|
|
Post by joey joe joe junior shabadoo on Aug 15, 2011 7:11:14 GMT -5
|
|
Paco
Hank Scorpio
Posts: 7,145
|
Post by Paco on Aug 15, 2011 7:18:00 GMT -5
Not an error. CM Punk did not get a second reign last night.
|
|
|
|
Post by Red Impact on Aug 15, 2011 7:19:07 GMT -5
Technically, Punk was already champion, so it's not a new reign.
|
|
|
|
Post by joey joe joe junior shabadoo on Aug 15, 2011 7:21:59 GMT -5
yes he did, he pinned John Cena, the announcers declared him the new undisputed WWE champion, Triple H raised his arm and then he was beaten by Del Rio in a match quite soon after!
it's a minute or so long WWE title reign that the WWE aren't recognising!
|
|
|
|
Post by Mighty Attack Tribble on Aug 15, 2011 7:26:25 GMT -5
yes he did, he pinned John Cena, the announcers declared him the new undisputed WWE champion, Triple H raised his arm and then he was beaten by Del Rio in a match quite soon after! it's a minute or so long WWE title reign that the WWE aren't recognising! Not really. He never lost the title after initially winning it at MITB until Del Rio beat him. |
|
|
|
Post by Red Impact on Aug 15, 2011 7:26:41 GMT -5
You'd be correct if the Undisputed title was a new title, but it's the same championship. He could only have a new reign if he lost the belt before or it was retired, as it stands there was controversy that got sorted out, but no new reign was going to come out of it.
|
|
Steveweiser
Dalek
Mickie Mickie You're So Fine... Hey Mickie!
THE GRAPS
Posts: 50,249
|
Post by Steveweiser on Aug 15, 2011 7:35:58 GMT -5
I think in their belief, Cena's reign is null and void, and Punk won the right to continue the reign he started at MITB.
|
|
|
|
Post by joey joe joe junior shabadoo on Aug 15, 2011 7:36:02 GMT -5
actually yeah I see what you mean now. because of there being 2 champions the stipulation for the Punk/Cena match was whoever loses gets stripped of their title!
|
|
Steveweiser
Dalek
Mickie Mickie You're So Fine... Hey Mickie!
THE GRAPS
Posts: 50,249
|
Post by Steveweiser on Aug 15, 2011 7:38:56 GMT -5
That would also mean that Mysterio's two hour reign is also null and void. Poor thing can't catch a break.
|
|
Paco
Hank Scorpio
Posts: 7,145
|
Post by Paco on Aug 15, 2011 7:40:17 GMT -5
Cena and Rey's reigns are still official. Don't feel bad for Rey-Rey.
|
|
Cronant
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Posts: 17,556
|
Post by Cronant on Aug 15, 2011 7:40:28 GMT -5
Its not null and void. They're still counting it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Red Impact on Aug 15, 2011 7:44:00 GMT -5
It pretty much means that John Cena's title reign ended at 10:35 or so, and Punk's ended at 10:45 or so.
|
|
"Hollywood" Cactus Matt
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
You couldn't ask for a better custom title!
How do you spell "Goddess"? C-H-R-I-S-T-Y!
Posts: 15,300
|
Post by "Hollywood" Cactus Matt on Aug 15, 2011 11:25:23 GMT -5
Look in the "won it from" section. It says Del Rio beat Punk; it never says that Punk beat Cena for it that same night.
I don't really understand how Rey's and Cena's interim reigns are "official." I mean, look at the page.
John Cena wins the title from Rey Mysterio. Then, Alberto Del Rio beats C.M. Punk for the title. Well, how the hell did that happen if Cena was the champion?
All the need is one more Punk reign listed, or at the very least an asterisk somewhere. I mean, what happens five years from now if someone is looking at the title history who is unfamiliar with this angle? They're gonna be confused.
|
|
|
|
Post by Protest the Chris Hero on Aug 15, 2011 11:29:12 GMT -5
Gotta lose it first before you win it back buddy  |
|
