headline? Morrison etc are not at the headlining Wrestlemania stage. Orton has been in a title match quite a few times at Mania has he not? Triple H vs HBK will sell more than just about any feud in last couple of years in Wrestling. |
|
|
|
Post by Fade is a CodyCryBaby on Feb 15, 2010 16:00:43 GMT -5
Please for the Love of God, let them go full force on HHH/HBK.
- Gives us a fresh match (At WrestleMania)
- It means no redundant Taker/HBK II
- Means no Sheamus/HHH.
- ^^ Means Cena will probably win the title, making Batista/Cena the headlining match (As it should be)
- Sends Sheamus to MITB.
Perfect.
All but Taker. Who knows who he'll face.
|
|
|
|
Post by a1TheEnigma1a on Feb 15, 2010 16:36:49 GMT -5
I would say it's a definite maybe. Source: Rajah.com |
|
|
|
Post by xxshoyuweeniexx on Feb 15, 2010 16:51:41 GMT -5
Pretty much. You don't spend weeks on something like DX breaking up and Shawn going crazy to just forget about it. The biggest reason for this is that I still don't expect to see Sheamus main event f***ing Wrestlemania, and the best he could hope for is a match against Taker. I disagree. YOu don't spend even more time building to Taker/Shawn and then piss evceryone off by not delivering. They have been going on about Taker/Shawn for over a month. They broke up DX in one episode. Also, It wouldn';t make a lick of sense in kayfabe for Shawn who is obsessed with getting Taker at Mania to all of a sudden forget that and want to fight HHH. Didn't Shawn lose the Rumble, and they kept harping and harping that he's lost his chance to face Taker? Either they'll just screw it and give Shawn Batista's game genie or stick with "his shot is over he lost get over it and he's going crazy and his friend Triple H notices it". |
|
tigericho
Mike the Goon
The Face of Raw
Posts: 31
|
Post by tigericho on Feb 15, 2010 16:53:59 GMT -5
TRIPLE H VS SHAWN MICHEALS
It's bound to happen. If it could build hype like Orton Vs Hunter last year and NOT suck at Mania', you could have a match of the year canidate.
|
|
|
|
Post by i.Sarita.com on Feb 15, 2010 17:03:13 GMT -5
As long as HBK is the heel this time, then I'm all for it. Beats part two of the most overrated WM match of the last decade.
|
|
|
|
Post by American Dragon on Feb 15, 2010 17:10:27 GMT -5
If it does happen, I wonder if they'll reference their 2002/2003 feud.
The WWE's memory doesn't go past 1 month, so I doubt it.
|
|
|
|
Post by a1TheEnigma1a on Feb 15, 2010 17:45:04 GMT -5
Beats part two of the most overrated WM match of the last decade. Epic comment fail. |
|
|
|
Post by Thunderbolt on Feb 15, 2010 19:13:52 GMT -5
1) HBK and Taker both seem to banged up to outdo last year's match.
2) Having HBK/HHH as an undercard match would finally keep HHH out of the goddamn Wrestlemania event for a year where he isn't out with an injury since his Taker match 9 freakin years ago. Of course it'll probably be HHH vs HBK for the title(with HHH going over in the chamber), keeping HHH's annoying stranglehold on WM main events going. Hopefully HBK costs HHH the title at the chamber somehow and they have an undercard match. Hopefully...
|
|
