josh
Bubba Ho-Tep
Posts: 604
|
Post by josh on May 31, 2010 16:15:56 GMT -5
In the past week they've removed
A) All 1993 RAWs
B) All 1994 RAWs
C) All ECW Legacy Shows
D) All Hogan/Flair "themed" vids
And to compensate we've gotten...
A) One episode of WCW Saturday Night
...
|
|
|
|
Post by Drillbit Taylor on May 31, 2010 16:19:35 GMT -5
I think they are getting ready for their own network, so removing it creates more intrest then if it was available.
|
|
josh
Bubba Ho-Tep
Posts: 604
|
Post by josh on May 31, 2010 16:22:05 GMT -5
I think they are getting ready for their own network, so removing it creates more intrest then if it was available. I still don't think it gives them an excuse to remove this massive amount of videos without warning. |
|
|
|
Post by sunwukong on May 31, 2010 16:30:18 GMT -5
I think they are getting ready for their own network, so removing it creates more intrest then if it was available. I still don't think it gives them an excuse to remove this massive amount of videos without warning. It's their site. They can do whatever they want without warning. |
|
|
|
Post by Killah Ray on May 31, 2010 16:36:14 GMT -5
I just wish Time Warner would carry the on demand channel. When I first switched to them 2 years ago, they told me they were in negotiations for the channel and every time I call to ask about it I get the same negotiating crap....
|
|
josh
Bubba Ho-Tep
Posts: 604
|
Post by josh on May 31, 2010 16:36:33 GMT -5
I still don't think it gives them an excuse to remove this massive amount of videos without warning. It's their site. They can do whatever they want without warning. Not when I'm paying for this service. |
|
|
|
Post by Gopher Mod on May 31, 2010 16:42:50 GMT -5
It's their site. They can do whatever they want without warning. Not when I'm paying for this service. Yeah, they can. Best bet for you is to stop watching the online service. |
|
josh
Bubba Ho-Tep
Posts: 604
|
Post by josh on May 31, 2010 16:47:05 GMT -5
Not when I'm paying for this service. Yeah, they can. Best bet for you is to stop watching the online service. Don't be sheepish. That's horrible customer service and there's no excuse for it. |
|
|
|
Post by boomhauer20055 on May 31, 2010 17:20:50 GMT -5
I canceled my online subscription
Problem solved
|
|
|
|
Post by Raja Lion on May 31, 2010 17:23:25 GMT -5
I just wish Time Warner would carry the on demand channel. When I first switched to them 2 years ago, they told me they were in negotiations for the channel and every time I call to ask about it I get the same negotiating crap.... I dont think you're missing much. The online has or had a LOT more content. Once in a while On Demand has some good stuff, but its a fairly slim pick every month. They do hit every now and then though. |
|
|
|
Post by Gopher Mod on May 31, 2010 17:30:58 GMT -5
Yeah, they can. Best bet for you is to stop watching the online service. Don't be sheepish. That's horrible customer service and there's no excuse for it. I'm not being sheepish. WWE has full control over their media library, and it changes every month. It is the way they work, not horrible customer service. |
|
josh
Bubba Ho-Tep
Posts: 604
|
Post by josh on May 31, 2010 17:37:03 GMT -5
Don't be sheepish. That's horrible customer service and there's no excuse for it. I'm not being sheepish. WWE has full control over their media library, and it changes every month. It is the way they work, not horrible customer service. My main complaint is removing that large of a portion without warning. Netflix gives warnings, WWE's TV service tells you when shows expire, there's no excuse for this. |
|
franchisedavis
Unicron
Called it.
Enter your message here...
Posts: 2,581
|
Post by franchisedavis on May 31, 2010 18:04:58 GMT -5
Netflix should just pay WWE whatever they need to so they can stream the WWE's PPVs and DVD's. Or else WWE should come up with something like that to stream to 360s and PS3s
|
|
|
|
Post by Alex Shelley on May 31, 2010 18:37:17 GMT -5
Wow, I'm glad I didn't renew my subscription this month...
|
|
AriadosMan
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Your friendly neighborhood superhero
Posts: 15,620
|
Post by AriadosMan on May 31, 2010 18:38:39 GMT -5
How is WWEClassics.com different from the WWE On Demand Classics channell? Why not just show the same programming on both?
|
|
|
|
Post by darthpipes on May 31, 2010 19:42:07 GMT -5
Question...will the new WWE network eliminate WWE Classics on Demand.
|
|
AriadosMan
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Your friendly neighborhood superhero
Posts: 15,620
|
Post by AriadosMan on May 31, 2010 19:43:34 GMT -5
Question...will the new WWE network eliminate WWE Classics on Demand. Most likely it will use the exact same programming, so I'm betting yes. |
|
Paco
Hank Scorpio
Posts: 7,145
|
Post by Paco on May 31, 2010 20:16:31 GMT -5
In the past week they've removed A) All 1993 RAWs B) All 1994 RAWs C) All ECW Legacy Shows D) All Hogan/Flair "themed" vids And to compensate we've gotten... A) One episode of WCW Saturday Night ... I think they've removed all bloodfest matches too. Probable reasons (as dumb as they may be) for the removals: A & B) The Early RAW Season Sets that may be coming up C) No Blood D) Well, duh... |
|
barley96
Dennis Stamp
This is the biggest Mickie James mark
Posts: 4,170
|
Post by barley96 on May 31, 2010 20:23:11 GMT -5
I thought WWE On Demand/Classics was overrated.
|
|
|
|
Post by captaineasychord on Jun 2, 2010 22:39:53 GMT -5
Just got my automatic subscription renewal notice and checked out the site. In addition to all of the Hogan and Flair stuff, RVD and the Hardys' pages have been removed (it's a conspiracy I tell you). Pleased to see WCWSN added but I wish they'd gone back further than 95. The ECW shows will be missed, but I couldn't sit through those 93-94 Raw episodes back then and I sure as hell can't stomach them now. Still, for $4 a month, as long as what they do post actually works, I can't complain too loudly.
|
|
