|
|
Post by Nic Nemeth on Jan 3, 2011 23:23:18 GMT -5
Steel Cage Match - I'm glad they didn't do a pin or submission win option tonight, but it should never be won by going through a door since everyone would just do that instead
Battle Royal - For some reason, almost every superstar goes over the same side of the ring
|
|
saintpat
El Dandy
Release the hounds!!!
Posts: 7,664
|
Post by saintpat on Jan 3, 2011 23:50:43 GMT -5
Both WCW and TNA have had spots where the ref has warned a wrestler in a no-DQ match for beating up an opponent who is in the ropes.
What are they going to do, DQ the guy?
|
|
|
|
Post by Bang Bang Bart on Jan 4, 2011 0:01:38 GMT -5
The Chairs Match, as seen in TLC. It's essentially a No-DQ match, only with more chairs added for effect. I mean, come on.
|
|
A/C Carcass
Trap-Jaw
Everyone is staring at me.
Posts: 409
|
Post by A/C Carcass on Jan 4, 2011 0:09:39 GMT -5
In the Divas' Table Match, it was obviously Natalya's fat belly that broke the table, therefore Laycool should have won!
|
|
Ben Wyatt
Crow T. Robot
Are You Gonna Go My Way?
I don't get it. At all. It's kind of a small horse, I mean what am I missing? Am I crazy?
Posts: 41,484
|
Post by Ben Wyatt on Jan 4, 2011 13:36:23 GMT -5
My complaint: They use gimmick matches (all of them) way too often to carry any major meaning. They used to be feud enders, that's how they should still be
|
|
|
|
Post by worldsstrongestman on Jan 4, 2011 13:55:45 GMT -5
Steel Cage match last night: Barrett could have escaped when Sheamus was busy with Orton. But he decides to help Sheamus fight Orton.
|
|
|
|
Post by Citizen Zero on Jan 4, 2011 13:56:39 GMT -5
All blindfold matches, ever. They should never exist.
|
|
|
|
Post by Summerfest on Jan 4, 2011 21:13:28 GMT -5
We need more Submissions Count Anywhere matches.
|
|
MrBRulzOK
Wade Wilson
Mr No-Pants Heathen
Something Witty Here.
Posts: 26,719
|
Post by MrBRulzOK on Jan 4, 2011 21:22:48 GMT -5
My complaint: They use gimmick matches (all of them) way too often to carry any major meaning. They used to be feud enders, that's how they should still be Agreed. |
|
|
|
Post by Clarence "Showstealer" Mason on Jan 4, 2011 21:22:50 GMT -5
I hate the WWE way they book Triple Threat or Fatal 4 Way matches. There seems to be always some spot where one guy is going to take out another by putting him through the announce table/throwing him off something/hitting his finisher on the concrete only for the other guy to come and stop him. I mean what the f*** dude? Don't you want it to be just a one on one match? That's always bugged me for some reason
|
|
|
|
Post by YellowJacketY2J on Jan 4, 2011 21:26:48 GMT -5
My complaint: They use gimmick matches (all of them) way too often to carry any major meaning. They used to be feud enders, that's how they should still be My sentiments exactly. They need to use them sparingly. |
|
