RIHT
Hank Scorpio
Wanted a title with "YOU'RE WELCOME!"
Close enough.
Hey-yo.
Posts: 5,897
|
Post by RIHT on Jan 7, 2015 2:54:43 GMT -5
For whatever reason, Smackdown's move to Thursday got me to thinking about the brand split. With Smackdown being very lackluster (basically a replay of Raw), would a brand split help spice the shows up? Personally, I'd split the brands, but do it like in early 2012, where there were 2 brands, but one set of titles, so guys in title feuds could appear on both shows. What do you think? Vote in the poll and comment below.
|
|
jemtruman
ALF
Chances are, I stole it from the tumbles.
Posts: 1,238
|
Post by jemtruman on Jan 7, 2015 3:08:35 GMT -5
I'd prefer no brand split, but Smackdown used to highlight different story lines than Raw. I haven't watched Smackdown in a couple years because of the replay/rehash issues.
Take the midcard story lines to Smackdown and let them actually bloom there instead of being a 5 minute match with no true arc, use it to actually develop the midcard and undercard talent. Give it similar attention that NXT is getting as far as writing and match appeal. Still, let the big names show up from week to week, and have matches with the upper midcard guys-- let the matches be more randomized and less focused around a single feud or the same 4 guys facing each other week after week after week.
|
|
|
|
Post by CATCH_US IS the Conversation on Jan 7, 2015 3:40:18 GMT -5
RAW as the main event/upper midcard show, SmackDown as a larger scale NXT Redemption where lower carders get character development and time to shine.
|
|
|
|
Post by Session Moth is over on Jan 7, 2015 4:05:28 GMT -5
No brandsplit. You have WWE and NXT, thats enough.
|
|
