|
|
Post by Non Banjoble Tokens on Jun 10, 2014 0:18:37 GMT -5
I watched "Thor: The Dark World" this past weekend and I thought it was pretty good. What's the general consensus about this film? Did people enjoy it for the most part? Or did most people dislike it? What did all you FANatics think of the movie?
I should mention that I haven't seen the first Thor movie, but I did see "The Avengers." I also don't have much knowledge about the comics at all.
|
|
mizerable
Fry's dog Seymour
You're the lowest on the totem pole here, Alva. The lowest.
Posts: 23,475
|
Post by mizerable on Jun 10, 2014 0:20:49 GMT -5
It was okay. Nothing special. They did the right thing by making the bad guys generic, everyone knew that would be the Thor/Loki movie, there's no reason to even f*** with that formula.
|
|
|
|
Post by Instant Classic on Jun 10, 2014 0:21:28 GMT -5
Same for the last sentence.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 10, 2014 0:26:19 GMT -5
Nowhere near as good or memorable as the first one. This one was just serviceable film that isn't bad but just average. You just kind of zone out until Loki or Kat Dennings is on screen
|
|
|
|
Post by Amazing Kitsune on Jun 10, 2014 0:29:20 GMT -5
It was really good. Not quite as good as the first one, but on the same level.
|
|
|
|
Post by Display Name on Jun 10, 2014 0:34:46 GMT -5
It was alright.Loki turning into you-know-who was funny.Less Kat Dennings would have been awesome.
|
|
|
|
Post by DSR on Jun 10, 2014 0:56:08 GMT -5
Enjoyable. Though I'll agree the first one was better, for the most part. They probably should've added Loki's name to the title on this one.
|
|
|
|
Post by Wolf Hawkfield no1 NZ poster on Jun 10, 2014 0:56:43 GMT -5
Well I thought it was much better than the first one.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 10, 2014 0:59:01 GMT -5
My biggest problem with the individual Avenger movies is that if the world was in SOO MUCH danger, why don't the Avengers re-assemble? Or at least get help from other supporting members?
Personally, I think for these movies to continue, the story line has to be more personal, and less "world saving".
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 10, 2014 1:11:44 GMT -5
Nowhere near as good or memorable as the first one. This one was just serviceable film that isn't bad but just average. You just kind of zone out until Loki or Kat Dennings is on screen And in the last one's case hope something kills her. |
|
mattperiolat
King Koopa
Thank you, Brodie... for everything.
Posts: 11,445
|
Post by mattperiolat on Jun 10, 2014 1:20:41 GMT -5
Top three Marvel movie for me at the time of release (behind Iron Man and Thor). I really enjoyed it, thought it was a fun ride and at least on par with the original. Keep in mind, I went into Thor with LOW expectations when it came out but was pleasantly surprised.
|
|
|
|
Post by OGBoardPoster2005 on Jun 10, 2014 1:25:36 GMT -5
I loved it. It didn't need to be a spectacle, or even an overly done complex film. It was fast, it was fun, and it had great moments. Enjoyed it. Not all Superhero films need to be "The Avengers" or "The Dark Knight".
|
|
|
|
Post by Psy on Jun 10, 2014 1:34:05 GMT -5
I enjoyed it. Good little popcorn flick. I don't get the Kat Dennings hate, she even had my favorite line in the first movie.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 10, 2014 1:37:50 GMT -5
It was solid. Nothing amazing, but solid. I did like how much of the plot was spent away from earth.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Summer of Muskrat XVII on Jun 10, 2014 1:41:13 GMT -5
It was a decent flick, but it really was the MCU equivalent of an X-Files Monster of the Week episode, it felt like it was rather inconsequential to the greater narrative. Especially since I'm pretty sure it's confirmed Loki won't be appearing again before Thor 3.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mighty Attack Tribble on Jun 10, 2014 1:48:43 GMT -5
One of my favourite Marvel films. Doesn't take itself too seriously, but not to the point of self-parody; Tom Hiddleston stole the show yet again (what I wouldn't give for a Loki movie or miniseries); and I don't give a crap what anybody says, Kat Dennings was entertaining throughout.
Still not a lick of chemistry between Natalie Portman and Chris Hemsworth though.
|
|
Professor Chaos
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Bringer of Destruction and Maker of Doom
Posts: 16,332
|
Post by Professor Chaos on Jun 10, 2014 1:57:25 GMT -5
I didn't care much for it. Loved the first. Also if Kat Dennings isn't showing off her rack I don't see the point of her being in anything.
|
|
Jiren
Patti Mayonnaise
Hearts Bayformers
Posts: 35,163
|
Post by Jiren on Jun 10, 2014 5:26:51 GMT -5
Good but I wished they'd toned down on the comedy.
I like humour in movies bit this went OTT (As did Iron Man 3)
|
|
|
|
Post by Bang Bang Bart on Jun 10, 2014 6:24:47 GMT -5
It was a fine enough movie, but not my favorite out of the Phase Two films (behind Iron Man 3 and Captain America: The Winter Soldier). {Spoiler}I did find the Cap cameo funny, though. |
|
|
|
Post by Feyrhausen on Jun 10, 2014 6:28:51 GMT -5
My biggest problem with the individual Avenger movies is that if the world was in SOO MUCH danger, why don't the Avengers re-assemble? Or at least get help from other supporting members? Personally, I think for these movies to continue, the story line has to be more personal, and less "world saving". Iron Man blew up all his suits. Captain America could have been on a SHIELD mission or being held back by SHIELD in case Thor can't get the job done. By the time Hulk got there (on a jet lent by Tony) the situation would have been over. Hawkeye and Black Widow would have been in the same situation as Cap. |
|
