Post by darthobiwan on Nov 21, 2010 18:33:22 GMT -5
I'm going to start a new idea, kinda based on Possum's should have been champion polls. The difference is these will be guys who were world champions and you have to decide if they worthy of having the title or not. If not you could give reasons why not and what you have done differently. If yes you can say why they did deserve it or change any other things about their title reign(s).
This isn't about if they should have had as long of reign and/or as many reigns, just if they deserved the title period. I'm going to leave out guys like hogan, flair, austin, and even cena for now since mostly everyone would agree that they deserved the title at least once.
next one is...
I'm going to start a new idea, kinda based on Possum's should have been champion polls. The difference is these will be guys who were world champions and you have to decide if they worthy of having the title or not. If not you could give reasons why not and what you have done differently. If yes you can say why they did deserve it or change any other things about their title reign(s).
This isn't about if they should have had as long of reign and/or as many reigns, just if they deserved the title period. I'm going to leave out guys like hogan, flair, austin, and even cena for now since mostly everyone would agree that they deserved the title at least once.
starting with former nwa/tna champions
next one is...
Ken Shamrock
***results so far
*Yes
cm punk- 23-0
ricky steamboat- 21-0
superstar billy graham- 19-0
booker t- 29-1
eddie guerrero- 26-1
kane- 25-1
chris benoit- 23-1
iron sheik- 21-1
andre the giant- 19-1
chris jericho- 17-1
buddy rogers- 15-1
ultimate warrior- 21-3
mick foley- 20-3
rob van dam- 22-6
diamond dallas page- 20-4
goldberg- 19-5
sheamus- 19-6
yokozuna- 16-7
jeff hardy- 17-9
sid- 15-8
jbl- 16-11
scott steiner- 14-11
rey mysterio- 17-14
lex luger- 12-10
ron simmons- 11-9
jack swagger- 11-9
antonio inoki- 8-7
*No
ronnie garvin- 16-1
tommy rich- 12-1
vince russo- 31-4
david arquette- 25-4
great khali- 21-8
vince mcmahon- 16-3
stan stasiak- 9-4
sgt. slaughter- 13-11
*undecided
ivan koloff- 4-4
This isn't about if they should have had as long of reign and/or as many reigns, just if they deserved the title period. I'm going to leave out guys like hogan, flair, austin, and even cena for now since mostly everyone would agree that they deserved the title at least once.
next one is...
I'm going to start a new idea, kinda based on Possum's should have been champion polls. The difference is these will be guys who were world champions and you have to decide if they worthy of having the title or not. If not you could give reasons why not and what you have done differently. If yes you can say why they did deserve it or change any other things about their title reign(s).
This isn't about if they should have had as long of reign and/or as many reigns, just if they deserved the title period. I'm going to leave out guys like hogan, flair, austin, and even cena for now since mostly everyone would agree that they deserved the title at least once.
starting with former nwa/tna champions
next one is...
Ken Shamrock
***results so far
*Yes
cm punk- 23-0
ricky steamboat- 21-0
superstar billy graham- 19-0
booker t- 29-1
eddie guerrero- 26-1
kane- 25-1
chris benoit- 23-1
iron sheik- 21-1
andre the giant- 19-1
chris jericho- 17-1
buddy rogers- 15-1
ultimate warrior- 21-3
mick foley- 20-3
rob van dam- 22-6
diamond dallas page- 20-4
goldberg- 19-5
sheamus- 19-6
yokozuna- 16-7
jeff hardy- 17-9
sid- 15-8
jbl- 16-11
scott steiner- 14-11
rey mysterio- 17-14
lex luger- 12-10
ron simmons- 11-9
jack swagger- 11-9
antonio inoki- 8-7
*No
ronnie garvin- 16-1
tommy rich- 12-1
vince russo- 31-4
david arquette- 25-4
great khali- 21-8
vince mcmahon- 16-3
stan stasiak- 9-4
sgt. slaughter- 13-11
*undecided
ivan koloff- 4-4