|
|
Post by nerdinitupagain on Oct 29, 2006 12:36:11 GMT -5
So Kane and Taker are teaming up next week..
I hope this somehow builds towards a WM match between them.
|
|
Crappler El 0 M
Dalek
Never Forgets an Octagon
I'm a good R-Truth.
Posts: 58,479
|
Post by Crappler El 0 M on Oct 29, 2006 13:14:25 GMT -5
Maybe. When they are on the show it seems that it is only a matter of time before they start some kind of relationship or feud. There was a "dream" situation posted last week or a couple of weeks ago about Undertaker's last match should be a Wrestle Mania Hell in a Cell versus Kane. Kane apparently is thinking of retiring; so the consenses was that this match would be a great way to close both of their careers.
|
|
|
|
Post by Twincest on Oct 29, 2006 13:16:36 GMT -5
I read a Kane interview on IGN.com several months ago and he mentioned that he would like to team up with the Undertaker for a while, so maybe he will get what he wants.
I would prefer this to the Undertaker facing every champion and somehow getting screwed out of winning the belt each time.
|
|
|
|
Post by KAMALARAMBO: BOOMSHAKALAKA!!! on Oct 29, 2006 14:41:38 GMT -5
The Undertaker will have to use at least (checks WM 14 for reference) three tomb stones to put Kane away.
|
|
wrasslinmachine
Don Corleone
Savagely protecting the innocent since 1987.
Posts: 1,971
|
Post by wrasslinmachine on Oct 29, 2006 14:56:07 GMT -5
I can see them holding the tag team titles on Smackdown.
|
|
nostradumbass
Tommy Wiseau
The only man to be booked in TNA and not look like a jackass
Posts: 89
|
Post by nostradumbass on Oct 29, 2006 14:58:52 GMT -5
I can see them holding the tag team titles on Smackdown. I don't know. Both of them don't like to slow young talent down. |
|
Reverend BTY
Hank Scorpio
Christian Troy: God's Gift
Posts: 7,206
|
Post by Reverend BTY on Oct 29, 2006 15:43:43 GMT -5
The only time I really liked the Taker/Kane team was early 2001. With Biker Taker and Kane as the silent follower. I mean when Kane kidnapped Steph was great.
Regal- Please, put her down.
Taker- You heard her, bring her down
(Kane about to throw her off balcony)
Regal- NO NO STOP!
|
|
|
|
Post by Tea & Crumpets on Oct 29, 2006 16:14:00 GMT -5
I can see them holding the tag team titles on Smackdown. I don't know. Both of them don't like to slow young talent down. I dunno about Taker, but that's certainly true about Kane. That's why he refused a WHC run. Taker however jobs out rookies most of the time- Kennedy, Orton etc. |
|
|
|
Post by Topher is Human on Oct 29, 2006 16:24:52 GMT -5
I don't know. Both of them don't like to slow young talent down. I dunno about Taker, but that's certainly true about Kane. That's why he refused a WHC run. Taker however jobs out rookies most of the time- Kennedy, Orton etc. He doesn't job to them but he certainly puts them over. Kennedy vs Taker was a very back on fourth match that showed that a rookie can hang with the best. |
|
Dean-o
Grimlock
Haha we're having fun Maggle!
Posts: 13,865 
|
Post by Dean-o on Oct 29, 2006 16:25:05 GMT -5
The Undertaker will have to use at least (checks WM 14 for reference) three tomb stones to put Kane away. That was the old Kane. The Kane we have today can be beaten with a couple clotheslines and a dropkick or two. |
|
Ass Dan
King Koopa
Curious about extra lines
Have you seen me?
Posts: 12,259
|
Post by Ass Dan on Oct 29, 2006 16:38:09 GMT -5
If the Brothers go on a tag-team run, it could help people pay attention the the division. How to get the belts off of the Hooligans, however, is a problem.
|
|
|
|
Post by Nickie James on Oct 29, 2006 21:53:25 GMT -5
I dunno about Taker, but that's certainly true about Kane. That's why he refused a WHC run. Taker however jobs out rookies most of the time- Kennedy, Orton etc. He doesn't job to them but he certainly puts them over. Kennedy vs Taker was a very back on fourth match that showed that a rookie can hang with the best. True. That's why it's such an honor to work with 'Taker. Even the Deadman himself said it, "I will make you famous." And he did! The only thing more thrilling than the Brothers of Destruction being on the same show is having a closure match at 'Mania. |
|
Haulk
Samurai Cop
Posts: 2,298
|
Post by Haulk on Oct 29, 2006 22:26:31 GMT -5
Meh! everyone knows they are not brothers at this point, they should just be friends until retirement now.
|
|
Mr Captain Falcon
Dennis Stamp
So I could write anything in here and it'll be posted?
Posts: 4,689
|
Post by Mr Captain Falcon on Oct 29, 2006 22:29:58 GMT -5
Kane and Taker has been done at mania TWICE. The first time was very memorable due to the fact the the Undertaker had to FIGHT Kane when he was dead against it. The second time was memorable because the Undertaker made his return as the UNDERTAKER, not the biker. The third time should be a HEEL Taker vs. a FACE Kane. That's different, but how to pull it off?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 29, 2006 22:31:02 GMT -5
I dunno about Taker, but that's certainly true about Kane. That's why he refused a WHC run. Taker however jobs out rookies most of the time- Kennedy, Orton etc. He doesn't job to them but he certainly puts them over. Kennedy vs Taker was a very back on fourth match that showed that a rookie can hang with the best. The Undertaker is like Andre the Giant. He'll make everyone he faces look good, but he won't let them beat him. It elevates young guys, and still let's 'Taker keep his mystical status. |
|
|
|
Post by Loki on Oct 30, 2006 4:16:16 GMT -5
I'm not sure I want to see another Taker-Kane feud.
Unless they both retire after an epic match with tons of cheap special effects ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by Tea & Crumpets on Oct 30, 2006 4:47:34 GMT -5
Kane and Taker has been done at mania TWICE. The first time was very memorable due to the fact the the Undertaker had to FIGHT Kane when he was dead against it. The second time was memorable because the Undertaker made his return as the UNDERTAKER, not the biker. The third time should be a HEEL Taker vs. a FACE Kane. That's different, but how to pull it off? I'd like that. It'd be different to any of their other matches, and would be one of Taker's rare WrestleMania appearances as a heel. His first since Mania 15, I believe? If it happened, it should only be in a HIAC match- the first HIAC at a Wrestlemania, and Undertaker's speciality, Kane shold go over to end the Undertaker's Wrestlemania legacy to finish a 9 year storyline, and Taker retires. Kane could then retire like he wants to or continue for a while. |
|
|
|
Post by Topher is Human on Oct 30, 2006 4:58:45 GMT -5
Kane and Taker has been done at mania TWICE. The first time was very memorable due to the fact the the Undertaker had to FIGHT Kane when he was dead against it. The second time was memorable because the Undertaker made his return as the UNDERTAKER, not the biker. The third time should be a HEEL Taker vs. a FACE Kane. That's different, but how to pull it off? I'd like that. It'd be different to any of their other matches, and would be one of Taker's rare WrestleMania appearances as a heel. His first since Mania 15, I believe? If it happened, it should only be in a HIAC match- the first HIAC at a Wrestlemania, and Undertaker's speciality, Kane shold go over to end the Undertaker's Wrestlemania legacy to finish a 9 year storyline, and Taker retires. Kane could then retire like he wants to or continue for a while. You just brought up his match at WM15... then you said if they have a HIAC next year that would be the first at a WM... WM15 was a HIAC wasnt it? |
|
|
|
Post by Tea & Crumpets on Oct 30, 2006 5:07:06 GMT -5
^ Against Big Boss Man? Oh yeah, but....fine then. Say it's the 2nd HIAC at Wrestlemania, and put over the fact that Kane's only ever had 1 singles HIAC before, against Mankind, and 1 tag HIAC, so he's less experienced than Undertaker.
|
|
|
|
Post by perpetualn00b on Oct 30, 2006 15:38:51 GMT -5
I somehow doubt that would happen. I recall reading somewhere that Calloway already offered his streak to Jacobs, who proceeded to refuse the offer. Sad, because in the WWE today only Kane or perhaps Edge would make sense to end the streak. Though, in the end, I think more people would be happy to see Taker retire with the streak intact.
BTW, does anyone know how far in advance this was planned? Was Taker always supposed to have this sort of luck at WM, or did creative eventually just realize they had something and decided to run with it?
|
|
