mrjl
Fry's dog Seymour
Posts: 20,319 
|
Post by mrjl on Jun 30, 2013 6:32:11 GMT -5
Hold a special battle royal, with all the lower carders and divas and make it for a briefcase that can challenge for any belt(except the divas for the guys)
|
|
|
|
Post by AnActualBear on Jun 30, 2013 6:51:25 GMT -5
That would water down the concept even more. Having 2 briefcases is bad enough without having 3 of the bloody things.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 30, 2013 6:58:26 GMT -5
I still stand by my idea a couple of years ago that the winner should be able to cash in to end Taker's streak at WM if they wanted.
|
|
|
|
Post by snopes on Jun 30, 2013 8:56:43 GMT -5
Worst idea I have.heard in a long time.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 30, 2013 10:57:29 GMT -5
f*** it, give everyone a briefcase!
|
|
|
|
Post by CATCH_US IS the Conversation on Jun 30, 2013 10:59:48 GMT -5
I still stand by my idea a couple of years ago that the winner should be able to cash in to end Taker's streak at WM if they wanted. Idk. Sure the Streak may be a bigger accomplishment than any title, but imo that should never be said out loud by anyone |
|
CMWaters
Ozymandius
Rolled a Seven, Beat the Ads.
Bald and busy
Posts: 63,089
|
Post by CMWaters on Jun 30, 2013 11:01:07 GMT -5
If they were better pushing the Divas division, a Divas Money in the Bank could have been interesting.
*Pictures a pink briefcase...
|
|
Yami Daimao
Patti Mayonnaise
Really, really wants to zigazig ah!
Posts: 31,784
|
Post by Yami Daimao on Jun 30, 2013 11:03:06 GMT -5
I still stand by my idea a couple of years ago that the winner should be able to cash in to end Taker's streak at WM if they wanted. Why do that when all someone has to do is call out Taker during WM season? Instant WM match. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 30, 2013 11:30:39 GMT -5
Hell they should do it the way TNA or late WCW would do it and have 5 different briefcases hung above the ring during a single MITB match, one with a WWE title shot, one with a IC or US title shot and then 2 with tag team title shots (both holders of this one must compete together for the title, and both of them have to agree when to cash it in) and 1 where the worker gets fired. no one knows which briecase is which, once you capture a breifcase you must leave the match so each competitor can only win 1 briefcase, the briefcases will be opened the next night on Raw, before opening it to see what is inside you can swap with any other winner if you wish (for no reason at all)
|
|
|
|
Post by DASH 243✅ on Jun 30, 2013 12:05:58 GMT -5
I would love to see a tag team money in the bank match. Have like 5 or 6 tag teams in the match
|
|
Hawk Hart
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Sold his organs.
The Best There Is, the Best There Was, and the Best That There Ever Will Be
Posts: 15,296
|
Post by Hawk Hart on Jun 30, 2013 12:16:38 GMT -5
I still stand by my idea a couple of years ago that the winner should be able to cash in to end Taker's streak at WM if they wanted. God yes. I actually had the idea to have Lesnar win one of the cases last year and then cash in on the Undertaker's Streak. |
|
|
|
Post by Kev The Omniscient on Jun 30, 2013 13:09:40 GMT -5
I still stand by my idea a couple of years ago that the winner should be able to cash in to end Taker's streak at WM if they wanted. Idk. Sure the Streak may be a bigger accomplishment than any title, but imo that should never be said out loud by anyone I believe Punk said exactly that in his Post-WM 29 going away promo. |
|
|
|
Post by Manute Bol on Jun 30, 2013 13:54:27 GMT -5
Terrible idea. There should be one briefcase fought for in a single match at WrestleMania for a shot at the winner's choice of either the WWE or World Championship. Having two people run around with briefcases is silly and redundant; to add a third or even a diva is just ridiculous. Why not just replace Championships with briefcases?
|
|
|
|
Post by Unaffiliated on Jun 30, 2013 14:28:43 GMT -5
If there's one thing that should be changed about MITB, it should be either
a) Done away with altogether, or
b) Have cash-ins regulated to prevent cheap title wins
|
|
|
|
Post by "Cane Dewey" Johnson on Jun 30, 2013 14:34:48 GMT -5
That being said, having more than one briefcase seems silly to some people because having more than one world title is just as silly.
|
|
|
|
Post by wallabylikeyou on Jun 30, 2013 15:10:46 GMT -5
Give everyone on the roster a briefcase. Only they know which title it's for. Some for the World Title, some for the Diva's title, some for the COO position, some mean if you pin the other guy he gets fired. Watch the chaos ensue.
|
|
Chip
Hank Scorpio
Slam Jam Death.
Posts: 5,185
|
Post by Chip on Jun 30, 2013 15:48:26 GMT -5
I still stand by my idea a couple of years ago that the winner should be able to cash in to end Taker's streak at WM if they wanted. Why do that when all someone has to do is call out Taker during WM season? Instant WM match. Same applies to any WWE title every day of the year. |
|
theryno665
Grimlock
wants a title underneath the stars
Kinda Homeless
Posts: 13,571
|
Post by theryno665 on Jun 30, 2013 15:52:50 GMT -5
f*** it, give everyone a briefcase! Everyone else gets "Participation" briefcases. |
|
Lila
El Dandy
Slip N Slide World Champion 1997
Posts: 8,905 
|
Post by Lila on Jun 30, 2013 16:07:24 GMT -5
f*** it, give everyone a briefcase!  "You get a briefcase! And you get a briefcase!" |
|
|
|
Post by Vice honcho room temperature on Jun 30, 2013 16:38:43 GMT -5
How about we make a briefcase that you can challenge for the Money in the Bank briefcase. So you got to cash it in before MR. MITB cashes it in or its worthless
|
|
