Better Roster: WWF 2000 vs WWE 2010

[Deleted]

Which part of history had a better roster?

[The Cool Pup]

2010. The product of the ring is much better now than in 2000 in many ways. Lots of new faces that are going to lead the new generation in.

[Cyno]

I voted for 2000. But thinking about it some more, I have to give it to 2010. I think 2000 still has a better product overall. But 2010 has a lot of the stars that helped make 2000 great (Edge, Christian, Jericho, Triple H, 'Taker, Big Show, Kane, etc.) and a lot of exciting new talent like Orton, Cena, Bryan, CM Punk, Barrett, etc.

[Bo Rida]

For those who need help remembering who was around in 2000:

SPOILER: Click to show

{Spoiler}
ROSTER
Steve Austin
Mick Foley
The Rock
Undertaker
Kane
Tazz
Jerry Lawler
Billy Gunn
D-Lo Brown
Crash Holly
Naked Mideon
Mark Henry
Essa Rios
Edge
Christian
Jeff Hardy
Matt Hardy
Bradshaw
Farooq
X-Pac
Roaddog
K-Kwik
Grandmaster Sexay
Scotty Too Hotty
Rikishi
Steve Blackman
Al Snow
Armbar
Taka Michinoku
Sho Funaki
Triple H
Vince McMahon
Shane McMahon
The Big Show
Chris Jericho
Kurt Angle
William Regal
British Bulldog
Hardcore Holly
Val Venis
Gangrel
Viscera
Chris Benoit
Eddie Guerrero
Dean Malenko
Perry Saturn
Bubba Dudley
Dvon Dudley
Test
Albert
Steven Richards
Goodfather
Bull Buchanan
Big Bossman
Rodney
Pete Gas
Joey Abs

DIVAS
Chyna
Trish Stratus
Lita
Ivory
Jacqueline
The Kat
BB
Terri
Luna Vachon
Tori
Debra

OTHER
Pat Patterson
Jerry Brisco
Bob Backlund
Fabulous Moolah
Mae Young

[Bam Neeley]

Punk>Austin

[Junkenstein]

As much as I've enjoyed the WWE in 2010 and I think it's been an all-round great year, roster-wise I have to give it to 2000.

[The Ichi]

The in-ring product is better today, but the 2000 roster was at it's best. Say what you will about the amount of crap on there, but it still had Austin, The Rock, Kurt Angle, Chris Jericho, Chris Benoit, Eddie Guerrero and a much healthier HHH, Kane and Undertaker.

[jivesoulbrah]

Essa Rios alone is better then most of the roster today.

[Macho Dude Handy Damage]

Gotta go with 2000. If for nothing else than the fact that I actually cared more about those characters than I do with most of the current roster.

[jabronidrive]

Two of the three greatest wrestlers of all time were active in 2000. Enough said.

[YYYWID]

Armbar was one of the greatest of all time

["The Rated XXX Superstar" Jed]

Why do I not remember Essa Rios?

[Prince of Darkness]

It's too early to judge, but I'm going with 2000. You had the Radicalz, the McMahon-Helmsley Era, Commissioner Foley, Kurt Angle, The Rock, Chris Jericho, the Undertaker, and because the shows were unified, matches got a better buildup despite the frequent PPV's. So what would normally be an eight week angle could be done in four.

[Beets by Schrute]

2000! Why? Because i was a big Rikishi mark.

[Deleted]

Oct 20, 2010 13:16:22 GMT -5 Bam Neeley said:

Punk>Austin

[fw91]

Pete Gas> Cena

[Dr. Bolty, Disaster Enby]

2000's roster was just stacked beyond belief.

Today's WWE roster is also very stacked, but it doesn't have the wealth of experienced, world-traveled one-of-a-kind wrestlers that 2000 had.

Not to mention the delicious, delicious tag division. MMMM.

[Krimzon]

How is this even this close? 2000 by FAR.

[Peeetah]

One of these rosters had Scotty 2 Hotty one of them does not.

[Big L]

2000