Sparkybob
King Koopa
I have a status?
Posts: 10,990
|
Post by Sparkybob on Jan 23, 2013 12:08:26 GMT -5
I just spoiler it to be safe. {Spoiler} {Spoiler}If they bring back money in the bank for Mania, I don't see why Ryback needs to win it, since he has enough credibility to get title shots when ever he wants. Then again who ever wins the contract has to cash it in before the money in the bank PPV so we don't get a situation with 3 briefcases floating around. Thought at least the money in the bank match will get the mid card on the WM card so that's good I guess.
|
|
|
Post by froggyfrog on Jan 23, 2013 12:16:09 GMT -5
I hope MITB stays its own PPV. Even if it doesn't I wouldn't have Ryback be in a MITB match. You don't want him winning his first title on a cheap cash in like so many others, you want him to demolish a heel champ on an even playing field.
|
|
JCBaggee
Hank Scorpio
Writer, streamer. I used to write for CBR but then they fired everyone who cared about their writers
Posts: 6,787
|
Post by JCBaggee on Jan 23, 2013 12:20:26 GMT -5
Yes to a Money in the Bank match on the WrestleMania card, no to Ryback being in it. Ryback's already in the main event contendership, there's an entire midcard to benefit from that push.
|
|
|
Post by The Baltimore Staircase on Jan 23, 2013 12:24:46 GMT -5
I really think Ryback can hold off on a title until he destroys Mark Henry to become World Heavyweight Champ.
Yeah, that's what I want to happen anyway. Mark Henry to return and destroy everyone. Who can stop him? Ryback, that's who. Instant monster face.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 23, 2013 12:34:44 GMT -5
Honestly, I don't like this.
I'd prefer Ryback vs Big Show for the world title (provided Show gets it back before Mania)
|
|
543Y2J
Patti Mayonnaise
Seventh level .gif Master
Posts: 38,794
|
Post by 543Y2J on Jan 23, 2013 12:45:49 GMT -5
I miss plunder and weapon matches at WM, its something different on the card and is able to make the card as a whole more rounded. I think these past few Mania's without some sort of weapon/hardcore match in the undercard really suffered. X7 is viewed as one of the greatest wrestling events of all time, because I feel it had a well rounded card with technical matches, a mcmahon drama match, a tlc match, a nodq wwe championship match and a gimmick over the top battle royal. On the other hand 10 years later at WM27 it only had ONE gimmick match which was the NODQ match for the WWE Championship, between Cena and Miz.
Point being is I think WM is better with more gimmicks, although I am happy either way with MITB being on PPV or on WM. Either way I am happy, but what I would do is make a variation of the MITB match at WM and still keep the MITB PPV. Make it a TLC match version at WM, and have the normal Ladder match version for the PPV.
I also agree with JC Ryback is above it now and doesn't need MITB. He is already made and a legit threat to one of the championships.
|
|
|
Post by xxshoyuweeniexx on Jan 23, 2013 12:47:46 GMT -5
At least if there's a 3rd Money in the Bank, it'll be way more unpredictable since A) Rock beats Punk, Cena beats Rock at Mania, so that year long regin will be over and done so there's a chance for a shake up, and B), It'll be dual branded, so we'd have no idea which Championship there going for, not like Ziggler who's briefcase is only good for a "World" (AKA we need this for house shows to fool people into thinking Smackdown is worth spending money on) Championship.
|
|
The Possum
Unicron
JBL stands for "Just Beat a Lizard".
Posts: 3,013
|
Post by The Possum on Jan 23, 2013 20:33:09 GMT -5
I still think this is the year for Ryback vs. Cena, but we all know WWE wants their precious rematch.
|
|
|
Post by A Platypus Rave on Jan 23, 2013 20:34:57 GMT -5
Honestly, I don't like this. I'd prefer Ryback vs Big Show for the world title (provided Show gets it back before Mania) Honestly before ADR won it randomly I was fully expecting Ryback to win the rumble and challenge Show for it.
|
|
|
Post by EoE: Well There's Your Problem on Jan 24, 2013 1:23:48 GMT -5
Yes to a Money in the Bank match on the WrestleMania card, no to Ryback being in it. Ryback's already in the main event contendership, there's an entire midcard to benefit from that push.
|
|
|
Post by Sponsored by Groose Wipes on Jan 24, 2013 2:10:11 GMT -5
I don't want a MITB match at mania seeing how there's a PPV for that.
|
|
|
Post by CATCH_US IS the Conversation on Jan 24, 2013 2:13:24 GMT -5
I don't want Ryback going after the World Heavyweight Championship. At this point it would be a step down to move him back to the B brand and give him the charity title.
|
|
|
Post by memphis25 on Jan 24, 2013 2:55:02 GMT -5
I hope they don't have a MITB match at WM since it will devalue the PPV itself which is over as a show but I know they want to have a big several man match on the show to get guys payoffs. They should do something like a gauntlet match or even a one night only MITB style match where the winner gets a shot at the IC or US title later in the show, but save the MITB for its own show to keep it special.
If they 100% know Ryback can get Show up in his move then they need to just do that match and give Ryback a big WrestleMania moment which can lead into a title match later to jump start his momentum back after coming up short over the last 4 months or so causing him to lose some steam.
SummerSlam with Brock with Paul vs a face Punk and Cena vs Ryback for the title could be a great start to a money show.
|
|
|
Post by Urfarkendarf on Jan 24, 2013 3:10:20 GMT -5
Id much rather see MITB as a Mania event than its own PPV.
I still think two briefcases is complete overkill. I get that the PPV has been good the last few years, but Ive felt from the beginning that match should stay on Mania. I'd rather see the MITB PPV fashioned to something else.
Or what I think could be feasible, is have say the WWE Title MITB at Mania, and the WHC MITB at the MITB PPV and just alternate that every year.
I also agree that Ryback doesn't "need" it, but I also can see a POV where they keep him away from an actual reign for a bit longer so it potentially means more when he finally does win it.
|
|