Should Superstars turn into Raw Pre-Show Matches?

[jetsonic]

what do you guys think?

[The Trashman]

I like Superstars

[CATCH_US IS the Conversation]

I like Superstars.

But I wish they had more matches so that the undercard guys have more opportunities to work instead of just sitting on the sidelines. The three hour RAWs really screwed them over. They're not "worthy" of being on RAW, but since shooting RAW is so time consuming and they don't want to burn out the crowd, they've cut Superstars down to two matches, and don't even have an opening dark match anymore.

[slappy]

Superstars would be fine if they didn't spend the majority of it on recaps.

[CATCH_US IS the Conversation]

Mar 15, 2014 23:08:13 GMT -5 slappy said:

Superstars would be fine if they didn't spend the majority of it on recaps.

I agree. The WWE's own network makes recaps redundant.

[Crappler El 0 M]

They still get TV rights for Superstars which airs in some markets outside of the U.S., so it's worth continuing for them.

[Oh Cry Me a Screwball]

Mar 15, 2014 23:38:41 GMT -5 Crappler El 0 M said:

They still get TV rights for Superstars which airs in some markets outside of the U.S., so it's worth continuing for them.

That's pretty much the only reason Superstars exists, and Main Event hasn't totally regressed into a C-show.

[Macho Pichu]

I was always under the assumption that the only people who watched Superstars were the Raw audience that saw it live.

[Deleted]

Superstars is great as a forum for nobodies to have matches.

I honestly wish it were given more creative consideration.

Why burn your bottom card guys up doing jobs on Raw or SD when you could groom and feel them out on a show that's kind of off the radar?