Feuds on Heat

[mysterydriver]

Does anyone think that a Heat feud will ever make it to RAW. When it was on TV regularly, Heat main event feuds where good for opening match fodder.

However, now the only time I see someone from Heat is when Big Show and Kane need to show how dominant they are.

Heat actually started something of a Murdoch/Goldust feud where Murdoch walked out on the first match and the second (the Main event of Heat that week) had the old "pinned guy raises shoulder and the other guy is too lazy to lift his" ending that leaves things open and then....

Murdoch jobs to RVD on RAW and no one mentions anything. Goldust faces Conway on the opening match of Heat. Nothing...

Is Heat that unimportant? Why have it if you won't use it? They could probably increase the amount of online viewers if they could alert more people of it.

I know I focus on Heat, but all I get is RAW and therefore I follow it more. Velocity is good for recapping Smackdown, introduced me to Lashley, and is actually used to move forward the CW division. Heat? Absolutely nothing.

Anyone?

[Chainsaw]

To be honest, I haven't watched Heat or Velocity since it moved off TV. Which drives me nuts when they set stuff up on the shows.

I didn't even know that London and Spanky had that crazy mask gimmick until they showed up to job on SD.

[nisi]

I don't get the point of Heat & Velocity as webcasts. The people who like the more wrestling, less gimmick format don't much like having to watch it on a computer, I would think. WWE doesn't seem to be doing much to try to get these shows back on air somewhere. I would rather have them as webcasts than gone, but I wish they were were back on TV.

[Vice honcho room temperature]

nisi said:

I don't get the point of Heat & Velocity as webcasts. The people who like the more wrestling, less gimmick format don't much like having to watch it on a computer, I would think. WWE doesn't seem to be doing much to try to get these shows back on air somewhere. I would rather have them as webcasts than gone, but I wish they were were back on TV.

I think there are International shows that they still have to film for I guess. They just put it on the web for the Us viewers.

[nisi]

Right, I've heard that too, I didn't realize WWE had contractal TV obligations overseas but it makes sense.

[mysterydriver]

I just wish they would fish out more feuds on Heat.

It may discourage those who don't watch Internet Heat, but it may encourage others to go to the site.

[Reverend BTY]

I prefer Velocity. Faster paced, has the Kendron crazy masks, and The Mexicools. The only thing Heat has to offer me is the Snitsky/Tomko team. Anyway, I wish the pushes on the webshows would flesh out into feuds on RAW and Smackdown. Have them start online, show what happened via replay on Smackdown, have a match as the opener. Of course, this makes sense so it won't happen.

[sunwukong]

Can you imagine being called up to the WWE only to appear on a f***ing webcast?

I thought Heat and Velocity were largely useless when they were on TV. They had their fans, but they weren't THAT important. Now they're really meaningless.

[RealDoubleJ]

i miss Stevie Night Heat.

[mysterydriver]

Do you think anyone from Heat will get a title shot?

Viscera has had a big singles winning streak on Heat, beating Tomko, Snitsky, Conway, and other people most of you want fired.

Normally this would be buildup for something instead of time filler for the "Internet show."

On a slow night (In between gimmicks), they could easily have Viscera challenge Shelton, or whoever the champ may be, for the IC title. Of course he wouldn't win, but atleast they could show that "getting a hot streak of wins" could earn wrestlers a title shot.

Also, I too miss Stevie Night Heat.

[parttimer]

Heat doesn't exist. Next.