|
Post by darthobiwan on Oct 15, 2010 21:20:16 GMT -5
I'm going to start a new idea, kinda based on Possum's should have been champion polls. The difference is these will be guys who were world champions and you have to decide if they worthy of having the title or not. If not you could give reasons why not and what you have done differently. If yes you can say why they did deserve it or change any other things about their title reign(s). This isn't about if they should have had as long of reign and/or as many reigns, just if they deserved the title period. I'm going to leave out guys like hogan, flair, austin, and even cena for now since mostly everyone would agree that they deserved the title at least once. next one is... ***results so far *Yes buddy rogers- 15-1 *undecided ivan koloff- 4-4
|
|
|
Post by Bake Or Die on Oct 16, 2010 9:33:36 GMT -5
No
|
|
Crappler El 0 M
Dalek
Never Forgets an Octagon
I'm a good R-Truth.
Posts: 58,479
|
Post by Crappler El 0 M on Oct 16, 2010 10:41:17 GMT -5
No
|
|