|
|
Post by juvijuiceisloose on Nov 18, 2011 21:58:38 GMT -5
Its a cool poster but I cant help but notice the token girl and token black guy on it. Also where's Hemsworth ? The black guy is Terry Crews. He was in the 1st one. |
|
|
|
Post by Non Banjoble Tokens on Nov 18, 2011 22:57:53 GMT -5
The first Expendables got me pregnant and I'm scared and intrigued as to what this one will do to me.
|
|
|
|
Post by DrBackflipsHoffman on Nov 18, 2011 23:01:41 GMT -5
None of them appear to be blubbering like little kids, which as far as I can remember about that god awful first film the one time I managed to force myself to watch it is what nearly of it consists of in between inciredibly boring ham fisted kiddie safe action
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 18, 2011 23:04:20 GMT -5
The first Expendables got me pregnant and I'm scared and intrigued as to what this one will do to me. Twins. And they'll poop gunpowder. |
|
|
|
Post by DrBackflipsHoffman on Nov 18, 2011 23:10:53 GMT -5
Although on the positive side, since everyone asked where JCVD and Chuck Norris were for the first movie, this might mean for the third movie we might get Michael Dudikoff, Wings Hauser and Bill Duke if enough people ask
|
|
Paco
Hank Scorpio
Posts: 7,145
|
Post by Paco on Nov 18, 2011 23:12:40 GMT -5
I find it almost amusing that Mickey Rourke's not in this one. Its like they realized he was only one giving a genuine and underplayed performance in a cheesy action flick and concluded they had to get rid of him. Rourke left the sequel to do another movie... and got replaced in THAT movie (by Woody Harrelson). So Rourke ends up with nothing  |
|
|
|
Post by Zaq "That Guy" Buzzkill on Nov 18, 2011 23:14:05 GMT -5
They should get Mr.T for the third film, and have him in a fight scene with Norris.
|
|
|
|
Post by DrBackflipsHoffman on Nov 18, 2011 23:14:36 GMT -5
They should get Mr.T for the third film, and have him in a fight scene with Norris. Concluding with them crying and hugging |
|
|
|
Post by Non Banjoble Tokens on Nov 18, 2011 23:15:24 GMT -5
None of them appear to be blubbering like little kids, which as far as I can remember about that god awful first film the one time I managed to force myself to watch it is what nearly of it consists of in between inciredibly boring ham fisted kiddie safe action Kiddie safe action? Did you miss the various parts where Stallone was lopping people's body parts of with a bowie knife or when people were getting blasted in half by massive guns? |
|
|
|
Post by DrBackflipsHoffman on Nov 18, 2011 23:16:21 GMT -5
None of them appear to be blubbering like little kids, which as far as I can remember about that god awful first film the one time I managed to force myself to watch it is what nearly of it consists of in between inciredibly boring ham fisted kiddie safe action Kiddie safe action? Did you miss the various parts where Stallone was lopping people's body parts of with a bowie knife or when people were getting blasted in half by massive guns? I must have fallen asleep. Nothing in the film struck me as wild or exciting, and overall it's probably the only movie I genuinely regret paying to see because I feel like I just encouraged them to do this again |
|
|
|
Post by Non Banjoble Tokens on Nov 18, 2011 23:19:48 GMT -5
Kiddie safe action? Did you miss the various parts where Stallone was lopping people's body parts of with a bowie knife or when people were getting blasted in half by massive guns? I must have fallen asleep. Nothing in the film struck me as wild or exciting, and overall it's probably the only movie I genuinely regret paying to see because I feel like I just encouraged them to do this again Either you fell asleep or you were clinically dead for the duration of the movie.  |
|
|
|
Post by Michael Coello on Nov 18, 2011 23:27:23 GMT -5
I just hope the CGI is better in this. The one in the first was nearly laughable, and was only replaced as worst by The Losers having CG so bad, Roger Corman could have done better.
|
|
|
|
Post by DrBackflipsHoffman on Nov 18, 2011 23:30:31 GMT -5
I just hope the CGI is better in this. The one in the first was nearly laughable, and was only replaced as worst by The Losers having CG so bad, Roger Corman could have done better. It's not CGI - it's Stallones real face |
|
|
|
Post by Cela on Nov 18, 2011 23:45:11 GMT -5
I must have fallen asleep. Nothing in the film struck me as wild or exciting, and overall it's probably the only movie I genuinely regret paying to see because I feel like I just encouraged them to do this again Either you fell asleep or you were clinically dead for the duration of the movie. Terry Crews had a shotgun that distintegrated people! For kids! |
|
|
|
Post by DrBackflipsHoffman on Nov 18, 2011 23:47:06 GMT -5
I'll take back the kiddie action jibe. It still blew, though
|
|
Krazee
Salacious Crumb
Posts: 71,547 
|
Post by Krazee on Nov 18, 2011 23:48:25 GMT -5
the first one was so stupid why do we need a second one? need to make every man go through puberty again |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 19, 2011 0:26:39 GMT -5
Whether or not the film is any good, the poster is ridiculously awesome.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 19, 2011 0:41:04 GMT -5
This is the 80's allstar action movie the first should have been.
And now that it's finally happening..men everywhere have grown a 3rd testicle from the sheer manlieness of that poster.
The likes of crews and statham as much as I enjoy them need to take a backseat on this one ...let vandamme , norris etc rule this movie
|
|
|
|
Post by Koda, Master Crunchyroller on Nov 19, 2011 0:47:01 GMT -5
Either you fell asleep or you were clinically dead for the duration of the movie. Terry Crews had a shotgun that distintegrated people! For kids! Didn't he say something like the rounds he used in his shotgun were like mini-nukes or some awesome bullshit like that? Who cares, though? It turned people into piles of goo. |
|
Krimzon
Crow T. Robot
This guy is the man!
R.I.P. Deadpool
Posts: 43,870
|
Post by Krimzon on Nov 19, 2011 0:55:08 GMT -5
According to Bruce Willis, Steve Austin will be back, which is certainly interesting given the events of the first movie.
|
|
