Creative can't drop the ball on this twice now...

[Doctor Tull-eus S. Venture]

So Austin is our guest host for tonight's RAW. I'll be watching because I'm curious to see what he does.

Assuming that the WWE's PG neutering tool is not used on Austin, and he comes out and drinks beers in the ring, WWE Creative simply has to have Punk and the SES come out and confront him. It's a no-brainer.



But then again, with the PG dial turned up to the max now since we're in an election year, Austin will probably be knocking back O'Douls and Coors Cutter

[wwerules60]

I know it hasn't stopped them before but Punk is on Smackdown and I doubt this will happen as much as I would like to see it.

[parder]

As I said in another thread the outcome is so predictable (not in a good way), and I don't see what good comes out of it other than just killing Punk's heat.

[theryno665]

Chances are if they didn't put Punk in any of the Cheech and Chong segments from a few weeks back, they won't do it with Austin this week. Maybe if it were a three-hour show or something, but I doubt it'll happen tonight.

[BorneAgain]

According to PWInsider.com Mysterio and Punk are at Raw tonight, so the opportunity is there.

[ASYLUMHAUSEN]

Mar 15, 2010 7:21:20 GMT -5 parder said:

As I said in another thread the outcome is so predictable (not in a good way), and I don't see what good comes out of it other than just killing Punk's heat.

the problem is (as much as I would have LIKED to have seen it happen) Punk showing up on the Cheech and Chong show wouldn't have made all that much sense considering they were only implying marijuana use.

Yes, I know it was blatant but it's not like they rolled one up and went to town.

Austin drinking Beer however? That's him. That's his character. Punk being involved in some capacity makes much more sense here because it won't be implied. It'll be blatant (in theory anyway)

Guess we'll see.

[rrm15]

Mar 15, 2010 17:05:00 GMT -5 BorneAgain said:

According to PWInsider.com Mysterio and Punk are at Raw tonight, so the opportunity is there.

Ah yeah!

[Tyfo]

Mar 15, 2010 7:16:01 GMT -5 wwerules60 said:

I know it hasn't stopped them before but Punk is on Smackdown and I doubt this will happen as much as I would like to see it.

During WrestleMania season, everybody just shows up everywhere anyway.

Hell, I don't think they've once even mentioned that the guy holding RAW's WWE Championship is technically a SmackDown guy.

So Punk showing up on RAW can defiantly happen right now.

[forgottensinpwf]

Mar 15, 2010 7:14:36 GMT -5 Doctor Tull-eus S. Venture said:

But then again, with the PG dial turned up to the max now since we're in an election year, Austin will probably be knocking back O'Douls and Coors Cutter

Because drug references and Magicians pulling string out their eyes is so PG.

[Muskrat]

Mar 15, 2010 17:16:49 GMT -5 Tyfo said:

Hell, I don't think they've once even mentioned that the guy holding RAW's WWE Championship is technically a SmackDown guy.

I thought they stated that part of the deal with McMahon was that Batista's contract was moved from SmackDown to Raw when he won the title.

[celticjobber]

I dreamed that Austin no-showed, and they had Miz host instead. And half the crowd got up and walked out of the arena, while Cole got on the mic telling them what a good show it was gonna be.

[Jason]

Punk is booked for Raw tonight with Rey, YES!

[Apricots And A Pear Tree]

I see one of two things, if not both, happening:
1.Punk gets "WHAT"'d to hell and back
2.STUNNER!STUNNER!STUNNER! BAH GAWD!!!!

[Deleted]

Austin should agree to join them, just so he can sit in the ring and have them run a razor over his head while nothing happens since he's bald anyway.

[Deleted]

PG does not mean totally devoid of mature content. It means that it is just kept at a low-enough scale that it is acceptable for children to be exposed to it with parental guidance.

Honestly, would say that there will likely be a Punk / Austin confrontation... after the show. My guess, Punk will come out and cut a promo on Austin who will put together that tag match in response, and it'll later show up on Youtube as filmed off of somebody's cellphone.

[I Like Your Poetry]

Mar 15, 2010 18:39:25 GMT -5 Lizuka #BLM said:

PG does not mean totally devoid of mature content. It means that it is just kept at a low-enough scale that it is acceptable for children to be exposed to it with parental guidance.

THANK YOU.....PG does NOT mean Mickey Mouse and every match ending in a rousing challenge of patty cake.

[SenorCrest]

Mar 15, 2010 17:24:54 GMT -5 Muskrat said:

Mar 15, 2010 17:16:49 GMT -5 Tyfo said:

Hell, I don't think they've once even mentioned that the guy holding RAW's WWE Championship is technically a SmackDown guy.

I thought they stated that part of the deal with McMahon was that Batista's contract was moved from SmackDown to Raw when he won the title.

Mr. Tista is still on the SD roster. WWE.com says so.

[BD Punk AKA SUSPENDED!]

I laugh my ass off if when Austin called for the ringside guy to throw him a "Steveweiser" he got a Pepsi instead. Austin looks confused and then Punk's music hits. Of course, in the end Punk eats a Stunner.

[Metalheadbanger Man]

Mar 15, 2010 18:39:25 GMT -5 Lizuka #BLM said:

PG does not mean totally devoid of mature content. It means that it is just kept at a low-enough scale that it is acceptable for children to be exposed to it with parental guidance.

Exactly. The Springer segment from a few weeks back really pushed the PG rating, with all the talk about sexual performance and whatnot.

[SEND FOR THE MAN!!!]

Mar 15, 2010 18:33:44 GMT -5 @bootytime said:

Austin should agree to join them, just so he can sit in the ring and have them run a razor over his head while nothing happens since he's bald anyway.

I will not let this get this no sold. Simply. Hilarious.