|
|
Post by CeilingFan on Jan 7, 2015 7:24:21 GMT -5
Why didn't this match happen at WrestleMania? It could've happened in 2011. Instead we got Taker vs. Triple H (Which already happened in 2001), and a mediocre match between Cena and The Miz.
|
|
mrbananagrabber
King Koopa
Paul Heyman's unofficial joke writer
Posts: 11,807
|
Post by mrbananagrabber on Jan 7, 2015 7:38:09 GMT -5
Out of the potential big money matches they've ever had, Cena vs the Streak is their biggest missed opportunity, and I have no idea why it didn't happen. Instead we got rematches with HHH and HBK. What a waste.
|
|
|
|
Post by CeilingFan on Jan 7, 2015 8:50:49 GMT -5
Out of the potential big money matches they've ever had, Cena vs the Streak is their biggest missed opportunity, and I have no idea why it didn't happen. Instead we got rematches with HHH and HBK. What a waste. I agree about Triple H. Cena vs. Undertaker at WM28 would've been better than Cena vs. Rock. Triple H could've had the night off. |
|
|
|
Post by "Gizzark" Mike Wronglevenay on Jan 7, 2015 8:54:52 GMT -5
Because Cena was always f***ing champion or challenging for the belt rather than challenging Taker.
It really is hilarious that WWE misses money matches like this sometimes. I had absolutely no desire to see it and almost no interest in the streak, but that match would f***ing draw.
|
|
|
|
Post by A Platypus Rave on Jan 7, 2015 9:04:07 GMT -5
Part of it was probably they figured they could have two marketable matches instead of putting the two together and having one.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 7, 2015 9:38:56 GMT -5
Well if anyone wants to track it down, Cena/Taker already happened on Smackdown back in 2004. Pretty good match IMO.
|
|
|
|
Post by A Platypus Rave on Jan 7, 2015 9:43:25 GMT -5
Well if anyone wants to track it down, Cena/Taker already happened on Smackdown back in 2004. Pretty good match IMO. It also happened on PPV Vengeance 2003... though that was Pre-main event run Cena and Pre-re-undead Taker  |
|
