|
Post by Orange on Mar 23, 2010 14:01:37 GMT -5
"we're sticking with this match until it's conclusion!" And then they take two commercials? ![???](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/smiley/huh.png) Did somebody not tell TNA that "sticking with the match 'till the end" doesn't mean "take multiple commercial breaks"?
|
|
comahan
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Posts: 17,899
|
Post by comahan on Mar 23, 2010 14:02:48 GMT -5
They mean that theyre sticking with it as long as it takes to end, ie it has overlap past 11:00
|
|
|
Post by Dave the Dave on Mar 23, 2010 14:06:50 GMT -5
I know what they meant, but it was still stupid.
|
|
Dave at the Movies
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
VINTAGE D-DAY DAVE! Always cranking dat thing.
Posts: 18,224
|
Post by Dave at the Movies on Mar 23, 2010 14:10:01 GMT -5
Yeah I hate it when they do this which is why I'm glad I don't watch it when it airs.
WWE is bad enough when they do it but I hate the extra annoying thing TNA does by coming back from commercial for like five seconds just to go back to commercial again.
did WCW use to do this? I remember they went to commercial during matches while WWF hardly ever did but I don't remember.
|
|
sabu
Don Corleone
Posts: 1,605
|
Post by sabu on Mar 23, 2010 14:37:57 GMT -5
there were way too many commercials last night.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 23, 2010 14:41:48 GMT -5
Honestly - I'd like to see them try their hand at product placement in an effort to reduce hte number of commericals.
I'm not sure who their advertisers are right now, but it wouldn't be too hard for something like having the Wolfpac coming out to the ring chugging some 5 hr energy drinks or something.
|
|
|
Post by GaTechGrad on Mar 23, 2010 17:24:38 GMT -5
did WCW use to do this? I remember they went to commercial during matches while WWF hardly ever did but I don't remember. WCW actually once broke to another SHOW (The New Adventures of Robin Hood) during a main event between the Giant (Big Show) and Hogan, and came back to the match during commercial breaks of that show. It was just a one time deal to promote that new show.
|
|
|
Post by bamblink on Mar 23, 2010 18:17:25 GMT -5
yea they got to much ads
|
|
Mozenrath
FANatic
Foppery and Whim
Speedy Speed Boy
Posts: 121,258
|
Post by Mozenrath on Mar 23, 2010 19:10:20 GMT -5
did WCW use to do this? I remember they went to commercial during matches while WWF hardly ever did but I don't remember. WCW actually once broke to another SHOW (The New Adventures of Robin Hood) during a main event between the Giant (Big Show) and Hogan, and came back to the match during commercial breaks of that show. It was just a one time deal to promote that new show. That's hysterical. They should of had a Robin Hood themed wrestler. "Oooooh, Yeah-uh, I'm Sheriff Savage of Nottingham!"
|
|
Krimzon
Crow T. Robot
This guy is the man!
R.I.P. Deadpool
Posts: 43,870
|
Post by Krimzon on Mar 23, 2010 19:13:48 GMT -5
I like the quick look-ins during commercials. It's something no other wrestling company has done.
|
|
|
Post by Dr. Rosenrosen on Mar 23, 2010 19:20:46 GMT -5
i for one flipped to Raw every time there was a commercial break on TNA and EVERY time that i did, sure enough, Raw was on a commercial too...
now, that doesn't mean that they didn't go to/come back sooner from said breaks, it means that there were AT LEAST the same amount of commercial breaks on WWE's end.
i don't think it's fair to dog TNA for that, when WWE is at fault as well.
with the problems that TNA has right now trying to get their act together and put on a good show on Monday nights i for one don't hold the amount of commercial air time against them.
|
|
|
Post by Orange on Mar 23, 2010 19:27:18 GMT -5
i for one flipped to Raw every time there was a commercial break on TNA and EVERY time that i did, sure enough, Raw was on a commercial too... now, that doesn't mean that they didn't go to/come back sooner from said breaks, it means that there were AT LEAST the same amount of commercial breaks on WWE's end. i don't think it's fair to dog TNA for that, when WWE is at fault as well. with the problems that TNA has right now trying to get their act together and put on a good show on Monday nights i for one don't hold the amount of commercial air time against them. No no no I'm not dogging them, just the way they worded it made it funny was all. I understand that WWE takes a lot of commercials as well and they're necessary, just the whole wording behind it was funny was all I was saying ![:)](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/smiley/smiley.png)
|
|
|
Post by Ryushinku on Mar 24, 2010 13:12:06 GMT -5
WCW actually once broke to another SHOW (The New Adventures of Robin Hood) during a main event between the Giant (Big Show) and Hogan, and came back to the match during commercial breaks of that show. It was just a one time deal to promote that new show. The beautiful thing is that they tried to legit play it off that Hogan and Giant had a 35+ minute bout, continuing on throughout Robin Hood being shown.
|
|
|
Post by Dr. Rosenrosen on Mar 24, 2010 14:36:18 GMT -5
i for one flipped to Raw every time there was a commercial break on TNA and EVERY time that i did, sure enough, Raw was on a commercial too... now, that doesn't mean that they didn't go to/come back sooner from said breaks, it means that there were AT LEAST the same amount of commercial breaks on WWE's end. i don't think it's fair to dog TNA for that, when WWE is at fault as well. with the problems that TNA has right now trying to get their act together and put on a good show on Monday nights i for one don't hold the amount of commercial air time against them. No no no I'm not dogging them, just the way they worded it made it funny was all. I understand that WWE takes a lot of commercials as well and they're necessary, just the whole wording behind it was funny was all I was saying ![:)](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/smiley/smiley.png) oh i know...and i wholly agree with your sentiment i thought the same thing myself when i was watching, and my statement wasn't directed at you at all, i just saw some people acting like it's TNAs fault how many commercial breaks they have and act like they're the only ones that do that. sorry, didn't mean to offend you specifically... ;D
|
|
|
Post by Orange on Mar 24, 2010 19:57:51 GMT -5
No no no I'm not dogging them, just the way they worded it made it funny was all. I understand that WWE takes a lot of commercials as well and they're necessary, just the whole wording behind it was funny was all I was saying ![:)](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/smiley/smiley.png) oh i know...and i wholly agree with your sentiment i thought the same thing myself when i was watching, and my statement wasn't directed at you at all, i just saw some people acting like it's TNAs fault how many commercial breaks they have and act like they're the only ones that do that. sorry, didn't mean to offend you specifically... ;D No don't worry you didn't ![;)](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/smiley/wink.png) I agree though that it's out of TNA's hands how many commercials they take, but I guess they gotta pay for stuff somehow.
|
|
bagsley
Samurai Cop
Demolition Bear is da king of Ruthless.
Posts: 2,139
|
Post by bagsley on Mar 24, 2010 22:45:58 GMT -5
WCW actually once broke to another SHOW (The New Adventures of Robin Hood) during a main event between the Giant (Big Show) and Hogan, and came back to the match during commercial breaks of that show. It was just a one time deal to promote that new show. That's hysterical. They should of had a Robin Hood themed wrestler. "Oooooh, Yeah-uh, I'm Sheriff Savage of Nottingham!" I would love to see that gimmick.
|
|
Sajoa Moe
Patti Mayonnaise
Did you get that thing I sent ya?
A man without gimmick.
Posts: 39,683
|
Post by Sajoa Moe on Mar 24, 2010 22:49:01 GMT -5
I like the quick look-ins during commercials. It's something no other wrestling company has done. I like it too. It prevents people from changing channels during the commercials.
|
|