WWE vs TNA booking, in one sentence:

[Deleted]

It dawned on me after watching Raw and Impact this week, but I believe you can boil down the difference between the two brands in one sentence:

In TNA, wrestlers want the belt so they can have power, and in WWE, wrestlers want power so they can have the belt.

It can't be that simple, can it?

[EvenBaldobombHasAJob]

and in soviet russia, belt uses you for power

[i.Sarita.com]

The WWE is afraid to take chances, while TNA takes too many.

There, that's one sentence that sums up both of their booking.

[Welfare Willis]

Dec 10, 2010 10:01:39 GMT -5 @meanstreetposse said:

It dawned on me after watching Raw and Impact this week, but I believe you can boil down the difference between the two brands in one sentence:

In TNA, wrestlers want the belt so they can have power, and in WWE, wrestlers want power so they can have the belt.

It can't be that simple, can it?

I always thought that was a basic rule of pro wrestling: That wrestlers would do anything to get the belt. Whatever form it takes be it US Title, Cruiserweight, Hardcore, WWE, Etc. They'd fight or screw over one another to get the belt.

It only seems to have change since the 90's with the Fingerpoke of Doom and Vinnie Ru's crazy ideas.

[Jake, The Jake, Jake]

WWE is boring, TNA is a trainwreck.

[Deleted]

Dec 10, 2010 10:45:37 GMT -5 i.Sarita.com said:

The WWE is afraid to take chances, while TNA takes too many.

There, that's one sentence that sums up both of their booking.

I like this. Well said!

[________ has left the building]

One makes money, the other one doesn't.

[Big Daddy Bad Booking]

Dec 10, 2010 11:12:57 GMT -5 ________ has left the building said:

One makes money, the other one doesn't.

Which is why one is afraid to take chances while one takes too many!

[Celgress]

Dec 10, 2010 10:01:39 GMT -5 @meanstreetposse said:

It dawned on me after watching Raw and Impact this week, but I believe you can boil down the difference between the two brands in one sentence:

In TNA, wrestlers want the belt so they can have power, and in WWE, wrestlers want power so they can have the belt.

It can't be that simple, can it?

TNA booking v. WWE booking; this can't end well (both for TNA & the board)....

[MrBRulzOK]

Both Vinces are very stubborn in their own ways.

[corpen11]

WWE: The same old shit. TNA: Just shit.

[itssoeasy23]

One Vince is a booking genius, the other is a booking moron.

[JTG]

WWE booking is not very creative, but totally coherent, while TNA booking is a gigantic clusterf***

[8-BitAssassin]

WWE doesn't learn from their mistakes. TNA doesn't learn from WCW's mistakes.

[Hawk Hart]

WWE's Main Eventers have been around 5-10 years, TNA's Main Eventers have been around since the WWE Main Eventers were 5-10 years old.

[JTG]

WWE has less talented wrestlers, they book them not really good for some of them while TNA has a lot of talented wrestlers, all awfully booked

[DSR]

TNA bookers, they drive a car like this:

*hunches forward with both hands in front of him, sings a nerdy sounding song to himself*

Now WWE bookers, they drive a car like this:

*leans back casually with one hand in front of him, adding beatbox sounds*

[Hawk Hart]

Dec 10, 2010 14:13:04 GMT -5 DSR said:

TNA bookers, they drive a car like this:

*hunches forward with both hands in front of him, sings a nerdy sounding song to himself*

Now WWE bookers, they drive a car like this:

*leans back casually with one hand in front of him, adding beatbox sounds*

Russo: Ah ha ha, it's true, it's true! We're so lame!

[Citizen Grimm]

Dec 10, 2010 13:42:16 GMT -5 8-BitAssassin said:

WWE doesn't learn from their mistakes. TNA doesn't learn from WCW's mistakes.

Okay, that's damn funny right there. ;D

[r.]

WWE: Children's fintime learning hour

TNA: Late night B movie gore horror show