All 62 Mania Streaks (UPDATED!)

[WBL a.k.a. Mountie II]

So recently, in a discussion about The Streak, I was curious... sure, Taker had "THE STREAK", but who else had a Mania streak? Surely couldn't be more than a handful of people, right? So thanks to some research I did in a couple links provided by fellow FAN forumer Reflecto, I got my hands on a lost of win-loss records from all 29 Manias, and looked for everyone who's undefeated.

UPDATED FOR EASIER TO READ FORMAT. ALSO, I FORGOT CHYNA.

<21 Win>
Undertaker

<4 Win>
Rob Van Dam

<3 Win>
Animal
Ax
Hawk
Miz
Sable

<2 Win>
Chyna
Mr. T
Rick Rude (and one draw)
Shane McMahon
Tatanka
Terry Funk
Virgil

<1 Win>
Akebono
Alundra Blayze
Arn Anderson
Bad News Brown (and two draws)
Bill Goldberg
Boogey Man
Butterbean
Chuck Palumbo
Cpl. Kirchner
Dallas Page
David Otunga
Dean Ambrose
Dory Funk
Dusty Rhodes
Fabulous Moolah
Fandango
Floyd Mayweather Jr.
Genichiro Tenryu
Haiti Kid
Kerry Von Erich
Kij Kaito
Lawrence Taylor
Little Beaver
Marc Mero
Maria Menounos
Michael Cole
Mo
Rick Steiner
Roman Reigns
Sabu
Sato
Sandman
Sapphire
Scott Steiner
Seth Rollins
Snooki
Tama
Tanaka
Terri Runnels
Terry Taylor
Tom Zenk
Tommy Dreamer
Tully Blanchard
Vader (with one draw)
Vickie Guerrero
Wendi Richter

<0 Win> (No wins, no losses, just ONE draw, so technically they're both streak and anti-streak)
Billy Jack Haynes
David Sammartino

62 STREAKS.

However, if you end up listing only people who have won three matches or more...

Animal 3-0
Ax 3-0
Hawk 3-0
The Miz 3-0
Rob Van Dam 4-0
Sable 3-0
Undertaker 21-0

So The Road Warriors, Demolition Ax, The Miz and Sable all have three wins. But if Taker were to lose at WM30, The Streak now belongs to Rob Van Dam. And it's not an almost-streak, it's not a streak-minus-one, if Taker loses at WM30. It's either a streak or not a streak.

So that's one of the reasons, I feel, that Undertaker is not gonna lose the streak at WM30, same reason as one of the reasons it wasn't broken by Punk at WM29. Because if Taker's "The Streak" is broken, it's gone and dead. And the official "The Streak" NOW belongs to Rob Van Dam... who is currently under contract with a different company.

So if Taker even shows up at WM30, he'll tack on another victory. But what I think the WWE is going to do is, give Miz another victory, however meaningless and tainted it might be, at Mania, so that his record is 4-0. Tying RVD's streak. Then, because Miz is yet another star we can't stand that gets shoved down our throat again and again and again and just won't GO AWAY, at Wrestlemania 31, they're gonna have Miz break the streak. So he'll be the new Streak, at 5-0. And we'll have to put up with two more decades of his crap.

At least, that's what I think the WWE is going to do.

What I would do, is I would bring back Road Warrior Animal and Demoltion Ax, since Hawk has passed away, bring them back and do a Gangstanators type of gimmick.

Road Demolition.

The Legion of Demolition.

Demo-Legion.

Oooooh. I like that one.

[Deleted]

Sorry Dude but Michael Mcgillicutty has more chance of ending the streak than The Miz

[WBL a.k.a. Mountie II]

May 3, 2013 9:32:07 GMT -5 @graant said:

Sorry Dude but Michael Mcgillicutty has more chance of ending the streak than The Miz

I know the idea of The Miz ending The Streak is incredibly stupid.

Which is why the WWE is probably going to do it.

[Deleted]

But seriously, no. Taker's streak will never be broken. Especially at an insignificant WrestleMania by an insignificant wrestler (sorry Miz).

[Deleted]

The thing is though RVD's "streak" doesn't matter.


It would only ever matter if WWE brought it up, which they haven't and won't

[xxshoyuweeniexx]

I think WWE's realized how Miz is nowhere near good enough in ring to be a main eventer, but they're gonna keep him in the upper midcard because he's really good at press. So no, I don't think WWE, Triple H, or anyone is dumb enough to let Miz break the streak when they're content with where he is now.

[hargh]

[zeez]

Even if The Streak is ended, I really don't think the WWE is gonna just start again with somebody else (at least not immediately). It's not like they planned initially for The Streak to even be a thing. It just happened. What Undertaker has attained can't be manufactured (well, not for the first 10-15 years of it) and unless WWE has the ability to see 20 years into the future to know if The Miz will become a legend in the same vein as The Phenom, it'd be pointless and potentially disastrous to just start The Streak over like that. They can continue to let Miz win at Wrestlemania if they want but don't make a big deal out of a streak unless it makes sense to do so.

Also, I don't want to see The Streak ended. It's Undertaker's thing. Let him retire with it.

[keepinitreal365]

If the Miz ended the UnderTaker's WrestleMania streak i honest to god believe there would be a full on riot.

[kidglov3s]

I figure when they shift the streak to Miz, which is what I believe they will do, they'll include his pre-show victories in the tally so he'll be like 6-0 after he wins last year. Preserving this streak is probably why they had him beat Barrett but then drop it right back to him the next night.

[keepinitreal365]

Ricardo Rodriguez has a better chance of ending Taker's streak. Seriously if it wasn't broken by kane or Orton and IF john cena doesn't end it then it should never be broken. As someone else said let him retire with it. UnderTaker in some ways is already overshadowed by Rock and Austin as the greatest superstar. Mainly because of rock and Austin going Hollywood. Let taker have his streak. I hope no one ever reaches it.

[Deleted]

I'd like if The Miz got a streak like the Undertaker's except instead of long, hard-fought battles with finishers and near-counts aplenty they are all filled with shenanigans and fluke wins, except he plays the victories up like they were all-time classics.

[keepinitreal365]

May 3, 2013 10:15:38 GMT -5 @thickmcrunfast said:

I'd like if The Miz got a streak like the Undertaker's except instead of long, hard-fought battles with finishers and near-counts aplenty they are all filled with shenanigans and fluke wins, except he plays the victories up like they were all-time classics.

And proclaim how his streak is better than undertaker's. Oh yes instant douche bag heat. I love it.

[TheDieselTrain]

May 3, 2013 9:54:43 GMT -5 kidglov3s said:

I figure when they shift the streak to Miz, which is what I believe they will do, they'll include his pre-show victories in the tally so he'll be like 6-0 after he wins last year. Preserving this streak is probably why they had him beat Barrett but then drop it right back to him the next night.

If so then he has no streak. He lost at the WM25 pre-show.

[WBL a.k.a. Mountie II]

May 3, 2013 10:33:22 GMT -5 TheDieselTrain said:

May 3, 2013 9:54:43 GMT -5 kidglov3s said:

I figure when they shift the streak to Miz, which is what I believe they will do, they'll include his pre-show victories in the tally so he'll be like 6-0 after he wins last year. Preserving this streak is probably why they had him beat Barrett but then drop it right back to him the next night.

If so then he has no streak. He lost at the WM25 pre-show.

Yeah. Pre-shows aren't counted. They're not part of the actual show.

[kidglov3s]

Either way I still think they're gonna run with The Miz's streak. He's pretty much the best choice because of how much they love him.

[dicecasden]

The Miz ending the streak is not nearly as stupid as people claiming for someone like CM Punk to end it, he is solid enough in the ring and is by all accounts one of the few guys who could get a lot of mileage out of it. Hell, if Jericho could get 10 years worth of credibility out of beating a drunk and an actor on the same night, then Miz would be set for life

[Savage Gambino]

The Game didn't end the streak in three tries. Shawn didn't end it in two tries. Kane didn't end the streak. Randy Orton, Edge, CM Punk, none of them ended the streak.

But, yeah, they're just gonna give the streak to a guy who can barely get on television after the third quarter.

[bob]

Sable vs Taker at WM XXX

streak vs streak

[Brother Nero....Wolfe]

May 3, 2013 10:33:22 GMT -5 TheDieselTrain said:

May 3, 2013 9:54:43 GMT -5 kidglov3s said:

I figure when they shift the streak to Miz, which is what I believe they will do, they'll include his pre-show victories in the tally so he'll be like 6-0 after he wins last year. Preserving this streak is probably why they had him beat Barrett but then drop it right back to him the next night.

If so then he has no streak. He lost at the WM25 pre-show.

I think they'll try to draw a distinction between dark matches and youtube'd pre-shows or...something.