If Trips had unified the titles in 2001 instead of Jericho-

[Starshine]

Do you think they would have bothered to reference it as happening once before during the lead up and at the PPV itself?

[Sparkybob]

Pretty sure they made a reference to it but said it was different because Jericho unified the WCW and WWE belt.

[Lila]

It would be mention every 5 secs if that happen, but since it's Jericho and HHH has always had this grind or jealously against him, less mentioning.

[Starshine]

Dec 16, 2013 0:44:59 GMT -5 Sparkybob said:

Pretty sure they made a reference to it but said it was different because Jericho unified the WCW and WWE belt.

Okay fair enough.

Would it have been mentioned MOAR?

[EoE: Well There's Your Problem]

I just chalk it down to the commentators being idiots as opposed to some intentional malicious attempt to marginalise Jericho's career.

[kidglov3s]

Dec 16, 2013 0:45:16 GMT -5 Lila said:

It would be mention every 5 secs if that happen, but since it's Jericho and HHH has always had this grind or jealously against him, less mentioning.

HHH may have the grind, but I'm not ready for the grind.

OK, I'm ready for the grind.

[Mayonnaise]

Dec 16, 2013 0:45:54 GMT -5 Starshine said:

Dec 16, 2013 0:44:59 GMT -5 Sparkybob said:

Pretty sure they made a reference to it but said it was different because Jericho unified the WCW and WWE belt.

Okay fair enough.

Would it have been mentioned MOAR?

I don't think so simply because it would have taken away from what they wanted this match to mean. Look at all the hype in this being the most important match in history, the combining of the two oldest titles in existence and having to say that it happened just a decade earlier, Trips or not I don't think they'd have done that.

[Todd Pettengill]

Aside from a few weeks during the Backlund/Valentine feud... When was this Disputed?