|
|
Post by Widow's Peak on Jan 23, 2015 23:24:25 GMT -5
What would you be the happiest (or least miserable) seeing as his Mania match?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 23, 2015 23:29:30 GMT -5
If not Bryan / Lesnar for the title, then Bryan / Rollins for the title. Though I will also accept being against Cena for the title and really anybody except Sheamus or Kane. Not too interested in Bryan / Lesnar without the title on the line, though - story's only really there with the belt as part of it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Magic knows Black Lives Matter on Jan 23, 2015 23:45:07 GMT -5
Roman/Cena for the title. Ya'll can hate all ya'll want, I would love the hell out of that match.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 23, 2015 23:48:45 GMT -5
Roman/Cena for the title. Ya'll can hate all ya'll want, I would love the hell out of that match. Nah, I'd just like Roman/Cena without the title. Let Roman roam with Big Match John for a bit and if he can do well with him on the big stage? He's primed to continue. |
|
|
|
Post by Instant Classic on Jan 23, 2015 23:50:19 GMT -5
Ziggler vs Rollins
|
|
lionheart21
Patti Mayonnaise
Once did a thing...
Posts: 30,531 
|
Post by lionheart21 on Jan 23, 2015 23:53:25 GMT -5
If we don't get Bryan/Lesnar, then Bryan/Rollins would be the next best thing. Having Bryan have to overcome the odds in the WM main event once again, except against the Authority's newest golden boy.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 23, 2015 23:54:04 GMT -5
Roman/Cena for the title. Ya'll can hate all ya'll want, I would love the hell out of that match. Without the title, it could work. With the title though... I don't really think so. If you position it as Reigns calling his spot and saying he wants to be the guy and needs to steamroll Cena to do it and they do a clashing ideologies thing of Reigns dropping the goofy shit and just being a badass, that could be pretty cool and get people on his side, and Cena likely could carry him to a good match. For the title though it'd just be, "The two biggest stars clashing in the company, OHMIGOD!" and people who might side with Reigns on the basis he's not Cena likely wouldn't in this case since it'd see him with the title afterward instead of just with a big but mostly meaningless win. It'd basically just be the Cena / Lashley match all over again, they were clearly going for a split crowd and trying to get the people who hated Cena to cheer for Lashley, but instead everybody just cheered for Cena while Lashley basically just got dead silence the whole time. |
|
|
|
Post by Nickybojelais on Jan 24, 2015 0:04:09 GMT -5
Roman/Cena for the title. Ya'll can hate all ya'll want, I would love the hell out of that match. Save it for Wrestlemania 32 at Jerry World, give Reigns a year to perfect his work and it will be this generations Hogan v Warrior. |
|
mizerable
Fry's dog Seymour
You're the lowest on the totem pole here, Alva. The lowest.
Posts: 23,475
|
Post by mizerable on Jan 24, 2015 0:10:32 GMT -5
Roman/Cena for the title. Ya'll can hate all ya'll want, I would love the hell out of that match. Nah, I'd just like Roman/Cena without the title. Let Roman roam with Big Match John for a bit and if he can do well with him on the big stage? He's primed to continue. This is my thought too. Hell, I'd actually tease the passing of the torch thing, have Cena go over this year, giving Roman his first big singles' loss and have that motivate him to beat Cena next year, who could possibly be champion. You could even tie in all the stuff that happened with Cena/Rock and draw the same parallels but with Roman in the Cena role this time. And at the end of this Mania, if Roman clearly doesn't have it, they can drop it without having a potentially disastrous title reign on their hands. |
|
