|
Post by darthobiwan on Oct 17, 2010 22:14:14 GMT -5
I'm going to start a new idea, kinda based on Possum's should have been champion polls. The difference is these will be guys who were world champions and you have to decide if they worthy of having the title or not. If not you could give reasons why not and what you have done differently. If yes you can say why they did deserve it or change any other things about their title reign(s). This isn't about if they should have had as long of reign and/or as many reigns, just if they deserved the title period. I'm going to leave out guys like hogan, flair, austin, and even cena for now since mostly everyone would agree that they deserved the title at least once. next one is... ***results so far *Yes superstar billy graham- 19-0 buddy rogers- 15-1 *No stan stasiak- 9-4 *undecided ivan koloff- 4-4
|
|
Crappler El 0 M
Dalek
Never Forgets an Octagon
I'm a good R-Truth.
Posts: 58,479
|
Post by Crappler El 0 M on Oct 17, 2010 22:27:08 GMT -5
No. He is not officially recognized as a WWE Champion.
|
|
|
Post by Bake Or Die on Oct 17, 2010 23:21:53 GMT -5
I'm one of the few who will probably give him a yes.
|
|
Crappler El 0 M
Dalek
Never Forgets an Octagon
I'm a good R-Truth.
Posts: 58,479
|
Post by Crappler El 0 M on Oct 17, 2010 23:28:23 GMT -5
Since it's Inoki, I will elaborate on my 'No.' I know he worked WWWF shows for a few years in the late '70s and early '80s, but I am not sure how often he worked in WWE compared to his commitments in Japan. It would probably have been better for WWE to keep their title on someone who could consistently work their territory.
|
|
Celgress
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
The Superior One
Posts: 19,009
|
Post by Celgress on Oct 18, 2010 17:46:18 GMT -5
Yes, imho.
|
|
OB91
Team Rocket
Posts: 988
|
Post by OB91 on Oct 18, 2010 17:46:20 GMT -5
It would be nice if you put the names next to the photos.
|
|