|
|
Post by Back to being Cenanuff on Jun 1, 2010 0:05:03 GMT -5
Bryan Danielson beat Miz, and threw him into Cole. All I see now is one thread about it. What's goin on here?
|
|
|
|
Post by Kevin Hamilton on Jun 1, 2010 0:05:55 GMT -5
Kinda refreshing that it's thus far been kept in perspective actually; cool though it was.
|
|
Chainsaw
T
A very BAD man.
It is what it is
Posts: 90,480
|
Post by Chainsaw on Jun 1, 2010 0:07:58 GMT -5
Believe me, I was marking out hard. I actually take the time to watch every segment they're involved in now, moreso than the rest of the show.
|
|
Dub H
Crow T. Robot
Captain Pixel: the Game Master
I ❤ Aniki
Posts: 47,878
|
Post by Dub H on Jun 1, 2010 0:15:27 GMT -5
Im glad there isnt alot of theard about it,even if alot of smark marked.
It would just end up being a bunch of daniel hater vs daniel fans threads,and it got tiring.
I also marked!Neve watched Daniel Bryan on the indies,but i like him so far.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rorschach on Jun 1, 2010 0:43:31 GMT -5
Kinda refreshing that it's thus far been kept in perspective actually; cool though it was. It's kind of odd....but Cole and Danielson have almost become the new McMahon and Austin. It was indeed a markout moment tonight seeing Miz get tossed onto Cole. And Cole was turning the asshole-meter up to 11 with the crap he was spitting about Bryan. |
|
|
|
Post by wcw on Jun 1, 2010 0:47:07 GMT -5
Kinda refreshing that it's thus far been kept in perspective actually; cool though it was. It's kind of odd....but Cole and Danielson have almost become the new McMahon and Austin. It was indeed a markout moment tonight seeing Miz get tossed onto Cole. And Cole was turning the asshole-meter up to 11 with the crap he was spitting about Bryan. I am actually kinda shocked the WWE hasn't tried to recapture that McMahon Austin type feud in a while. The dabbled with it a couple of times with McMahon and Cena 4 years ago but they backed off it and haven't really tried to do it since. Maybe they are just waiting for the right guy (Both the wrestler and the authority figure) to do it with. I think that in order for a McMahon vs Austin like feud to work it needs to be a McMahon as the authority figure (Either Shane or Stephanie) because a GM vs a wrestler just wouldn't cut it. |
|
|
|
Post by Rorschach on Jun 1, 2010 0:53:11 GMT -5
It's kind of odd....but Cole and Danielson have almost become the new McMahon and Austin. It was indeed a markout moment tonight seeing Miz get tossed onto Cole. And Cole was turning the asshole-meter up to 11 with the crap he was spitting about Bryan. I am actually kinda shocked the WWE hasn't tried to recapture that McMahon Austin type feud in a while. The dabbled with it a couple of times with McMahon and Cena 4 years ago but they backed off it and haven't really tried to do it since. Maybe they are just waiting for the right guy (Both the wrestler and the authority figure) to do it with. I think that in order for a McMahon vs Austin like feud to work it needs to be a McMahon as the authority figure (Either Shane or Stephanie) because a GM vs a wrestler just wouldn't cut it. You're forgetting a McMahon:  I fully expect the next iteration of Hunter's character to be a "Mr. Levesque" type of role, where he and Stephanie become the defacto rulers of RAW (yes, AGAIN.) |
|
|
|
Post by Nacho STAYS Hyped on Jun 1, 2010 0:55:30 GMT -5
Cole's reaction to Bryan winning literally had me rolling on the floor laughing. And when Bryan threw the Cleveland Steamer onto Cole, I marked harder than I have in a LONG time.
|
|
|
|
Post by wcw on Jun 1, 2010 1:01:06 GMT -5
I am actually kinda shocked the WWE hasn't tried to recapture that McMahon Austin type feud in a while. The dabbled with it a couple of times with McMahon and Cena 4 years ago but they backed off it and haven't really tried to do it since. Maybe they are just waiting for the right guy (Both the wrestler and the authority figure) to do it with. I think that in order for a McMahon vs Austin like feud to work it needs to be a McMahon as the authority figure (Either Shane or Stephanie) because a GM vs a wrestler just wouldn't cut it. You're forgetting a McMahon: I fully expect the next iteration of Hunter's character to be a "Mr. Levesque" type of role, where he and Stephanie become the defacto rulers of RAW (yes, AGAIN.) Good idea except you know HHH would want to play the McMahon character and wrestle. Which in that case why bother? Its just going to be a more honest version of how things work with HHH and the fans wouldn't care and you would be wasting a chance to get a guy over. However if in 10 years HHH decides to hang em up and wants to be an on-air authority figure then that could work. But as long as he is actively working as a wrestler it won't work. |
|
Allie Kitsune
Crow T. Robot
Always Feelin' Foxy.
HaHa U FaLL 4 LaVa TriK
Posts: 46,162 
|
Post by Allie Kitsune on Jun 1, 2010 1:01:23 GMT -5
Bryan Danielson beat Miz, and threw him into Cole. All I see now is one thread about it. What's goin on here? CM Punk wasn't involved. There's no boardgasm unless Punk is involved. |
|
|
|
Post by Kris Kobain on Jun 1, 2010 1:02:04 GMT -5
I missed Raw....
I missed NXT when Bryan did the awesome promo
I will not miss NXT on tuesday....
|
|
|
|
Post by Rorschach on Jun 1, 2010 1:18:15 GMT -5
You're forgetting a McMahon: I fully expect the next iteration of Hunter's character to be a "Mr. Levesque" type of role, where he and Stephanie become the defacto rulers of RAW (yes, AGAIN.) Good idea except you know HHH would want to play the McMahon character and wrestle. Which in that case why bother? Its just going to be a more honest version of how things work with HHH and the fans wouldn't care and you would be wasting a chance to get a guy over. However if in 10 years HHH decides to hang em up and wants to be an on-air authority figure then that could work. But as long as he is actively working as a wrestler it won't work. Why not? Vince was CEO and actively getting into the ring with people...hell, he entered (and goddamn WON) the Royal Rumble, and also became WWF Champion! So why couldn't Hunter do both? I get what you're saying though....it'd be a huge conflict of interest, but I think it might be a tad too close to the "real" way that the WWE works to have Hunter as the CEO and an active, Championship seeking competitor. Unless they just want to make him a total douche, and have him arbitrarily book himself into the WWE title picture all the time. In which case, if they let Orton take off as the anti authority figure badass.....THEN they might just have something, and they MIGHT just be able to REDO that feud (Orton vs. McMahon/Levesque) like it SHOULD have been done in the first place....with the McMahons as the evil, corporate, white collar scumbag heels and Orton as the sympathetic, albeit badass babyface who has to SOMEHOW find a way to overcome the machinations of the Corporation and win the WWE Title....just like a certain OTHER serpent-themed wrestler did not too long ago. ;D |
|
Mozenrath
FANatic
Foppery and Whim
Speedy Speed Boy
Posts: 121,125
|
Post by Mozenrath on Jun 1, 2010 7:59:13 GMT -5
I am actually kinda shocked the WWE hasn't tried to recapture that McMahon Austin type feud in a while. The dabbled with it a couple of times with McMahon and Cena 4 years ago but they backed off it and haven't really tried to do it since. Maybe they are just waiting for the right guy (Both the wrestler and the authority figure) to do it with. I think that in order for a McMahon vs Austin like feud to work it needs to be a McMahon as the authority figure (Either Shane or Stephanie) because a GM vs a wrestler just wouldn't cut it. You're forgetting a McMahon: I fully expect the next iteration of Hunter's character to be a "Mr. Levesque" type of role, where he and Stephanie become the defacto rulers of RAW (yes, AGAIN.) He'd probably go by Mr. Helmsley. After all, I'm sure a lot of people, myself included, are unsure how he pronounces his last name, plus in kayfabe he always goes by this. Otherwise? I'd love to see it. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 1, 2010 8:19:09 GMT -5
Bryan Danielson beat Miz, and threw him into Cole. All I see now is one thread about it. What's goin on here? CM Punk wasn't involved. There's no boardgasm unless Punk is involved. This could be part of it. If Punk ever attacks Cole they'll have to create a new forum just for that. |
|
|
|
Post by Perpetual Nirvana on Jun 1, 2010 8:23:10 GMT -5
CM Punk wasn't involved. There's no boardgasm unless Punk is involved. This could be part of it. If Punk ever attacks Cole they'll have to create a new forum just for that. What if Punk and Bryan both attack Cole while Batista pulls faces in the background? |
|
h
Hank Scorpio
Posts: 5,734
|
Post by h on Jun 1, 2010 8:26:24 GMT -5
Please don't say "boardgasm."
|
|
|
|
Post by Clash, Never a Meter Maid on Jun 1, 2010 10:08:17 GMT -5
This could be part of it. If Punk ever attacks Cole they'll have to create a new forum just for that. What if Punk and Bryan both attack Cole while Batista pulls faces in the background? We'd need Cena doing a "word life" freestyle about it for the finishing touch. |
|
