|
Post by KAMALARAMBO: BOOMSHAKALAKA!!! on Jun 7, 2010 17:06:48 GMT -5
I remember a while back there was a thread about Zack Ryder and how his Wikipedia page kept getting deleted. Well, what are some things that do have Wikipedia pages that you think really don't deserve them. I'll start with this: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bad_RonaldA crappy TV movie from the 1970s. I have no idea why it hasn't faded into complete obscurity.
|
|
|
Post by Red Impact on Jun 7, 2010 17:10:45 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by FrankGotch on Jun 7, 2010 17:17:03 GMT -5
I remember a while back there was a thread about Zack Ryder and how his Wikipedia page kept getting deleted. Well, what are some things that do have Wikipedia pages that you think really don't deserve them. I'll start with this: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bad_RonaldA crappy TV movie from the 1970s. I have no idea why it hasn't faded into complete obscurity. Bad Ronald totally deserves its own page. They just don't make TV movies like that anymore.
|
|
|
Post by KAMALARAMBO: BOOMSHAKALAKA!!! on Jun 7, 2010 17:19:38 GMT -5
I remember a while back there was a thread about Zack Ryder and how his Wikipedia page kept getting deleted. Well, what are some things that do have Wikipedia pages that you think really don't deserve them. I'll start with this: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bad_RonaldA crappy TV movie from the 1970s. I have no idea why it hasn't faded into complete obscurity. Bad Ronald totally deserves its own page. They just don't make TV movies like that anymore. To each his own, I suppose. I saw the movie and it just bored the hell out of me.
|
|
|
Post by FrankGotch on Jun 7, 2010 17:27:41 GMT -5
Bad Ronald totally deserves its own page. They just don't make TV movies like that anymore. To each his own, I suppose. I saw the movie and it just bored the hell out of me. Come on dude. Bad Ronald isn't the type of movie that you sit down and watch alone. However it is a perfect movie to sit down with some friends an make fun of. I mean its just one of those movies where you can't even describe the premise without laughing. The 70's was filled to the brim with awesome TV movies like Bad Ronald. There was one I can't think of the name of were a dude trains animals to rob banks, and it was aired as a serious drama. You can't pay for comedic gold like that these days.
|
|
|
Post by KAMALARAMBO: BOOMSHAKALAKA!!! on Jun 7, 2010 17:40:45 GMT -5
To each his own, I suppose. I saw the movie and it just bored the hell out of me. Come on dude. Bad Ronald isn't the type of movie that you sit down and watch alone. However it is a perfect movie to sit down with some friends an make fun of. I mean its just one of those movies where you can't even describe the premise without laughing. The 70's was filled to the brim with awesome TV movies like Bad Ronald. There was one I can't think of the name of were a dude trains animals to rob banks, and it was aired as a serious drama. You can't pay for comedic gold like that these days. Oh, I haven't tried to watch it, in an MST3K way. I agree though, it would be a different experience anyway. Just like how, watching the 1960s Spider-Man cartoon is awesome if you are looking for a laugh. Not to go too off topic, but some of my favorite parts from that cartoon. * A train speeding by with something like, "Top secret train" written in big bold letters on it. *The Rhino having a plan to show his dominance by stealing a bunch of gold. Then making a statue of himself with the gold, in the one place everyone could see his power! In an underground sewer!
|
|
|
Post by Neo Het Is Evil Dead on Jun 7, 2010 17:52:52 GMT -5
To each his own, I suppose. I saw the movie and it just bored the hell out of me. Come on dude. Bad Ronald isn't the type of movie that you sit down and watch alone. However it is a perfect movie to sit down with some friends an make fun of. I mean its just one of those movies where you can't even describe the premise without laughing. The 70's was filled to the brim with awesome TV movies like Bad Ronald. There was one I can't think of the name of were a dude trains animals to rob banks, and it was aired as a serious drama. You can't pay for comedic gold like that these days. I think you're talking about the doberman gang which wasn't a made for tv movie but an actual film that went to thearters. My mom has been telling me about it for years but she's never been able to track down a copy of it for me to see. Oh and it was doberman pinchers that the guy train to rob banks thus why it's called the doberman gang. Warning: The most awesome movie poster ever below {Spoiler}
|
|
|
Post by Pervy Stone Cold on Jun 7, 2010 20:25:18 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by FrankGotch on Jun 7, 2010 22:27:47 GMT -5
Come on dude. Bad Ronald isn't the type of movie that you sit down and watch alone. However it is a perfect movie to sit down with some friends an make fun of. I mean its just one of those movies where you can't even describe the premise without laughing. The 70's was filled to the brim with awesome TV movies like Bad Ronald. There was one I can't think of the name of were a dude trains animals to rob banks, and it was aired as a serious drama. You can't pay for comedic gold like that these days. I think you're talking about the doberman gang which wasn't a made for tv movie but an actual film that went to thearters. My mom has been telling me about it for years but she's never been able to track down a copy of it for me to see. Oh and it was doberman pinchers that the guy train to rob banks thus why it's called the doberman gang. Warning: The most awesome movie poster ever below {Spoiler} You sir are correct. Though I could've swore that there was also a monkey involved somehow.
|
|
Kruton
Bubba Ho-Tep
I'd stand on my head to make you a deal
Posts: 564
|
Post by Kruton on Jun 8, 2010 0:56:54 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Curt Hawkins Fan on Jun 8, 2010 1:17:05 GMT -5
Holy s***, Ryder has a wiki page now!
Holy shit times 2, Hawkins has his own wiki page!
|
|
|
Post by mcmahonfan85 on Jun 8, 2010 1:22:13 GMT -5
Holy s***, Ryder has a wiki page now! Holy s*** times 2, Hawkins has his own wiki page! the pro wrestling group on Wikipedia is the most useless, worthless and pointless thing on Wikipedia
|
|
|
Post by SsnakeBite, the No1 Frenchman on Jun 8, 2010 2:33:58 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by sunwukong on Jun 8, 2010 2:37:30 GMT -5
I have always hated this. As shown from the parsing difficulty section, there's a lot preventing it from actually meaning anything. It's only a gramatatically valid in the broadest possible sense and demonstrates very little about the English language.
|
|
|
Post by ShaolinHandLock on Jun 8, 2010 2:40:42 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by sunwukong on Jun 8, 2010 2:41:27 GMT -5
If you know anything about Jimmy "Jimbo" Wales (Wikipedia's co-founder, who now declares himself Wikipedia's sole founder), it's not shocking in the least. Guy is pure, walking ego.
|
|
|
Post by SsnakeBite, the No1 Frenchman on Jun 8, 2010 3:11:33 GMT -5
For the same reason dictionnaries have a "dictionnary" entry aand encyclopedias have an "encyclopedia" entry.
|
|
|
Post by Baixo Astral on Jun 8, 2010 3:41:20 GMT -5
For the same reason dictionnaries have a "dictionnary" entry aand encyclopedias have an "encyclopedia" entry. That'd better be irony, Snackbite.
|
|
|
Post by thatguybayne on Jun 8, 2010 3:56:45 GMT -5
Isn't that like typing Google into Google which according to Jen from the IT Crowd could break the internet?
|
|
default
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Blames Everything On Snitsky. Yes, Even THAT.
Posts: 17,056
|
Post by default on Jun 8, 2010 4:38:14 GMT -5
|
|