Post by Stu on Nov 26, 2005 1:04:55 GMT -5
I know there are already plenty of Royal Rumble threads up (more than three months early too), but I just wanted to point this out.
There have been several posts over the years that number 30 in the Royal Rumble never wins (and 27 usually does). And I believe someone in this forum said today that he wished there would be a time in which whomever is granted the number 30 spot would mention that he hoped to be the first 30th entrant to win, or at least make reference to the fact that the spot is totally worthless.
If you watch the 1994 Royal Rumble, Adam Bomb was the 30th entrant and only lasted a couple minutes or so. Just then, the great Ted Dibiase (not being sarcastic) totally goes off on Bomb for being eliminated so early and says "There's no excuse."
If only he would come back this year and point that out again.
There have been several posts over the years that number 30 in the Royal Rumble never wins (and 27 usually does). And I believe someone in this forum said today that he wished there would be a time in which whomever is granted the number 30 spot would mention that he hoped to be the first 30th entrant to win, or at least make reference to the fact that the spot is totally worthless.
If you watch the 1994 Royal Rumble, Adam Bomb was the 30th entrant and only lasted a couple minutes or so. Just then, the great Ted Dibiase (not being sarcastic) totally goes off on Bomb for being eliminated so early and says "There's no excuse."
If only he would come back this year and point that out again.