|
Post by radiantsilvergun on Feb 28, 2015 18:25:07 GMT -5
I've seen alot of people say that Rollins should but thats f***ing ridiculous. He need's to get his ass kicked at WM. What do you guys think?
|
|
|
Post by Mid-Carder on Feb 28, 2015 18:26:52 GMT -5
Ordinarily, the "new" guy should but I wouldn't be too mad about Orton winning since the victory story is his, really, for vengeance. Plus Rollins has been booked so strongly that a loss won't harm him at all.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 28, 2015 18:32:03 GMT -5
Orton.
Rollins has steam for putting Orton out of action last year and Orton's returned. He needs his revenge. The main reason is the briefcase though. Rollins can lose to Orton and still be elevated once he cashes in so both guys look good.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 28, 2015 18:36:29 GMT -5
Maybe it can be a double turn. Rollins isn't going to stay heel forever, and if he cashes on Reigns, that's a face turn right there.
|
|
|
Post by Mayonnaise on Feb 28, 2015 18:41:40 GMT -5
Orton. Everyone thinks he finally got his comeuppance by losing to Orton on the biggest stage of them all....and bam, successful cash in to end the show meaning Orton is the new top contender.
|
|
BigJerichool222
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
THE BIG DOG!
#NotInMySalad
Posts: 17,424
|
Post by BigJerichool222 on Feb 28, 2015 18:52:15 GMT -5
Orton, obviously. For some reason WWE ALWAYS has the successful heel case holder being humbled on the same night he cashes in to somehow make it more shocking.
Except at this point, it's become expected.
|
|
|
Post by PTBartman on Feb 28, 2015 18:55:09 GMT -5
John Stewart turns on Orton and helps Rollins get the win and we find out the whole thing between them was a set-up
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 28, 2015 18:56:50 GMT -5
John Stewart turns on Orton and helps Rollins get the win and we find out the whole thing between them was a set-up A new stable led by Jon Stewart going up against a stable lead by Paul Heyman would be money.
|
|
|
Post by PsychoGoatee on Feb 28, 2015 18:57:19 GMT -5
I would say Rollins, granted him cashing in that night (or soon after at least) does make the outcome of that match not such a biggie. If it was Ambrose I'd say he deserves to finally get that win, in Orton's case I'm gonna go with Rollins. The FUTURE of THIS BUSINESS, the STANDARD BEAR baby. If Reigns got to beat Randy, Rollins should be able to do it, especially with the J&J security boys.
|
|
|
Post by sportatorium on Feb 28, 2015 18:57:57 GMT -5
Rollins. Orton can get the win back at a different PPV. Rollins is a top young heel & a win over Randy at Mania is a huge deal.
|
|
|
Post by Starshine on Feb 28, 2015 19:05:48 GMT -5
Rollins. Orton going over would be as bad as that time Kane went over Randy.
|
|
Mochi Lone Wolf
Fry's dog Seymour
Development through Destruction.
Posts: 24,038
|
Post by Mochi Lone Wolf on Feb 28, 2015 19:26:24 GMT -5
That depends.
Do they plan on making Orton a contender after Rollins cashes in? If so, then have Orton win.
Do they plan on having Orton meander in upper mid-card feuds against Big Show and Kane like he did on Smackdown in 2011 and 2012? If so, then have Rollins win.
Don't have Orton beat Rollins simply because it will make his cash-in after the main event "shocking."
We all expect something like that now. It's not surprising anymore.
|
|
|
Post by 1 Free Moon-Down with Burger on Feb 28, 2015 19:27:38 GMT -5
Orton should win.
Rollins can regain any 'lost momentum' very easily with the briefcase.
|
|
|
Post by Kayfabe FAN don't want none on Feb 28, 2015 19:35:01 GMT -5
Ambrose should go over Seth....
Bahahahaha, good story telling and continuity? To hell with that.
|
|
|
Post by Neo: "The One" who CLAPS on Feb 28, 2015 20:47:15 GMT -5
Orton. Everyone thinks he finally got his comeuppance by losing to Orton on the biggest stage of them all....and bam, successful cash in to end the show meaning Orton is the new top contender. Exactly. Wrestling booking 101. So of course WWE will have Rollins win cleanly and then cash in later in the night.
|
|
|
Post by Instant Classic on Feb 28, 2015 21:37:39 GMT -5
Orton all the way, then have Seth win the title at the end of the night.
|
|
|
Post by thelonewolf527 on Feb 28, 2015 21:39:45 GMT -5
Orton is gonna win. Rollins needs to get his ass kicked after being a dick for 10 months straight without much comeuppance
But can someone explain the logic to me (personal feelings aside) of building up this big babyface for months, only to have him lose in 5 minutes to end WrestleMania?
|
|
JTH
Dennis Stamp
Sigs/Avatars cannot exceed 3MB
Posts: 4,467
|
Post by JTH on Feb 28, 2015 21:40:54 GMT -5
Orton should win. Rollins can regain any 'lost momentum' very easily with the briefcase.
|
|
|
Post by Ruthless Pessimism on Feb 28, 2015 21:45:20 GMT -5
Orton should win but only just barely.
Then later he (or John Stewart) can cost Rollins his cash-in against Reigns.
|
|
Dang!
Dennis Stamp
Posts: 4,279
|
Post by Dang! on Feb 28, 2015 21:56:40 GMT -5
Orton should beat Rollins because he should feud with him for the WWE title. If Orton beats Rollins he has a reason to say that he should be #1 contender because he beat the champ.
|
|