Johnny D
Don Corleone
Creature of the Night Forever
Posts: 2,090
|
Post by Johnny D on Apr 8, 2014 7:22:31 GMT -5
Now a certain one has ended "up north", what can TNA do to make a streak of well.....anything?
|
|
|
Post by ________ has left the building on Apr 8, 2014 7:57:33 GMT -5
The weekly streak of Samoa Joe wrestling with a shirt on.
The streak of EY reminding everyone he's a veteran in TNA in his promos.
The streak of ODB not wrestling.
The streak of how long Knux's vignettes will last.
The streak of how long TNA will let Jeff Hardy continue to be Willow.
The streak of Ladyboy Chaser being assaulted, kidnapped, and anally abused by Willow.
|
|
|
Post by "Gizzark" Mike Wronglevenay on Apr 8, 2014 7:59:46 GMT -5
Book Ray Stevens for a musical performance.
|
|
|
Post by Jedi-El of Tomorrow on Apr 8, 2014 8:14:36 GMT -5
I thought it said steak ideas, at first.
- The streak of only Mr Anderson trying to stop Samuel Shaw from murdering Christy Hemme, and Christy being all smiles if Shaw's not around.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 8, 2014 8:22:58 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by A Platypus Rave on Apr 8, 2014 8:56:58 GMT -5
Streak of the TV title not being defended or mentioned?
|
|
Push R Truth
Patti Mayonnaise
Unique and Special Snowflake, and a pants-less heathen.
Perpetually Constipated
Posts: 39,281
|
Post by Push R Truth on Apr 8, 2014 12:20:01 GMT -5
1.1 Infinity Streak
|
|
|
Post by bluemeii on Apr 8, 2014 13:14:53 GMT -5
TNA streak ideas?? The knockouts running up and down my street naked for my amusement.
|
|
Brood Lone Wolf Funker
Ozymandius
Got fined anyway. Possibly a Moose
James Franco is the white Donald Glover
Posts: 61,853
|
Post by Brood Lone Wolf Funker on Apr 8, 2014 16:16:18 GMT -5
Crimson had a pretty nice streak for a while.
|
|
|
Post by Zombie Mod is not a ghoul. on Apr 8, 2014 16:46:10 GMT -5
if this thread leads to a male wrestler being naked mideon 2.0 I'm going to suspend you for a week or 50 (maybe.)
kidding, I wouldn't abuse my power as a mod in that way, but that is how I see t.n.a. doing a streak (considering how badly they did the Goldberg version of a streak with crimson.)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 8, 2014 19:27:17 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by psychokiller on Apr 8, 2014 20:23:17 GMT -5
There's really no one on their roster where a winning streak gimmick would work much. I don't think it'll ever work again in general though due to the fact that fans will always just consider it a rip off of Goldberg or Taker.
|
|
|
Post by Can you afford to pay me, Gah on Apr 8, 2014 21:41:52 GMT -5
There's really no one on their roster where a winning streak gimmick would work much. I don't think it'll ever work again in general though due to the fact that fans will always just consider it a rip off of Goldberg or Taker. Yes and no. They where both different kinds of streaks. I mean Goldberg was unbeaten period for a length of time and Taker was unbeaten at just the biggest wrestling event of the year. Now Taker streak wasn't recognized until he was well into the streak. I think Ten was when they started too talk about it. When counted his fingers too Ten. It was at 12 when they really brought it up when he faced Orton. Goldberg didn't start really counting the numbers until like 30 or 40 wins. TNA tried it with Crimson but it falled because he wasn't dominating and had nothing that stood out. Just a bunch of wins without a number. Goldberg worked because he had this look, strength and move set too make it work. Now it can work if they have a guy who is dominate moveset, has something that stands out, and is over. Or like Taker the show itself is a big deal and the guy who having the streak is again a Main Event star and has something about him that makes him the myth and Legend. TNA just doesn't have anyone like them and they don't have a show truly big enough too make work. As big they claim BFG is it even in the same world as WM is. Hell that PPV maybe label big but if you are not filling an arena that is SMALLER then your average Raw, then it not that huge.
|
|
|
Post by psychokiller on Apr 8, 2014 22:24:12 GMT -5
There's really no one on their roster where a winning streak gimmick would work much. I don't think it'll ever work again in general though due to the fact that fans will always just consider it a rip off of Goldberg or Taker. Yes and no. They where both different kinds of streaks. I mean Goldberg was unbeaten period for a length of time and Taker was unbeaten at just the biggest wrestling event of the year. Now Taker streak wasn't recognized until he was well into the streak. I think Ten was when they started too talk about it. When counted his fingers too Ten. It was at 12 when they really brought it up when he faced Orton. Goldberg didn't start really counting the numbers until like 30 or 40 wins. TNA tried it with Crimson but it falled because he wasn't dominating and had nothing that stood out. Just a bunch of wins without a number. Goldberg worked because he had this look, strength and move set too make it work. Now it can work if they have a guy who is dominate moveset, has something that stands out, and is over. Or like Taker the show itself is a big deal and the guy who having the streak is again a Main Event star and has something about him that makes him the myth and Legend. TNA just doesn't have anyone like them and they don't have a show truly big enough too make work. As big they claim BFG is it even in the same world as WM is. Hell that PPV maybe label big but if you are not filling an arena that is SMALLER then your average Raw, then it not that huge. Perhaps, but of the guys on the current roster in TNA I don't see it working for any of them. Maybe just Lashley, but he probably only has limited dates on his schedule. I think WWE could do some sort of undefeated gimmick going with Roman Reigns when he becomes a singles wrestler. Since the Goldberg streak got huge in 1998, I always wanted to see two guys who have been undefeated for a really long time wrestle each other at one of the big PPVs. Just imagine how much interest there could be with 2 extremely over guys who never lost a match, wrestling at WrestleMania. But as I said I don't know how it would get over to begin with due to the constant comparisons there would be with Goldberg & possibly Taker.
|
|
|
Post by Can you afford to pay me, Gah on Apr 8, 2014 22:40:52 GMT -5
Yes and no. They where both different kinds of streaks. I mean Goldberg was unbeaten period for a length of time and Taker was unbeaten at just the biggest wrestling event of the year. Now Taker streak wasn't recognized until he was well into the streak. I think Ten was when they started too talk about it. When counted his fingers too Ten. It was at 12 when they really brought it up when he faced Orton. Goldberg didn't start really counting the numbers until like 30 or 40 wins. TNA tried it with Crimson but it falled because he wasn't dominating and had nothing that stood out. Just a bunch of wins without a number. Goldberg worked because he had this look, strength and move set too make it work. Now it can work if they have a guy who is dominate moveset, has something that stands out, and is over. Or like Taker the show itself is a big deal and the guy who having the streak is again a Main Event star and has something about him that makes him the myth and Legend. TNA just doesn't have anyone like them and they don't have a show truly big enough too make work. As big they claim BFG is it even in the same world as WM is. Hell that PPV maybe label big but if you are not filling an arena that is SMALLER then your average Raw, then it not that huge. Perhaps, but of the guys on the current roster in TNA I don't see it working for any of them. Maybe just Lashley, but he probably only has limited dates on his schedule. I think WWE could do some sort of undefeated gimmick going with Roman Reigns when he becomes a singles wrestler. Since the Goldberg streak got huge in 1998, I always wanted to see two guys who have been undefeated for a really long time wrestle each other at one of the big PPVs. Just imagine how much interest there could be with 2 extremely over guys who never lost a match, wrestling at WrestleMania. But as I said I don't know how it would get over to begin with due to the constant comparisons there would be with Goldberg & possibly Taker. I agree nobody in TNA could really pull it off. Not even Lashley really because as you said he likely limited dates. I do agree the WWE best bet would be Reigns. It may be compared too Taker and Goldberg but if you have the moves and the look. The mannerisms it can work. The only problem is too find that kind of person. The Undertaker style is way more tougher because it takes a special talent too pull that character off like he did. Which had a lot too do with the streak because what kind of character it was.
|
|
Johnny D
Don Corleone
Creature of the Night Forever
Posts: 2,090
|
Post by Johnny D on Apr 10, 2014 6:12:27 GMT -5
if this thread leads to a male wrestler being naked mideon 2.0 I'm going to suspend you for a week or 50 (maybe.) kidding, I wouldn't abuse my power as a mod in that way, but that is how I see t.n.a. doing a streak (considering how badly they did the Goldberg version of a streak with crimson.) Haha, you KNOW they would try it too! Especially with that moron Russo around.
|
|