Grendel
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
But ... why is all the rum gone?
Posts: 17,593
|
Post by Grendel on Jan 25, 2011 9:28:11 GMT -5
Yet I would probably eat it. Bacon wrapped Amanda Seyfried is an important part of a balanced diet. But I haven't had any Bacon wrapped Amanda Seyfried. I need some, stat!
|
|
|
Post by Bang Bang Bart on Jan 25, 2011 9:29:17 GMT -5
Bacon-wrapped Amanda Seyfried with waffles & syrup? Yes, please! ;D
|
|
|
Post by Bake Or Die on Jan 25, 2011 10:16:30 GMT -5
Bacon wrapped Amanda Seyfried? Since when did everyone become...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 25, 2011 10:36:47 GMT -5
Bacon-wrapped Amanda Seyfried with waffles & syrup? Yes, please! ;D Well great, now I'm going to be thinking about Amanda Seyfried wrapped in bacon, drenched in syrup. Thanks a bunch. Seriously, thanks a bunch, that is an awesome thing to think about.
|
|
|
Post by Rococo on Jan 25, 2011 10:55:20 GMT -5
Well since you just said SPvTW is the same as Juno in terms of the hipster cap, then I don't feel you do. If that's your opinion so be it, but I think you're wrong. Try reading a little closer & maybe you'll see what I was saying. Because you're obviously not understanding. In all fairness, you replied to this; Actually... yeah, that's pretty much how Juno came across to me. I didn't get the emotion you did, it was mostly hipster dialogue from all the characters surrounding the brief emotional sequences like an oreo with half as much frosting as normalwith, "You must hate Scott Pilgrim" - i.e. Scott Pilgrim is the same or is equatable to Juno in terms of dialogue/characterisation/"hipsterism" etc. Given that two people called you out on it, don't you think it was more an issue of your lack of expansion, rather than our inability to comprehend what you were writing?
|
|
Grendel
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
But ... why is all the rum gone?
Posts: 17,593
|
Post by Grendel on Jan 25, 2011 11:03:14 GMT -5
Bacon-wrapped Amanda Seyfried with waffles & syrup? Yes, please! ;D Well great, now I'm going to be thinking about Amanda Seyfried wrapped in bacon, drenched in syrup. Thanks a bunch. Seriously, thanks a bunch, that is an awesome thing to think about. Oh yeah. And then if she dipped a piece of French Toast in the syrup, then held it out to you while asking "Want a taste?"
|
|
|
Post by Bake Or Die on Jan 25, 2011 11:24:50 GMT -5
Try reading a little closer & maybe you'll see what I was saying. Because you're obviously not understanding. In all fairness, you replied to this; Actually... yeah, that's pretty much how Juno came across to me. I didn't get the emotion you did, it was mostly hipster dialogue from all the characters surrounding the brief emotional sequences like an oreo with half as much frosting as normalwith, "You must hate Scott Pilgrim" - i.e. Scott Pilgrim is the same or is equatable to Juno in terms of dialogue/characterisation/"hipsterism" etc. Given that two people called you out on it, don't you think it was more an issue of your lack of expansion, rather than our inability to comprehend what you were writing? Nope. It's definitely your guys inability to decipher what I meant.I'm not the type to break down everything I say because someone else doesn't understand what I'm trying to say. And that's obviously what happened when you & whoever else asumed that I said Scott Pilgrim & Juno are the same type of movie. I'm a Scott Pilgrim fanatic so for anyone to suggest I'm not is an insult.
|
|
bob
Salacious Crumb
The "other" Bob. FOC COURSE!
started the Madness Wars, Proudly the #1 Nana Hater on FAN
Posts: 78,695
Member is Online
|
Post by bob on Jan 25, 2011 11:26:48 GMT -5
so is Scott Pilgrim as bad as Jennifer's Body, although I doubt anything can possibly be worse, or is it good?
|
|
|
Post by Bake Or Die on Jan 25, 2011 11:29:45 GMT -5
so is Scott Pilgrim as bad as Jennifer's Body, although I doubt anything can possibly be worse, or is it good? Scott Pilgrim is pretty critically acclaimed. It's nowhere near bad. Some consider it the best movie of the year.
|
|
|
Post by Bang Bang Bart on Jan 25, 2011 11:30:13 GMT -5
Don't compare the two, seriously. SP is miles better than Jennifer's Body. Hell, like ten thousand miles better.
But not as good as a bacon-wrapped Amanda Seyfried with waffles & syrup. (Actually, it's just as good as that).
|
|
|
Post by Bake Or Die on Jan 25, 2011 11:32:18 GMT -5
Seriously bacon wrapped anything and things covered in syrup could lead to heart problems,diabetes & obesity.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 25, 2011 11:34:02 GMT -5
Well great, now I'm going to be thinking about Amanda Seyfried wrapped in bacon, drenched in syrup. Thanks a bunch. Seriously, thanks a bunch, that is an awesome thing to think about. Oh yeah. And then if she dipped a piece of French Toast in the syrup, then held it out to you while asking "Want a taste?" This is the kind of scenario that should be in a movie. Preferably every movie.
|
|
|
Post by Rococo on Jan 25, 2011 11:35:48 GMT -5
In all fairness, you replied to this; Actually... yeah, that's pretty much how Juno came across to me. I didn't get the emotion you did, it was mostly hipster dialogue from all the characters surrounding the brief emotional sequences like an oreo with half as much frosting as normalwith, "You must hate Scott Pilgrim" - i.e. Scott Pilgrim is the same or is equatable to Juno in terms of dialogue/characterisation/"hipsterism" etc. Given that two people called you out on it, don't you think it was more an issue of your lack of expansion, rather than our inability to comprehend what you were writing? Nope. It's definitely your guys inability to decipher what I meant.I'm not the type to break down everything I say because someone else doesn't understand what I'm trying to say. And that's obviously what happened when you & whoever else asumed that I said Scott Pilgrim & Juno are the same type of movie. I'm a Scott Pilgrim fanatic so for anyone to suggest I'm not is an insult. I'm not sure who you're trying to kid here (I'm trying to err on the side of caution here so that I adhere to the rules); you replied to a post wherein the person stated that they didn't enjoy Juno for the "hipster" dialogue/characters, to which you replied " You must hate Scott Pilgrim". Here's a question; if you weren't comparing the content of the films or comparing the films at all - why arbitrarily pick Scott Pilgrim and not, say, Winter's Bone? Why reply at all? You then wrote, "It features hipster dialogue,characters,etc" - so, of course you were comparing the two films. I quite obviously have no issues with comprehension; I'm not sure why you cannot just admit that you were wrong, instead of this bizarre back-tracking you are attempting to do in spite of your posts still existing for all to see. Also, HAHA @ you for posting something vague and expecting everyone to decipher what you mean and then claim that we have issues because we can't extrapolate what your intentions were from a five word post.
|
|
|
Post by Bake Or Die on Jan 25, 2011 12:16:20 GMT -5
Nope. It's definitely your guys inability to decipher what I meant.I'm not the type to break down everything I say because someone else doesn't understand what I'm trying to say. And that's obviously what happened when you & whoever else asumed that I said Scott Pilgrim & Juno are the same type of movie. I'm a Scott Pilgrim fanatic so for anyone to suggest I'm not is an insult. I'm not sure who you're trying to kid here (I'm trying to err on the side of caution here so that I adhere to the rules); you replied to a post wherein the person stated that they didn't enjoy Juno for the "hipster" dialogue/characters, to which you replied " You must hate Scott Pilgrim". Here's a question; if you weren't comparing the content of the films or comparing the films at all - why arbitrarily pick Scott Pilgrim and not, say, Winter's Bone? Why reply at all? You then wrote, "It features hipster dialogue,characters,etc" - so, of course you were comparing the two films. I quite obviously have no issues with comprehension; I'm not sure why you cannot just admit that you were wrong, instead of this bizarre back-tracking you are attempting to do in spite of your posts still existing for all to see. Also, HAHA @ you for posting something vague and expecting everyone to decipher what you mean and then claim that we have issues because we can't extrapolate what your intentions were from a five word post. Ok I'm not admitting I'm wrong because I'm not.The poster obviously didn't like Juno because of the hipster dialogue & hipsterisms of the characters so I said he probaby wouldn't like Scott Pilgrim because it has alot of hipster elements to it. I never said that the hipster elements in Scott Pilgrim were portrayed the same way they were in Juno.But if hipster styles,talk,people,etc isn't his thing he might want to avoid Scott Pilgrim because it deals with alot of hipster elements. Them being tounge in cheek or otherwise. I also like how you say you have no problem with comprehension but yet admit I posted something vague. So you really didn't comprehend at all. And why pick Scott Pilgrim as a comparison? Because the Scott Pilgrim franchise is one of my hobbies. I've seen the movie about 10 times,read the books several times & even RP as one of the characters on Twitter. So again I think I know enough about Scott Pilgrim for me to use it as an example. Now I'm done arguing with someone who wanted to call me out when they didn't even know what I meant. So have a nice day.
|
|
|
Post by Red Impact on Jan 25, 2011 12:59:32 GMT -5
The poster obviously didn't like Juno because of the hipster dialogue & hipsterisms of the characters so I said he probaby wouldn't like Scott Pilgrim because it has alot of hipster elements to it. That's a pretty big assumption on your part, as that's not what I said in my post. The dialogue contributed, but I could have overlooked what felt like stilted overpolished dialogue it if it felt like there was more to the movie than that. I just didn't get anything else. It didn't feel like there was more to the characters or to the story. It felt like lacked a lot of emotion, hence why I talked specifically about the emotion being vastly outweighed by that particular part of it. So I think you're wrong to assume that.
|
|
|
Post by Clash, Never a Meter Maid on Jan 25, 2011 13:05:35 GMT -5
I'm not sure who you're trying to kid here (I'm trying to err on the side of caution here so that I adhere to the rules); you replied to a post wherein the person stated that they didn't enjoy Juno for the "hipster" dialogue/characters, to which you replied " You must hate Scott Pilgrim". Here's a question; if you weren't comparing the content of the films or comparing the films at all - why arbitrarily pick Scott Pilgrim and not, say, Winter's Bone? Why reply at all? You then wrote, "It features hipster dialogue,characters,etc" - so, of course you were comparing the two films. I quite obviously have no issues with comprehension; I'm not sure why you cannot just admit that you were wrong, instead of this bizarre back-tracking you are attempting to do in spite of your posts still existing for all to see. Also, HAHA @ you for posting something vague and expecting everyone to decipher what you mean and then claim that we have issues because we can't extrapolate what your intentions were from a five word post. Ok I'm not admitting I'm wrong because I'm not.The poster obviously didn't like Juno because of the hipster dialogue & hipsterisms of the characters so I said he probaby wouldn't like Scott Pilgrim because it has alot of hipster elements to it. I never said that the hipster elements in Scott Pilgrim were portrayed the same way they were in Juno.But if hipster styles,talk,people,etc isn't his thing he might want to avoid Scott Pilgrim because it deals with alot of hipster elements. Them being tounge in cheek or otherwise. I also like how you say you have no problem with comprehension but yet admit I posted something vague. So you really didn't comprehend at all. And why pick Scott Pilgrim as a comparison? Because the Scott Pilgrim franchise is one of my hobbies. I've seen the movie about 10 times,read the books several times & even RP as one of the characters on Twitter. So again I think I know enough about Scott Pilgrim for me to use it as an example. Now I'm done arguing with someone who wanted to call me out when they didn't even know what I meant. So have a nice day. I suggest both of you move on. Now.
|
|
|
Post by Bang Bang Bart on Jan 25, 2011 13:08:56 GMT -5
Anyways, how 'bout that bacon-wrapped Amanda Seyfried?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 25, 2011 20:55:10 GMT -5
Anyways, how 'bout that bacon-wrapped Amanda Seyfried? I wish there were three Amanda Seyfrieds, so one of them could be bacon wrapped, one would be syrup-covered, and the other wearing a bikini made of waffles.
|
|
Jiren
Patti Mayonnaise
Hearts Bayformers
Posts: 35,163
|
Post by Jiren on Jan 25, 2011 21:04:10 GMT -5
A good Seyfried movie to watch is "Chloe"
All I can really say about it is
|
|
|
Post by Danimal on Jan 26, 2011 2:48:13 GMT -5
A good Seyfried movie to watch is "Chloe" All I can really say about it is Chloe is a good flick I don't think many people know about, got it on netflix. As far as the Juno discussion goes I don't see it as that hipster. The title-character is a semi-rebellious indie-rock chick after her the cast is pretty mainstream.
|
|