|
Post by Main Event Mark on Mar 16, 2014 8:23:54 GMT -5
The Executioner of course.
|
|
|
Post by Slingshot Suplay on Mar 16, 2014 10:42:37 GMT -5
If not taker, then Steve Austin, who was managed by percy pringle in uswa.
|
|
Sephiroth
Wade Wilson
Surviving
Posts: 29,006
|
Post by Sephiroth on Mar 16, 2014 12:48:39 GMT -5
Kane seems most likely, but Undertaker is the one who should. I could maybe even see Foley.
|
|
|
Post by Milkman Norm on Mar 16, 2014 12:54:09 GMT -5
The Executioner of course. Sadly he's also dead.
|
|
|
Post by A Platypus Rave on Mar 16, 2014 12:55:57 GMT -5
Kane, Foley or Taker are the only ones I could see being the one to induct him.
|
|
|
Post by Milkman Norm on Mar 16, 2014 13:05:46 GMT -5
He's not a name name and I don't know what terms he's on but Bruce Pritchard would probably a good choice. If Taker refuses to break kayfabe, and I can understand his reasons even if I don't agree, I'd say Foley.
|
|
|
Post by Bob Schlapowitz on Mar 16, 2014 13:09:43 GMT -5
The idea of trying to keep kayfabe alive in this day and age is idiotic. No one other than Undertaker should induct Paul Bearer. I really wish this "break character" nonsense would stop, for crying out loud! He "broke character" for nearly four years as Biker-Taker!
|
|
|
Post by Slammy Award-Winning Cannibal on Mar 16, 2014 13:32:58 GMT -5
He's not a name name and I don't know what terms he's on but Bruce Pritchard would probably a good choice. If Taker refuses to break kayfabe, and I can understand his reasons even if I don't agree, I'd say Foley. Haha imagine that. They have access to Foley, Taker, Kane, any relevant contracted stars that worked with him. The McMahons. Everybody. But no, instead... "Paul Bearer will be inducted... by Brother Love!!!!"
|
|
|
Post by Milkman Norm on Mar 16, 2014 13:38:53 GMT -5
He's not a name name and I don't know what terms he's on but Bruce Pritchard would probably a good choice. If Taker refuses to break kayfabe, and I can understand his reasons even if I don't agree, I'd say Foley. Haha imagine that. They have access to Foley, Taker, Kane, any relevant contracted stars that worked with him. The McMahons. Everybody. But no, instead... "Paul Bearer will be inducted... by Brother Love!!!!" Well Bruce would be good because I think he was pretty close to Percy. But I know that's not what WWE wants. They want a name for the celebration. Which is why I'd say Foley if Undertaker didn't want to break kayfabe.
|
|
|
Post by Slammy Award-Winning Cannibal on Mar 16, 2014 15:46:09 GMT -5
Haha imagine that. They have access to Foley, Taker, Kane, any relevant contracted stars that worked with him. The McMahons. Everybody. But no, instead... "Paul Bearer will be inducted... by Brother Love!!!!" Well Bruce would be good because I think he was pretty close to Percy. But I know that's not what WWE wants. They want a name for the celebration. Which is why I'd say Foley if Undertaker didn't want to break kayfabe. Even if WWE was like, "OK, we're not getting involved, we'll let the fans and/or the WWE family decide the inductee," Bruce Pritchard wouldn't even crack the Top 20.
|
|
StuntGranny®
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Not Actually a Granny
Posts: 16,099
|
Post by StuntGranny® on Mar 16, 2014 15:46:17 GMT -5
I think 'Taker should be the guy to do it, period. Surely he can and should break character for this, if nothing else.
|
|
Crappler El 0 M
Dalek
Never Forgets an Octagon
I'm a good R-Truth.
Posts: 58,479
|
Post by Crappler El 0 M on Mar 16, 2014 15:47:45 GMT -5
Should be Undertaker. Undertaker needs to be involved in some way with the induction of Paul Bearer.
|
|
|
Post by Milkman Norm on Mar 16, 2014 16:30:54 GMT -5
Well Bruce would be good because I think he was pretty close to Percy. But I know that's not what WWE wants. They want a name for the celebration. Which is why I'd say Foley if Undertaker didn't want to break kayfabe. Even if WWE was like, "OK, we're not getting involved, we'll let the fans and/or the WWE family decide the inductee," Bruce Pritchard wouldn't even crack the Top 20. I agree.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 16, 2014 17:25:54 GMT -5
Well Bruce would be good because I think he was pretty close to Percy. But I know that's not what WWE wants. They want a name for the celebration. Which is why I'd say Foley if Undertaker didn't want to break kayfabe. Even if WWE was like, "OK, we're not getting involved, we'll let the fans and/or the WWE family decide the inductee," Bruce Pritchard wouldn't even crack the Top 20. Plus, doesn't Steph hate him? I recall his firing was one of those "things that was a long time coming" deal. (Also isn't he still with TNA?)
|
|
|
Post by Slammy Award-Winning Cannibal on Mar 16, 2014 17:38:49 GMT -5
Even if WWE was like, "OK, we're not getting involved, we'll let the fans and/or the WWE family decide the inductee," Bruce Pritchard wouldn't even crack the Top 20. Plus, doesn't Steph hate him? I recall his firing was one of those "things that was a long time coming" deal. (Also isn't he still with TNA?) He's long gone from TNA. I guess my point is Pritchard would be a terrible choice as an inductee.
|
|