|
|
Post by Citizen Snips Has Left on Mar 20, 2010 9:55:45 GMT -5
Because a draw would negate the ENTIRE point of the match? The whole build is that someone's entire legacy is going to come crashing down and to not follow through with that would be the Fingerpoke of Doom for WWE.
|
|
|
|
Post by wrestlecrapcrap on Mar 20, 2010 10:25:32 GMT -5
The Undertaker never lost at Wrestlemania, that's what it's all about! We have the option of saying if he lost or if he won. Neither guy will lose, but neither guy will win either. I think this is the perfect idea, mainly because I don't want either to happen. Somehow 17-0-1 doesn't sound anywhere near as impressive as 18-0, which is more to the point. Exactly. Can anyone really see them trying to sell Taker's match next year with his opponent saying 'I'm going to break the streak, that's kind of a streak but not really since you kind of won but kind of didn't last year!'. A draw is not happening. |
|
|
|
Post by Brick Killed a Guy on Mar 20, 2010 10:42:04 GMT -5
Because a draw would negate the ENTIRE point of the match? The whole build is that someone's entire legacy is going to crashing down and to not follow through with that would be the Fingerpoke of Doom for WWE. Agreed. It's the biggest event of the year and you have to deliver on a match as big as this. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 20, 2010 11:43:24 GMT -5
theyre announcing this match as the biggest match in wrestlemania history.
no way this is ending in a draw.
|
|
|
|
Post by Citizen Snips Has Left on Mar 20, 2010 12:32:52 GMT -5
theyre announcing this match as the biggest match in wrestlemania history. no way this is ending in a draw. Slightly off-topic, but when they say that, I get irked. I know they have to hype it up and all, but seriously? Never mind Hogan/Andre, this isn't even as big as Hogan/Warrior. |
|
|
|
Post by Slingshot Suplay on Mar 20, 2010 13:03:33 GMT -5
I'm not gonna be happy unless there's run-ins by Marty Jannetty, Dan Spivey, Brother Love, Paul Bearer, Jose Lothario, Paul Diamond, the Barber Shop Window, a bunch of marines, the Druids, Naked Mideon, Kane, the urn and Dean Douglas.
|
|
|
|
Post by sunsaz on Mar 20, 2010 14:43:10 GMT -5
I expect Taker winning after 3 tombstones, not necessarily in a row. No way this thing's ending in a draw.
|
|
|
|
Post by BatPunk on Mar 20, 2010 18:31:15 GMT -5
HBK is gonna slump Taker in the corner and deliver 5 SCM's and goes for the pin.
Taker kicks out, sits up and stares at HBK and beats him with a shoulder block
18-0
|
|
dav
Hank Scorpio
Posts: 6,033
Member is Online
|
Post by dav on Mar 20, 2010 18:38:26 GMT -5
HBK is gonna slump Taker in the corner and deliver 5 SCM's and goes for the pin. Taker kicks out, sits up and stares at HBK and beats him with a shoulder block 18-0 Undertaker comes ou with his fists pre-taped. Michaels lies down in the middle of the ring. 18-0 |
|
|
|
Post by thedavefather on Mar 20, 2010 18:42:59 GMT -5
This is EASILY bigger then Hogan vs Warrior....what the hell was that....yah face vs face and the torched passed to Warrior but so what. This is either the end of Takers HUGE streak or HBK's AMAZING career.....yeah it is BIGGER! Hogan and Andre we could debate!
|
|
|
|
Post by Hulkshi Tanahashi on Mar 20, 2010 19:09:47 GMT -5
It better not end in a draw. If it does, I'm driving to Stamford and destroying as much of WWE headquarters as I can with a sledgehammer before they arrest me.
|
|
|
|
Post by Robbymac on Mar 20, 2010 23:27:57 GMT -5
I've said this before. I'm spending an insane amount of money to fly to Phoenix and attend this event.
If this match ends in a draw of any kind I will get up, leave the stadium, and NEVER watch WWE wrestling again. (I'm one of the biggest WWE apologists around)
I may even be so pissed I drive 24 hours back home to Iowa rather than wait for my Tuesday flight.
|
|
|
|
Post by Robbymac on Mar 20, 2010 23:30:09 GMT -5
theyre announcing this match as the biggest match in wrestlemania history. no way this is ending in a draw. Slightly off-topic, but when they say that, I get irked. I know they have to hype it up and all, but seriously? Never mind Hogan/Andre, this isn't even as big as Hogan/Warrior. I think its bigger than Hogan/Warrior. Not as big as Hogan/Andre or Rock/Austin II |
|
|
|
Post by Mayonnaise on Mar 20, 2010 23:39:29 GMT -5
Honestly, if it goes on last, Taker wins clean. If it goes on any earlier, Taker wins after HHH interfers, helping Shawn, but, Shawn refuses to take the win so Trips takes out Shawn.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 20, 2010 23:41:53 GMT -5
Honestly, if it goes on last, Taker wins clean. If it goes on any earlier, Taker wins after HHH interfers, helping Shawn, but, Shawn refuses to take the win so Trips takes out Shawn. Pretty much what I see, particularly that second route. Though I can also see Sheamus losing to Triple H and as such deciding to try and retire Michaels as revenge, which'd lead to Trips running down, chasing him off, then trying to hit Taker with the sledgehammer only to miss and nail Shawn. Either way, Taker's winning and I think Triple H will be responsible for it. |
|
Parrish
El Dandy
Banana Man Wouldn't Book That!!!
Posts: 8,729
|
Post by Parrish on Mar 21, 2010 0:13:24 GMT -5
as much as I would love it, the streak is not getting broken. No draws either, I guess shawn needs a few months to a year off to rest
|
|
