|
Post by eJm on Nov 19, 2011 17:48:18 GMT -5
Loved the first one. This one looks somehow even manlier. Screw the haters; most of their complaints were that it was a stupid action film, which is about the worst missing of the point ever. Most of the complaints I saw was that it wasn't enough of a stupid action movie, actually. Too much time between blowing crap up. My main problem was that it should have been an 80s Action movie done in 2009 instead of a 2009 Made for DVD action movie that happened to star some big names. I mean, seriously, why did you give them a reason to take down that empire? Why not just f***ing go in there and blow stuff up?! Noone needed a reason in the 80s! Like Red Impact said, just blow stuff up and let us see it instead of having tonnes of modern shakey cam and CG blood.
|
|
|
Post by Bang Bang Bart on Nov 19, 2011 18:39:10 GMT -5
f*** Yeah!
|
|
|
Post by Sir Woodrow on Nov 19, 2011 18:51:47 GMT -5
I dug the original,though they should have added the ultimate in Hollywood testosterone-Woody Allen and Nathan Lane
|
|
|
Post by Lazy peon on Nov 19, 2011 18:53:25 GMT -5
f*** Yeah! WE'RE GONNA SAVE THE MOTHERf***ING DAY YEAH!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 20, 2011 13:45:02 GMT -5
I would mark so fn hard if they could get Eastwood to do this
|
|
|
Post by Sir Woodrow on Nov 20, 2011 17:01:06 GMT -5
I would mark so fn hard if they could get Eastwood to do this Hell yeah, as the man who first put the Expendables together
|
|
Push R Truth
Patti Mayonnaise
Unique and Special Snowflake, and a pants-less heathen.
Perpetually Constipated
Posts: 39,293
|
Post by Push R Truth on Nov 20, 2011 17:16:25 GMT -5
So... is Chuck Norris featured in this movie? Or is the movie featured in Chuck Norris?
|
|
|
Post by Viking Snad on Nov 20, 2011 17:38:46 GMT -5
So... is Chuck Norris featured in this movie? Or is the movie featured in Chuck Norris? Clearly this is a Chuck Norris biography movie.
|
|