|
|
Post by radiantsilvergun on Oct 26, 2014 23:17:26 GMT -5
Just wondering after seeing some of this Rollins/Ambrose talk. Did Taker get revenge against HBK after Kane interfered, or did HBK dip before it could happen? There's probably a few comparisons to Rollins/Ambrose in there somewhere. Who knows.
|
|
|
|
Post by ChitownKnight on Oct 26, 2014 23:18:43 GMT -5
12 years later at Wrestlemania 25
|
|
TheDieselTrain
Fry's dog Seymour
Chicks Dig Hootie.
Is Stone Cold gonna have to smack a bitch?? WHAT!!!?????
Posts: 23,724
|
Post by TheDieselTrain on Oct 26, 2014 23:27:22 GMT -5
I'd say breaking his back at Royal Rumble made them even.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 26, 2014 23:32:45 GMT -5
Why do you think he taped his fists?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 26, 2014 23:40:31 GMT -5
From a storyline standpoint? Not until years later.
In real life? f*** yeah, injured that man quickly.
|
|
|
|
Post by xxshoyuweeniexx on Oct 26, 2014 23:51:49 GMT -5
Well he did retire HBK.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 27, 2014 0:11:15 GMT -5
|
|
Cranjis McBasketball
Crow T. Robot
Knew what the hell that thing was supposed to be
Peace Love and Nothing But
Posts: 41,959
Member is Online
|
Post by Cranjis McBasketball on Oct 27, 2014 4:22:31 GMT -5
They never did acknowledge Taker "retiring" him the first time, did they? Might have been a nice little add.... |
|
|
|
Post by Adam Black on Oct 27, 2014 6:32:44 GMT -5
You can count Royal Rumble 2007 too though I was really pissed Taker reached a decade at WM XXV before having his revenge and even then the match wasn't even about that.
|
|
