|
Post by Kevin Hamilton on Dec 10, 2011 14:06:52 GMT -5
Hell she's already done the nude Marilyn thing before for free.
Like five-ten years late on Playboy's part.
|
|
|
Post by knuckles on Dec 10, 2011 14:37:36 GMT -5
hey Playboy Dipsh*ts: WHY WOUL DI BUY YOUR RAG NOW, WHEN I HAVE ALREADY SEEN THE LACKLUSTER , UGLY, NO BUSH SHOTS ALREADY? WHAT WOULD BE THE POINT OF SPENDING MONEY ON THE ISSUE NOW???!!!
|
|
|
Post by Sir Woodrow on Dec 10, 2011 17:18:03 GMT -5
hey Playboy Dipsh*ts: WHY WOUL DI BUY YOUR RAG NOW, WHEN I HAVE ALREADY SEEN THE LACKLUSTER , UGLY, NO BUSH SHOTS ALREADY? WHAT WOULD BE THE POINT OF SPENDING MONEY ON THE ISSUE NOW???!!! For the articles, and the "hilarious" jokes and cartoons.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 10, 2011 17:21:43 GMT -5
Hell she's already done the nude Marilyn thing before for free. Like five-ten years late on Playboy's part.
|
|
|
Post by "Gizzark" Mike Wronglevenay on Dec 10, 2011 21:25:48 GMT -5
hey Playboy Dipsh*ts: WHY WOUL DI BUY YOUR RAG NOW, WHEN I HAVE ALREADY SEEN THE LACKLUSTER , UGLY, NO BUSH SHOTS ALREADY? WHAT WOULD BE THE POINT OF SPENDING MONEY ON THE ISSUE NOW???!!! Well, yes. I can kinda see why Playboy would be upset here. Regardless of whether people consider this to be a good decision on Playboy's part to even DO the shoot, their annoyance at it leaking (thus rendering the issue pointless) is perfectly reasonable.
|
|
El Hijo De Slapnuts
Samurai Cop
Really waiting for Minoru Suzuki to face off with a live gator.....
Posts: 2,256
|
Post by El Hijo De Slapnuts on Dec 10, 2011 22:33:26 GMT -5
Poor Playboy,people already saw that the shoot would be lackluster,now they make no money.
|
|
|
Post by Piccolo on Dec 10, 2011 22:37:56 GMT -5
Hell she's already done the nude Marilyn thing before for free. Like five-ten years late on Playboy's part. Not ten years, surely. The lady in question is 25.
|
|
|
Post by Kevin Hamilton on Dec 10, 2011 23:00:09 GMT -5
Hell she's already done the nude Marilyn thing before for free. Like five-ten years late on Playboy's part. Not ten years, surely. The lady in question is 25. Touche don't get Chris Hansen on me.. lol.
|
|
|
Post by paulbearer on Dec 11, 2011 2:05:12 GMT -5
Meh......why not Kelly Rutherford or Leighton Meester ? Believe me if Sophia Loren had done it back in the day youd be like "Lohan who ?"
|
|
Vampiro138
Hank Scorpio
the greatest vampire in the HISTORY of our sport
Posts: 5,755
|
Post by Vampiro138 on Dec 11, 2011 2:37:46 GMT -5
meh, the photos are more airbrushed than rvd's singlet...
|
|
|
Post by rapidfire187 on Dec 11, 2011 14:31:22 GMT -5
Playboy!? I figured she'd be doing Hustler at this point.
|
|
Celgress
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
The Superior One
Posts: 19,009
|
Post by Celgress on Dec 11, 2011 14:34:41 GMT -5
they're probably just shocked that apparently, $1 million doesn't buy what it used to. Indeed, I've seen the photos and, to put it mildly, Lohan nude is rather underwhelming.
|
|
|
Post by willywonka666 on Dec 11, 2011 14:40:04 GMT -5
I like them. Everything seems to go back to Marilyn nowadays-which isn't bad, but she's done it before. In this day and age, with free porn, a magazine with naked women in it isn't a big deal anymore-no matter who is in it.
|
|
ICBM
King Koopa
Didn't know we did status updates here now
Posts: 12,288
|
Post by ICBM on Dec 11, 2011 14:40:43 GMT -5
Internet d***bags strike again. I still like playboy despite all the free stuff online. It is a brand I support and trust. That said, they always make the celebrities look unrecognizable. Except for Brooke Burke and Sherri Belefonte, I don't remember them just letting somebody sell mags with what brought em to the dance.
|
|
Paco
Hank Scorpio
Posts: 7,145
|
Post by Paco on Dec 11, 2011 18:08:44 GMT -5
In this day and age, with free porn, a magazine with naked women in it isn't a big deal anymore-no matter who is in it. I slightly disagree. It has diminished Playboy's appeal a bit but any celeb nudity (even if just topless) will garner more attention than a random porn star spreading eagle and/or taking it from every which way. Nothing, um, "special" about the latter.
|
|
|
Post by willywonka666 on Dec 11, 2011 19:22:21 GMT -5
In this day and age, with free porn, a magazine with naked women in it isn't a big deal anymore-no matter who is in it. I slightly disagree. It has diminished Playboy's appeal a bit but any celeb nudity (even if just topless) will garner more attention than a random porn star spreading eagle and/or taking it from every which way. Nothing, um, "special" about the latter. Good point, but I don't think it will save Playboy at the end of it all
|
|
MCMGM
Vegeta
WC's Official Jeff Buckley Stalkeress.
Red Sonic My Ass
Posts: 9,184
|
Post by MCMGM on Dec 21, 2011 5:19:20 GMT -5
If she dies quick enough, in ten years' time people will try to pretend that she is, though. Hell, Anna Nicole Smith was treated like our generation's Marilyn Monroe with over a month of extensive TV news coverage after her death. And she wasn't even half as famous as Lindsay Lohan. So yeah, Lindsay would more than likely be idolized as "our" Marilyn if/when she passes away. Um. Anna was very well known before her drug problems?
|
|
|
Post by Cela on Dec 21, 2011 5:23:23 GMT -5
Hell, Anna Nicole Smith was treated like our generation's Marilyn Monroe with over a month of extensive TV news coverage after her death. And she wasn't even half as famous as Lindsay Lohan. So yeah, Lindsay would more than likely be idolized as "our" Marilyn if/when she passes away. Um. Anna was very well know before her drug problems? Yeah, she was known for some acting, some modeling, but mostly marrying a really old guy for money.
|
|
|
Post by Evilution E5150 on Dec 21, 2011 6:00:46 GMT -5
thread should really be called "Playboy upset because internet made it no longer relevant"
|
|
|
Post by willywonka666 on Dec 21, 2011 8:20:51 GMT -5
|
|