|
|
Post by Allison Reynolds on Jul 23, 2006 22:02:26 GMT -5
Wasn't the Batista vs. Henry Match supposed to be #1 contender? Then Kennedy took Mark Henry's place in the match. Then Batista lost that match by DQ. So does that mean Ken Kennedy is the #1 contender for King Booker's Title now?
|
|
|
|
Post by elassowipo on Jul 23, 2006 22:03:40 GMT -5
Mr. Kennedy will job eventually.
JOB!
|
|
|
|
Post by #Classic Hi-Definition X on Jul 23, 2006 22:04:23 GMT -5
They never said that match was a #1 contenders match.
|
|
|
|
Post by marvelocity on Jul 23, 2006 22:04:54 GMT -5
I'm sure the move was made to throw off anyone who thought the result would be predictable, and Batista will win the #1 Conterdership from Kennedy in the coming weeks.
Which is too bad for Kennedy, but Booker/Batista will be an interesting feud.
|
|
|
|
Post by mysterydriver on Jul 23, 2006 22:07:05 GMT -5
What...did Batista do his "Animal snap" and hit Mr. Kennedy with a lot of weapons?
The WWE really must have been looking for anything to keep the crowd interested. I bet it shocked many of them when Batista lost his return back, even if by DQ.
Maybe people should drop out three days before PPVs more often.
|
|
|
|
Post by Allison Reynolds on Jul 23, 2006 22:07:51 GMT -5
So now I'm thinking the "#1 Contender" stipulation part in that match was taken out after Mark Henry was injured huh.
|
|
