|
|
Post by bestthateverdidit on Apr 5, 2013 20:29:58 GMT -5
Is it time for HHH to have one last run?
I don't see the point of the Brock/HHH stipulation if HHH is going to win but at the same time I don't see HHH losing to Brock twice in a row. So what is going to happen? If HHH wins, is he getting a last run?
Will he challenge Cena for the belt?
|
|
Sparkybob
King Koopa
I have a status?
Posts: 10,990 
|
Post by Sparkybob on Apr 5, 2013 20:35:29 GMT -5
Hunter is going to win, disappear into summerslam so he can come back and have another main event match.
|
|
Totorob101
Hank Scorpio
Glob Glob Glob
Posts: 5,591
|
Post by Totorob101 on Apr 5, 2013 20:35:36 GMT -5
No, lets hope this doesnt happen.
|
|
|
|
Post by CATCH_US IS the Conversation on Apr 5, 2013 20:37:28 GMT -5
One last run as in wrestling again. Maybe
One last run as in a final title reign. No.
Actually what I'd like to see is Triple H establishing himself as an on-screen authority figure, and make himself the new Da Undatakah. Like if a heel gets a bit too cocky, or attacks a random face, HHH punishes them by booking them in a match against himself. HHH would either lose by heavy shenanigans or win after letting the wrestler get a decent amount of offense and making them look good (yes, it's hard to type this with a straight face).
|
|
|
|
Post by Hit Girl on Apr 5, 2013 21:45:06 GMT -5
No
Let it end on Sunday
|
|
Juice
El Dandy
Wrong? Oh he can tell ya about being wrong.
I'm the one who raised you from perdition.
Posts: 8,172
|
Post by Juice on Apr 5, 2013 22:48:50 GMT -5
I don't think HHH can be an authority figure because everyone would expect him to book himself into a match, and the guy does have a following. Who would all be disappointed that he didn't. It could de rail things.
But no, no last run, and I hope this is his last match.
|
|
|
|
Post by Andy Martin on Apr 5, 2013 22:51:54 GMT -5
Absolutely no need for that to happen.
|
|
|
|
Post by celticjobber on Apr 5, 2013 23:21:00 GMT -5
I'm hoping Brock goes over, and Trips "retires".
|
|
|
|
Post by thelonewolf527 on Apr 5, 2013 23:24:56 GMT -5
Triple H should win because that's logical story telling and if he doesn't, it means that Lesnar got to destroy Vince McMahon and manhandle Triple H about 3 times and get away with it. From a storyline perspective ignoring the intangibles, Triple H should win.
|
|
zeez
Patti Mayonnaise
Yeah. That's right.
Posts: 32,702
|
Post by zeez on Apr 5, 2013 23:27:34 GMT -5
If Triple H wrestles again after Sunday, it'll only be for special occasions where it makes sense within the boundaries of whatever story is being told. I think his standing in the company has allowed his ego to finally step aside from being the main event.
|
|
|
|
Post by Unaffiliated on Apr 5, 2013 23:28:12 GMT -5
Absolutely not. It is time for Triple H to just go away. If he is to stay, just put him in the McMahon authority figure role.
|
|
|
|
Post by Citizen Grimm on Apr 5, 2013 23:31:39 GMT -5
Triple H should win because that's logical story telling and if he doesn't, it means that Lesnar got to destroy Vince McMahon and manhandle Triple H about 3 times and get away with it. From a storyline perspective ignoring the intangibles, Triple H should win. But if you let Lesnar go over it can be used as an example that HHH is over the hill and needs to retire. Then Hunyet could find a younger guy, say Sheamus for an example, to take out Brock for him. |
|
Juice
El Dandy
Wrong? Oh he can tell ya about being wrong.
I'm the one who raised you from perdition.
Posts: 8,172
|
Post by Juice on Apr 5, 2013 23:57:48 GMT -5
As much as i want Lesnar to win, I just don't see it happening. I know the argument has been made that because he is a part timer he shouldn't be losing two of his three big matches, however if he is gone until Summerslam they can just have him show up and destroy again, as if he never got beaten at mania.
|
|
|
|
Post by CourtesyFlush on Apr 6, 2013 4:16:33 GMT -5
Nope. You can tell that HHH doesn't have "IT" anymore. Whatever "IT" is, HHH lost it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Wolf Hawkfield no1 NZ poster on Apr 6, 2013 4:35:05 GMT -5
No.
If he can lose to The Undertaker twice in a row surely he can do the same with Brock.
I would much rather have someone else get the rub from beating Lesnar and HHH would nowdays be better suited for an authority figure role.
|
|
|
|
Post by "Gizzark" Mike Wronglevenay on Apr 6, 2013 5:26:22 GMT -5
The Rock losing the WWE title to Triple H in 2013 would be f***ing hilarious.
At the same time it'd also be kinda fresh. When did he last have it, 2009?
|
|
welshjobber
Trap-Jaw
How do you like me now?
Posts: 474
|
Post by welshjobber on Apr 6, 2013 7:52:30 GMT -5
Triple H still goes well and heck, is probably still better than half the guys on the roster. Be stupid to limit yourself when he can still provide something, he's not exactly in the Ric Flair mould of hanging on beyond his expiry date.
I'd love a Ziggler-HHH feud
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 6, 2013 7:55:19 GMT -5
Noahhh. It's time to end the gameahhh.
|
|
CM Dazz
King Koopa
Chuck
Posts: 10,475
|
Post by CM Dazz on Apr 6, 2013 8:23:22 GMT -5
Triple H should win because that's logical story telling and if he doesn't, it means that Lesnar got to destroy Vince McMahon and manhandle Triple H about 3 times and get away with it. From a storyline perspective ignoring the intangibles, Triple H should win. As the story go's you're right, HHH should win. However I'm only 50-50 on whether or not he actually does. Who else thinks he looks much more intimidating now with short hair than when he did with long hair? |
|
OzzyMandez
Mephisto
Layla's Legion Representin'
Posts: 671
|
Post by OzzyMandez on Apr 6, 2013 9:16:38 GMT -5
It's never time for one last run with Hunter.
|
|
