Kane and Hell In A Cell

[thelonewolf527]

Inspired by a comment I saw on YouTube (yeah really) I had this idea. Now this is different from this guy's comment since he has Undertaker losing the match, but part of it was interesting to me.

What if during the Hell In A Cell match at WrestleMania, Kane comes out during the match and Tombstones Undertaker, paying homage to Bad Bloodd 15 years ago when Undertaker faced Shawn Michaels with Triple H essentially in his corner. Only this time, Undertaker kicks out of it and doesn't succumb to the Tombstone like he did 15 years ago. It may seem out of place, especially with Kane wrestling on the show as well, but I think it would at least be an interesting call back with continuity if this happens.

[01010010 01101001 01100011]

I'd hate it. Really between last year's match, HIAC and HBK as ref this match has more than enough going for it.

[Slanted and Enchanted]

I like it.

Adding on to the original post, if this is indeed an "End of An Era" match, I would pretty much love to see this signal the end of Hell in a Cell also. You have the two men most closely associate with the match finally going one on one with each other. You also have the original winner of the match being special ref.

In addition to seeing blood, I want to see somebody falling off the top of the cage, cameos by Kane and Foley, and I want JR calling the action. End this played out match gimmick in the most spectacular way possible if you are indeed closing out an era.

[Mochi Lone Wolf]

That would be such a pointless interference. The reason why the Tombstone at Bad Blood 1997 worked so well was because it fit into the story of the match. The Hell in the Cell was made so that Shawn Michaels(The cowardly heel) could not run away anymore from the badass face(The Undertaker) and the whole story of the match was that because Shawn couldn't run anymore, he was getting the hell beat out of him. Then, when it looked like Taker was finally going to put him away, Kane comes out and tombstones him. Allowing HBK to weasel his way out of trouble yet again. It made sense because it put over HBK as a cowardly heel and because Paul Bearer had been announcing that someone by the name of "Kane", who he claimed to be The Undertaker's brother, was coming back for revenge over what Taker allegedly did to their parents.

What you're asking here is for a guy who is not involved in THIS storyline in any way or even the story of the match come out, interfere, tombstone Taker again, and then have Taker just kick out. Rendering the entire deal pointless since, as mentioned above, he's not involved in the match's storyline and has a storyline of his own to fulfill that same night. Then again, it is Kane and we are dealing with a creative team who wouldn't know a decent story from their ass or a hole in the ground.

I can't blame you for this idea, you did say it came from a Youtube comment.

["American Dragon"]

I think there is a better chance of Vince McMahon interfering.

[thelonewolf527]

Mar 22, 2012 21:04:06 GMT -5 Mochi Lone Wolf said:

I can't blame you for this idea, you did say it came from a Youtube comment.

Inspired by, not got from. The comment I saw said Kane should Tombstone Undertaker and Undertaker loses because of it again and that WWE would be idiots for not doing that.

Clearly everyone can agree that that is a terrible idea. I'm not even sure if I like my own idea, but I do think it's at least an interesting discussion piece.

[keezy]

Kane is more than likely losing to Randy Orton in their little throwaway match so having him lose even more steam from Undertaker kicking out of his move will just damage Kane's reputation more.

[Turd Ferguson]

I'd love to see Kane interfere, but then have the announcers not know who he is.

[xCompackx]

I dunno, if they're going for another year long feud, it's not the worst idea ever.