|
|
Post by RealMattKozza91 on Mar 30, 2010 3:31:47 GMT -5
With his participation at WrestleMania 26's Money in the Bank match, Kane broke Bret Hart's previous record of the most consecutive WrestleMania matches with 13.
|
|
|
|
Post by Alex Shelley on Mar 30, 2010 3:33:40 GMT -5
Go Kane go!  |
|
|
|
Post by Spankymac is sick of the swiss on Mar 30, 2010 3:34:50 GMT -5
Interesting little trivia note. Wait, I don't remember him being on the Wrestlemania XIX card. Also, what's his won/loss record for being on 13 'Manias?
|
|
|
|
Post by Chuckie Finster on Mar 30, 2010 3:35:47 GMT -5
Kane was on the WM19 preshow teaming with RVD taking on Morley and Storm for the tag titles. I think that still counts.
|
|
Greer
Unicron
Points. Don't. Matter.
Posts: 3,199
|
Post by Greer on Mar 30, 2010 3:37:19 GMT -5
Was I the only one rooting for Kane to win MITB?
Everytime he got a shot at the briefcase the fans got into it. He has so much support from the fans for being a veteran, I'm hoping he gets one last run at a world title.
I know he wants to help the young guys, but come on. Just one more shot.
|
|
|
|
Post by D2: Sweet & Sour Edition on Mar 30, 2010 3:37:41 GMT -5
Kane was on the WM19 preshow teaming with RVD taking on Morley and Storm for the tag titles. I think that still counts. If they are talking about appearing AT WrestleMania, then it would count. As far as the matches that count for WrestleMania, only those televised count. |
|
|
|
Post by perpetualn00b on Mar 30, 2010 3:37:59 GMT -5
With his participation at WrestleMania 26's Money in the Bank match, Kane broke Bret Hart's previous record of the most consecutive WrestleMania matches with 13. Kane wasn't on XIX. So no go there. Undertaker, I think, is closest now. He's at 10 and counting. |
|
|
|
Post by El Kabongs Revenge on Mar 30, 2010 5:10:50 GMT -5
WWE counts any pre-show matches in the record books in the program where they show off the Wrestlemania records in the back each year so it counts to me.
Good job Kane.
|
|
The Ichi
Patti Mayonnaise
AGGRESSIVE Executive Janitor of the Third Floor Manager's Bathroom
Posts: 37,304 
|
Post by The Ichi on Mar 30, 2010 5:12:50 GMT -5
With his participation at WrestleMania 26's Money in the Bank match, Kane broke Bret Hart's previous record of the most consecutive WrestleMania matches with 13. Kane wasn't on XIX. So no go there. Didn't he have a dark match? |
|
|
|
Post by Citizen Snips Has Left on Mar 30, 2010 6:07:19 GMT -5
The match at XIX was televised on Heat, so I'd count it.
|
|
|
|
Post by perpetualn00b on Mar 30, 2010 7:32:39 GMT -5
Kane wasn't on XIX. So no go there. Didn't he have a dark match? As far as I'm concerned, if I didn't (or rather, couldn't) see it on PPV, it doesn't count. |
|
|
|
Post by sunsaz on Mar 30, 2010 7:41:34 GMT -5
Sorry, Kane. But I don't count dark matches at WM or anywhere else.
|
|
peter
AC Slater
Posts: 248
|
Post by peter on Mar 30, 2010 8:08:50 GMT -5
A few days before WM 26, WWE.com had an article called "WrestleMania Rookies" which had featured all the wrestlers who were about to compete in their first WM. The Miz was featured in this article and they even specified his involvement in last year's pre-show match as just that, a pre-show match. They made it clear that WM 26 was his first WM. As for Kane at WM 19, his match was officially a Sunday Night HEAT match.
|
|
salz4life
Grimlock
Prichard is a guy who gets that his job is to service his boss.
Posts: 14,007
|
Post by salz4life on Mar 30, 2010 8:37:40 GMT -5
I wish Kane would get another run with a World Title. I know he has stated he's perfectly content in the role he has now and because of that, it shouldn't matter, but I just think he deserves it. It could be a simple 1-2 month role as a transitional champ. I just think when you look back at his career (which to me has been as solid as they come), that 24 hour reign after King of the Ring '98 just seems like it wasn't enough.
|
|
|
|
Post by BlackJackRobby on Mar 30, 2010 8:38:57 GMT -5
I don't think it counts as Miz, Orton, and Diabiase were saying they are in there first WrestleMania this year.
They are not counting dark matches, and no one has ever really counted dark matches before.
So Kane does not get the record.
Great achievment but I presume that's why the WWE did not say anything about it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 30, 2010 8:42:32 GMT -5
I agree that Kane deserves a shot at some point down the line. He's kept himself clean, injury free, and the fans are into him. He held the title once LONG ago (almost makes me wonder if he'd set a record for most time between two title reigns...wait, Backlund probably tops Kane there if that we're to happen, wouldn't he?) so it would be lame not to give him another shot when he has all that going for him.
|
|
|
|
Post by GuyOfOwnage on Mar 30, 2010 11:15:31 GMT -5
(almost makes me wonder if he'd set a record for most time between two title reigns...wait, Backlund probably tops Kane there if that we're to happen, wouldn't he?) Actually, no. Backlund lost the title in December 1983 and won it again in November 1994, so that's just a month shy of 11 years, whereas it's been almost 12 now for Kane. |
|
|
|
Post by derrtaysouth95 on Mar 31, 2010 0:56:33 GMT -5
Well he finally did something to get in the record books that matters.
|
|
|
|
Post by mschif420 on Mar 31, 2010 0:58:33 GMT -5
Well he finally did something to get in the record books that matters. Consecutive rumbles  |
|
chazraps
Wade Wilson
Better have my money when I come-a collect!
Posts: 27,986
|
Post by chazraps on Mar 31, 2010 1:47:54 GMT -5
The match at XIX was televised on Heat, so I'd count it. Lance Storm was in that match too, and nobody counts that as a Wrestlemania appearance so why should we do it for Kane? |
|
helped $lim jinx NXT. Woops
