Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 2, 2012 14:53:49 GMT -5
And there we go! Like clockwork. Don't address the discussion we were having, bring in all kinds of other noise. But hey, I'll bite.
Congratulations to Hulk Hogan, for figuring out that a guy in his late 50s who's had 12 back surgeries should not be wrestling regularly. Bravo, I applaud his incredibly sound judgment. Way to figure out what everyone's known for a decade, Hulk. Also, the way he begrudgingly accepts that you shouldn't put the belt on a guy who's f-ed up almost as many times as Scott Hall, and instead continue to develop a new main eventer? GENIUS.
The NO QUICK FIX thing though...didn't he go on and on about this awesome idea he has that is going to change everything? And if it doesn't work, he's just going to hightail it out the door?
|
|
|
Post by Michael Coello on May 2, 2012 15:02:04 GMT -5
And there we go! Like clockwork. Don't address the discussion we were having, bring in all kinds of other noise. But hey, I'll bite. Yeah, big talk about not sticking to the discussion at hand by a guy who can't even bother to correct me over something I said. You'd think you can focus on what I said (the whole point that the rating was 3 times as big during early 96 and 97) and point out that the numbers would fall short due to the RAW rating, at the lowest point, being around a 1.5, and Nitro would have not reached that point in the chart. You could have just said that and stopped this with me acknowledging I was wrong. You didn't need to go all "oh, you're changing the subject" or acting all offended I mention your other posts here, or whatever to prove that my argument is stupid without actually saying anything about it. Jesus.....
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 2, 2012 15:15:36 GMT -5
I honestly forgot about the post about all the buzz-phrases. But still, everything I posted was true. Hogan speaks in terms like that constantly, that has been the MO of the Hogan/Bischoff regime since day one. "Raising the bar' "taking things to the next level" etc. Just a bunch of empty phrases.
And, I did respond to what you said anyway, so I don't see what all this exasperation is about.
Also, you never acknowledged being wrong before.
Doneski.
|
|
Cronant
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Posts: 17,556
|
Post by Cronant on May 2, 2012 15:16:33 GMT -5
His big idea is encouraging fans to film wrestlers in their private time. This will go over swimmingly.
I LOVE the quote about him hightailing it. God thats funny.
|
|
|
Post by Brother Nero....Wolfe on May 2, 2012 15:18:11 GMT -5
Credit: Prowrestling.net Uh ... what? That was his big idea? Jesus, I hope that's not true. That sounds like the dumbest idea ever. I mean if you are not an attention whore, you probably like to have a moment of privacy or three. If I were a TNA wrestler, I'd hate that.
|
|
|
Post by 01010010 01101001 01100011 on May 2, 2012 15:21:31 GMT -5
Credit: Prowrestling.net Uh ... what? That was his big idea? As if the ladies didn't have enough problems before this, you wanted to actively encourage fans to stalk them?
|
|
|
Post by Michael Coello on May 2, 2012 15:27:04 GMT -5
And, I did respond to what you said anyway, so I don't see what all this exasperation is about. No, you didn't. You just said that you saw the numbers on two sites, but you never actually posted what the numbers are nor explained where. Same thing you called me out on. Now we're done(ski).
|
|
|
Post by norsisclouds on May 2, 2012 15:27:17 GMT -5
That sounds like a terrible idea. Good-bye privacy, stop trying to break the fourth wall! Everyone knows wrestling isn't real. Why not try to build new stars and a promotion in a traditional way, and stop trying to re-live in the NWO? It can't be done again!
|
|
dav
Hank Scorpio
Posts: 6,045
|
Post by dav on May 2, 2012 15:38:37 GMT -5
And, I did respond to what you said anyway, so I don't see what all this exasperation is about. No, you didn't. You just said that you saw the numbers on two sites, but you never actually posted what the numbers are nor explained where. Same thing you called me out on. Now we're done(ski). Actually, you've done that before when you said Jeff Hardy wasn't a harm on drawing figures but refused to back it up with figures. So I had to check up and posted the difference between a house show headlined by Jeff Hardy when he was Champion and one when AJ Styles when he was Champion and it showed that Hardy was a lot worse. So you do have a habit of making claims you can't, or won't, back up and then promptly changing the subject you're proven wrong.
|
|
|
Post by Michael Coello on May 2, 2012 15:41:48 GMT -5
No, you didn't. You just said that you saw the numbers on two sites, but you never actually posted what the numbers are nor explained where. Same thing you called me out on. Now we're done(ski). Actually, you've done that before when you said Jeff Hardy wasn't a harm on drawing figures but refused to back it up with figures. So I had to check up and posted the difference between a house show headlined by Jeff Hardy when he was Champion and one when AJ Styles when he was Champion and it showed that Hardy was a lot worse. So you do have a habit of making claims you can't, or won't, back up and then promptly changing the subject you're proven wrong. I didn't say I wasn't guilty of this. I am. I'm just pointing out the situation being the same.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 2, 2012 15:59:17 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Michael Coello on May 2, 2012 16:11:26 GMT -5
And the whole "Go ahead and find that info, I'll wait" line wasn't trying to start something?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 2, 2012 16:17:01 GMT -5
I just wanted you to try and back up your false claim. I had already looked myself. I figured you'd actually go look, see you were wrong, and say "whoops, I was wrong".
I over-estimated you.
|
|
|
Post by Michael Coello on May 2, 2012 16:20:17 GMT -5
I just wanted you to try and back up your false claim. I had already looked myself. I figured you'd actually go look, see you were wrong, and say "whoops, I was wrong". I over-estimated you. Cause by the time I saw the post and responded to it, there already was the graph posted, and I was using that instead, as not to make people jump for the book. And seriously cut the attitude.
|
|
|
Post by #Classic Hi-Definition X on May 2, 2012 17:28:52 GMT -5
Both of youse cut it out NOW.
|
|
|
Post by ________ has left the building on May 2, 2012 17:53:18 GMT -5
So the next great Hogan idea is to go stalkerazzi on TNA employees?
Yep, he's all out of ideas. Go ahead and send your resumes to John Laurinaitis.
|
|
|
Post by Dr. Bunsen Honeydew on May 3, 2012 14:20:53 GMT -5
Except it is, during the 96-97 years on the graph, as I mentioned. RAW ratings were around the 1 area, while Nitro above the 3. That looks like triple. Try again. The lowest Raw rating during that time was 1.5. Nitro was at 3. That's only double.
|
|
|
Post by Lance Uppercut on May 3, 2012 17:21:00 GMT -5
So the next great Hogan idea is to go stalkerazzi on TNA employees? Quick someone send this idea to CM Punk and Brock Lesner and get their thoughts on this.
|
|
|
Post by clashofchampains on May 3, 2012 18:39:35 GMT -5
Do not make your product better, just becomes paparazzis. bleh
|
|
|
Post by Jedi-El of Tomorrow on May 3, 2012 19:42:06 GMT -5
Credit: Prowrestling.net Uh ... what? That was his big idea? As if the ladies didn't have enough problems before this, you wanted to actively encourage fans to stalk them? Yeah, Mickie already had a fan that threatened to blow up WWE headquarters. Maryse, granted not in TNA, had her stalker. Having this is telling the people like that, "Film them when you see them. It might get used on television." If true I wonder how the roster would feel about it.
|
|