|
Post by ben:friendship frog on Jul 29, 2011 12:33:00 GMT -5
Just a wild guess but judging from R-Truth's & The Miz's reactions to the new WWE COO, Triple H, i'm guessing there's gonna be a group of wrestlers who oppose him. Which will probably lead to a Vince return near WrestleMania or something? If they are then I like how they planted the seeds, the R-Truth one was slightly more obvious but The Miz's promo was great, if there's a couple more on Smackdown complaining then it will all fit together nicely
|
|
Turd Ferguson
Hank Scorpio
John Cena: Colossal Douche
Posts: 7,402
|
Post by Turd Ferguson on Jul 29, 2011 12:37:05 GMT -5
A WWE Civil War? I smell a new meme!
Just kidding. This has been discussed a lot, but you do bring a good insight into how this may actually come to fruition.
|
|
King Ghidorah
El Dandy
On Probation for Charges of two counts of Saxual Music.
How Absurd
Posts: 8,330
|
Post by King Ghidorah on Jul 29, 2011 12:47:02 GMT -5
Miz corporate champ, I can dig it.
|
|
|
Post by may19th on Jul 29, 2011 12:48:45 GMT -5
In other news did Cole slip up calling him the "Chief operating officer" or is that his new title?
'cause I always thought it was CEO yo.
|
|
|
Post by Michael Coello on Jul 29, 2011 12:50:38 GMT -5
A group of WWE guys who don't like management trying to revolt?
Why does this sound so familiar?
|
|
Jobes
Unicron
Posts: 3,199
|
Post by Jobes on Jul 29, 2011 12:51:07 GMT -5
In other news did Cole slip up calling him the "Chief operating officer" or is that his new title? 'cause I always thought it was CEO yo. COO is correct.
|
|
|
Post by Todd Pettengill on Jul 29, 2011 13:04:50 GMT -5
In other news did Cole slip up calling him the "Chief operating officer" or is that his new title? 'cause I always thought it was CEO yo. COO is correct. Yeah, technically they're not allowed to call someone other than Vince the CEO. COO is Triple H's position.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 29, 2011 13:09:35 GMT -5
Sounds more like a coup to me. Uprising would be if a bunch of wrestlers got mad with management and attempted to form their own stable/fed with their own matches and own governance within WWE. Or ambushed regular WWE guys/divas backstage in an attempt to strike terror into the mainline's heart and legitimize things.
|
|
|
Post by Sumbody Gon' Get Dey Kneelift on Jul 29, 2011 13:17:26 GMT -5
Sounds more like a coup to me. Uprising would be if a bunch of wrestlers got mad with management and attempted to form their own stable/fed with their own matches and own governance within WWE. Or ambushed regular WWE guys/divas backstage in an attempt to strike terror into the mainline's heart and legitimize things. www.youtube.com/watch?v=NWZ0gJ0HAyA
|
|
The G.O.A.T.
Don Corleone
This post may or may not be credited to Rajah.com
Posts: 1,433
|
Post by The G.O.A.T. on Jul 29, 2011 13:34:44 GMT -5
Sounds more like a coup to me. Uprising would be if a bunch of wrestlers got mad with management and attempted to form their own stable/fed with their own matches and own governance within WWE. Or ambushed regular WWE guys/divas backstage in an attempt to strike terror into the mainline's heart and legitimize things. Sounds kinda like an old wcw angle As long as nash makes rey mysterio a dart again, I'm all for it
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 29, 2011 13:36:16 GMT -5
Sounds more like a coup to me. Uprising would be if a bunch of wrestlers got mad with management and attempted to form their own stable/fed with their own matches and own governance within WWE. Or ambushed regular WWE guys/divas backstage in an attempt to strike terror into the mainline's heart and legitimize things. www.youtube.com/watch?v=NWZ0gJ0HAyAPretty much, yeah. And we saw how well nWo went over before it got unwieldy.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 29, 2011 13:37:59 GMT -5
I think we'll see heels complaining that they're getting screwed by managment, which isn't exactly revolutionary.
|
|
|
Post by John Cena's Boner on Jul 29, 2011 13:40:54 GMT -5
So... Uprising = The UNION Coup = nWo
Never mind that s***, I'm all for a Civil War!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 29, 2011 13:46:16 GMT -5
So... Uprising = The UNION Coup = nWo I think you got the two reversed there. And actually, a legit "rebellion" stable would be a big change of pace. Nexus really wasn't. Rather than being independent, they were basically trying to take over the company by winning the titles and eliminating management. But they also weren't a coup because they had no real endgame (they could've with the "Bigger Picture" but it never really panned out).
|
|
Allie Kitsune
Crow T. Robot
Always Feelin' Foxy.
HaHa U FaLL 4 LaVa TriK
Posts: 46,900
|
Post by Allie Kitsune on Jul 29, 2011 13:49:12 GMT -5
It'd be amazing if people actually showed up with "TRUTH WAS RIGHT" signs.
|
|
|
Post by John Cena's Boner on Jul 29, 2011 14:15:07 GMT -5
So... Uprising = The UNION Coup = nWo I think you got the two reversed there. Well uprising implies they are actually in the company, which the Union were. They were, essentially, disgruntled employees who had issues with the Corporate Ministry and were rebelling against the system. Hell, you could say that Steve Austin was an "upriser", but the better word to describe him would be "rebel", however the two are synonymous. Uprising doesn't necessarily mean they have their own separate fed within a fed. The nWo were "Outsiders" who were trying to take over WCW, therefore making it a coup.
|
|