Did he deserve the title? Day 7

[darthobiwan]

I'm going to start a new idea, kinda based on Possum's should have been champion polls. The difference is these will be guys who were world champions and you have to decide if they worthy of having the title or not. If not you could give reasons why not and what you have done differently. If yes you can say why they did deserve it or change any other things about their title reign(s).

This isn't about if they should have had as long of reign and/or as many reigns, just if they deserved the title period. I'm going to leave out guys like hogan, flair, austin, and even cena for now since mostly everyone would agree that they deserved the title at least once.

next one is...





Andre the Giant

***results so far

*Yes
superstar billy graham- 19-0
iron sheik- 21-1
buddy rogers- 15-1
antonio inoki- 8-7

*No
stan stasiak- 9-4


*undecided
ivan koloff- 4-4

[Crappler El 0 M]

Yes. He deserved it for all his years of service to WWE and for being such a big draw over the years. His feud with Hogan helped bring WWE to a whole new level. I am not sure any moment in WWE has surpassed Hogan and Andre's staredown at Mania 3 and the bodyslam which would come later.

[the5thhorseman]

Yes

[The Possum]

Yes, and for much longer than he had it.

[Bake Or Die]

Yes

[Incognito]

Absolutely. He was, without a doubt, the 8th wonder of the world.

When getting the stories backstage and observing the impact he had on the crowd, it's believable that for a moment he was one of the few who truly held the fate of Hulkamania in his hands.