|
|
Post by king1836 on Jan 25, 2014 17:27:54 GMT -5
I say 2008.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 25, 2014 17:55:44 GMT -5
Nah WWE has been good to great since 2012 and TNA was good from 2008 to 2009 and was awesome during BOBBY ROOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOS reign and the first month of Aries reign
|
|
|
|
Post by king1836 on Jan 25, 2014 18:01:19 GMT -5
Nah WWE has been good to great since 2012 and TNA was good from 2008 to 2009 and was awesome during BOBBY ROOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOS reign and the first month of Aries reign I am curious about something : What was so great about WWE in 2013? |
|
AdamAFL was sooooo wrong
Hank Scorpio
note to all: he's a pants-less heathen
I Survived The Impact Spoilers 7/22/15-7/30/15
Posts: 7,097 
|
Post by AdamAFL was sooooo wrong on Jan 25, 2014 18:07:14 GMT -5
How good was WWE in 2012? I really can't remember what happened that year which is weird and disturbing but that was the last good year TNA had. They had a solid start to year up until the build-up to Lockdown, which was great, then Lockdown as a show kind of sucked but the next few months (starting with the build-up to Sacrifice which was fun, and ending with Hardcore Justice because after that the shows took a bit of a nosedive quality wise). The rest of the year wasn't as good but it was far from awful. So that was TNA's last good year, if WWE were good that year then there's my answer.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 25, 2014 18:13:30 GMT -5
Nah WWE has been good to great since 2012 and TNA was good from 2008 to 2009 and was awesome during BOBBY ROOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOS reign and the first month of Aries reign I am curious about something : What was so great about WWE in 2013? Hmm lets see they had Lesnar vs. Punk A lot of great Shield matches Goldusts return along with his match with Orton and his tag team with Cody The rise of Daniel Bryan And pretty much the best roster since the 2001 |
|
Juice
El Dandy
Wrong? Oh he can tell ya about being wrong.
I'm the one who raised you from perdition.
Posts: 8,172
|
Post by Juice on Jan 25, 2014 18:39:24 GMT -5
This best years were before spike and ended after joes first defeat. They were An alternative. Wwe was f***ing terrible from 07 to 09 if not for edge punk and ECW I would have quit all together.
|
|
|
|
Post by "Gizzark" Mike Wronglevenay on Jan 25, 2014 18:41:38 GMT -5
I am curious about something : What was so great about WWE in 2013? Hmm lets see they had Lesnar vs. Punk A lot of great Shield matches Goldusts return along with his match with Orton and his tag team with Cody The rise of Daniel Bryan And pretty much the best roster since the 2001 The Shield debuted in late 2012 and didn't have any matches until 2013. Goldust didn't come back until 2013. Daniel Bryan didn't rise until 2013. And the year originally cited was 2012, because TNA sucked in 2013. WWE in 2012 did have Lesnar/Punk, though, so you're uh... you're right about that one. |
|
Hawk Hart
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Sold his organs.
The Best There Is, the Best There Was, and the Best That There Ever Will Be
Posts: 15,296
|
Post by Hawk Hart on Jan 25, 2014 18:43:48 GMT -5
Hmm lets see they had Lesnar vs. Punk A lot of great Shield matches Goldusts return along with his match with Orton and his tag team with Cody The rise of Daniel Bryan And pretty much the best roster since the 2001 The Shield debuted in late 2012 and didn't have any matches until 2013. Goldust didn't come back until 2013. Daniel Bryan didn't rise until 2013. And the year originally cited was 2012, because TNA sucked in 2013. WWE in 2012 did have Lesnar/Punk, though, so you're uh... you're right about that one.  Hmm? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 25, 2014 18:49:37 GMT -5
Hmm lets see they had Lesnar vs. Punk A lot of great Shield matches Goldusts return along with his match with Orton and his tag team with Cody The rise of Daniel Bryan And pretty much the best roster since the 2001 The Shield debuted in late 2012 and didn't have any matches until 2013. Goldust didn't come back until 2013. Daniel Bryan didn't rise until 2013. And the year originally cited was 2012, because TNA sucked in 2013. WWE in 2012 did have Lesnar/Punk, though, so you're uh... you're right about that one. First he asked what happened in 2013 seconed i never the shield debuted in 2013 but they did have a ton of great matches so you uh..... missed just about the entire point of my post |
|
|
|
Post by "Gizzark" Mike Wronglevenay on Jan 25, 2014 18:49:52 GMT -5
The Shield debuted in late 2012 and didn't have any matches until 2013. Goldust didn't come back until 2013. Daniel Bryan didn't rise until 2013. And the year originally cited was 2012, because TNA sucked in 2013. WWE in 2012 did have Lesnar/Punk, though, so you're uh... you're right about that one. Hmm? Okay, so they had one match... rest of what I said's still correct, though! |
|
|
|
Post by KobashiChop on Jan 25, 2014 19:13:53 GMT -5
WWE started getting really good for me in 2010. TNA hit the shitter for me personally at that point.
Likewise, WWE was horrible with the forcing of Cena down our throats in 2005-2006, a period where TNA singlehandedly rekindled my love for wrestling.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 25, 2014 19:14:36 GMT -5
Hmm? Okay, so they had one match... rest of what I said's still correct, though! Lesnar/Punk was in 2013. |
|
|
|
Post by "Gizzark" Mike Wronglevenay on Jan 25, 2014 19:26:06 GMT -5
Okay, so they had one match... rest of what I said's still correct, though! Lesnar/Punk was in 2013. EVEN WHEN I AM WRONG I AM RIGHT *runs* |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 25, 2014 22:03:00 GMT -5
Never
WWE has never been great. Passable at best in 2003-2004. WWF on the other hand was last "great" in 2000, before they won the wrestling war.
TNA has always been a mess. Good at points, but never great.
|
|
|
|
Post by king1836 on Jan 25, 2014 22:04:26 GMT -5
Never WWE has never been great. Passable at best in 2003-2004. WWF on the other hand was last "great" in 2000, before they won the wrestling war. TNA has always been a mess. Good at points, but never great. I would say TNA was great in 2008 and 2009. |
|
|
|
Post by thelonewolf527 on Jan 25, 2014 22:34:20 GMT -5
Never
|
|
SOR
Unicron
Posts: 2,611
|
Post by SOR on Jan 26, 2014 4:34:43 GMT -5
It's funny when people write that TNA was awesome in 08-09 because everyone bitched about TNA back then. I remember it quite well with people hating on it for being a haven for ex WWE guys and how they never pushed their young guys.
I remember many a post on another board I visited about how Mick Foley sucked or Sting sucked and they both needed to be fired. Jeff Jarrett sucks and needs to leave etc etc
The last year I remember of the IWC actually being in favor of TNA was late 06 or early 2007. The IWC loved WWE in 2005-2006 as well so you're looking at about 8-9 years since most people agreed.
My opinion? I don't watch WWE so I'm going with 2006. Smackdown was great in 2006 and Impact was "What the hell are they going to do next?! I need to tune in!"
|
|
