JBL Should Still Own HBK...

[Hawk Hart]

or he should've at least retained possession for longer than he did.

Technically, when Shawn's wife slapped JBL at No Way Out 2009, should that have been been a DQ? I was at the event live and when this happened a few people were rather upset this blatant interference was allowed.

So, who's with me on this point?

[Stotty]

yeah, and hornswaggle's still technically in the 2009 (i think) Royal Rumble. Try not to think about it.

Someone get that image of vince with the mind eraser thing from Men in Black.

[brettappedout (BLM)]

She was a fan, if a fan hits a wrestler it's not a DQ.

[livetowin]

Apr 7, 2010 6:43:19 GMT -5 Stotty said:

yeah, and hornswaggle's still technically in the 2009 (i think) Royal Rumble. Try not to think about it.

Someone get that image of vince with the mind eraser thing from Men in Black.

HEY! Maven was never legally eliminated from the 2002 Royal Rumble!

BRING HIM BACK VINCE!

[RealMattKozza91]

Spike Dudley never made it in the 04 rumble, so technically the 04 winner doesnt exist anymore, so ill do the honour!!

WINNER of the 2004 royal rumble, SPIKE DUDLEY

WM 20 Triple H vs Shawn Michaels vs Spike Dudley

[Joseph S. Hasan]

I do not know if I agree, but the subject line sure was funny.

[Perpetual Nirvana]

Apr 7, 2010 22:43:16 GMT -5 livetowin said:

Apr 7, 2010 6:43:19 GMT -5 Stotty said:

yeah, and hornswaggle's still technically in the 2009 (i think) Royal Rumble. Try not to think about it.

Someone get that image of vince with the mind eraser thing from Men in Black.

HEY! Maven was never legally eliminated from the 2002 Royal Rumble!

BRING HIM BACK VINCE!

Yeah, he was. Why do people always overlook that Undertaker tossed him back in the ring, threw him over the top, THEN beat the living crap out of him?

[Tea & Crumpets]

Scotty 2 Hotty won the 2005 Royal Rumble.

Seriously, he totally did. Hassan injures him preventing him reaching the ring. Cena & Batista BOTH spill out to the floor so are eliminated. Scotty was never eliminated, therefore Scotty won.

S2H vs HHH, biggest Mania main event of all time.

[Abadebe]

Apr 8, 2010 8:40:02 GMT -5 Perpetual Nirvana said:

Apr 7, 2010 22:43:16 GMT -5 livetowin said:

HEY! Maven was never legally eliminated from the 2002 Royal Rumble!

BRING HIM BACK VINCE!

Yeah, he was. Why do people always overlook that Undertaker tossed him back in the ring, threw him over the top, THEN beat the living crap out of him?

But Taker was already eliminated at that point. Maven should've been allowed to continue like Shawn Michaels was in 1996 when Vader tossed him out after being eliminated himself.

[Perpetual Nirvana]

Apr 8, 2010 8:52:45 GMT -5 Abadebe said:

Apr 8, 2010 8:40:02 GMT -5 Perpetual Nirvana said:

Yeah, he was. Why do people always overlook that Undertaker tossed him back in the ring, threw him over the top, THEN beat the living crap out of him?

But Taker was already eliminated at that point. Maven should've been allowed to continue like Shawn Michaels was in 1996 when Vader tossed him out after being eliminated himself.

That's another rule they seem to play fast and loose with.

Hell, Maven only got the opening to eliminate Undertaker after the Hardys, who'd been eliminated, came back in and double-teamed him.

[Pooh Carlson]

Yeah, I didn't like the fact that they overlooked the interference. I would've liked to have seen JBL still claim ownership and the only way HBK would be able to gain his freedom would be to beat The Undertaker at Wrestlemania. That way, HBK wouldn't have tried to play the heel, JBL would. And it would've been a better story with HBK not wanting to end the streak out of respect for The Undertaker, but having to to gain freedom from JBL.

[Agent P]

I still wanna eat at "Shawn Michaels" while the man dances outside in a monkey suit.

[truwrestlingfan]

Apr 8, 2010 9:42:21 GMT -5 Pooh Carlson said:

Yeah, I didn't like the fact that they overlooked the interference. I would've liked to have seen JBL still claim ownership and the only way HBK would be able to gain his freedom would be to beat The Undertaker at Wrestlemania. That way, HBK wouldn't have tried to play the heel, JBL would. And it would've been a better story with HBK not wanting to end the streak out of respect for The Undertaker, but having to to gain freedom from JBL.

But as Mr. Wrestlemania that would make no sense. HBK believed he was the best of all time at Mania. Why would he want to keep someone else's streak that may overshadow him?

[Pooh Carlson]

Apr 8, 2010 13:56:45 GMT -5 @truwrestlingfan said:

Apr 8, 2010 9:42:21 GMT -5 Pooh Carlson said:

Yeah, I didn't like the fact that they overlooked the interference. I would've liked to have seen JBL still claim ownership and the only way HBK would be able to gain his freedom would be to beat The Undertaker at Wrestlemania. That way, HBK wouldn't have tried to play the heel, JBL would. And it would've been a better story with HBK not wanting to end the streak out of respect for The Undertaker, but having to to gain freedom from JBL.

But as Mr. Wrestlemania that would make no sense. HBK believed he was the best of all time at Mania. Why would he want to keep someone else's streak that may overshadow him?

Out of face-respect for a fellow legend. I just felt like last year's story was very rushed. Though the match was great, I hated the story of it. I felt that the angle could have benefited from a full-blown heel like JBL on the sidelines.

[ozza]

Apr 7, 2010 22:43:16 GMT -5 livetowin said:

Apr 7, 2010 6:43:19 GMT -5 Stotty said:

yeah, and hornswaggle's still technically in the 2009 (i think) Royal Rumble. Try not to think about it.

Someone get that image of vince with the mind eraser thing from Men in Black.

HEY! Maven was never legally eliminated from the 2002 Royal Rumble!

BRING HIM BACK VINCE!

Haha I saw the title of this thread and thought exactly the same thing! He wuz robbed!!