Bo Rida
Fry's dog Seymour
Pulled one over on everyone. Got away with it, this time.
Posts: 23,580
|
Post by Bo Rida on Sept 24, 2015 10:31:43 GMT -5
Oh sure, NOW they do Cena vs Undertaker. Not when it was my most anticipated match, not when it would have mattered.
|
|
|
Post by Stu on Sept 24, 2015 10:32:58 GMT -5
all of those plans suck. There is no more mystique to an Undertaker mania match without the streak I get what you're saying, but there's an added benefited. It's always been like the Royal Rumble, where there was always a limited number of guys who could win and everyone else was fodder. In this case, Undertaker matches are more flexible. Without the streak, matches can be used to put over younger guys instead of being limited to established main eventers who could believably beat 'Taker. "Here are matches that we think might happen, but we really have no clue at the moment." This is pretty much how I view all "news." I believe everything reported is taken out of proportion. In reality, things play out like this: Creative: Think we should have Sting face Rollins? Vince: Maybe, but I don't know. Maybe Rollins and Brock again? Or Reigns? We'll work on this for now. *Ten minutes later Newz site: OMGZZZZZ, the plan is to have Rollins face Sting or Brock!!!!
|
|
mcstoklasa
Hank Scorpio
Sigs/Avatars cannot exceed 1MB
Posts: 6,944
|
Post by mcstoklasa on Sept 24, 2015 10:32:58 GMT -5
Oh sure, NOW they do Cena vs Undertaker. Not when it was my most anticipated match, not when it would have mattered. I think it would still be highly enjoyable. They could add the I quit stipulation
|
|
|
Post by A Platypus Rave on Sept 24, 2015 10:33:25 GMT -5
"WWE doesn't like to bring back talent over 50 when they are injured in the ring. Meanwhile, The Undertaker's plans..." Technically Taker is 50 not over 50...
|
|
|
Post by Mayonnaise on Sept 24, 2015 10:33:58 GMT -5
"WWE doesn't like to bring back talent over 50 when they are injured in the ring. Meanwhile, The Undertaker's plans..." Loophole! Undertaker is just 50, not over 50! He won't be over 50 until next year so that doesn't apply yet.
|
|
|
Post by Tea & Crumpets on Sept 24, 2015 10:37:31 GMT -5
Undertaker/Rollins I could be down with, but I'd rather see Taker/Cena. Cannot see why Taker/Slamwell is an option.
Roman/Brock II I'd be down with, or if it won't be for the title then Austin/Brock, but I don't see that happening. Don't give a toss about Rock coming back anymore, there's nobody I want to see him go up against and there's nobody he's going to put over.
|
|
|
Post by wallabylikeyou on Sept 24, 2015 10:40:35 GMT -5
Steve Austin will be stone cold in the ground and we'll still be getting newz about him coming back for Mania.
|
|
wisdomwizard
King Koopa
Too Salty
Watching you.
Posts: 11,087
|
Post by wisdomwizard on Sept 24, 2015 10:40:50 GMT -5
Streak or no streak, a Cena vs. Undertaker would still work because it's not forgone conclusion who wins. Heck, if anything the streak being broken add to my anticipation for it. As for Brock, let him face Rollins or Reigns or the two in a Triple Threat Match. I love Rock, but let him have a break from the ring. Stone Cold might be an iteresting opponent for him but I'm not sure because of his medical history.
|
|
|
Post by Aboutreika18 on Sept 24, 2015 10:41:01 GMT -5
Taker vs Cena sounds like a good way to keep both of them from killing the momentum of some upcoming talent, so it sounds good to me.
Although obviously, it should've been done years ago and definitely before the streak was broken. Unbelievable WWE passed this up for so many years.
|
|
|
Post by audiencewatching on Sept 24, 2015 10:42:20 GMT -5
Omg its so easy, it writes itself Taker vs Cena Or Taker vs Sting Reigns vs Rollins Vs Ambrose Rock Vs Lesnar
|
|
FAR5222
El Dandy
Counted 237 Bros. SWERVE Got no cookie for it.
Posts: 7,889
|
Post by FAR5222 on Sept 24, 2015 10:45:36 GMT -5
Every year when these reports come out I get excited and then when I read it the excitement is gone for how shitty these plans are. I'm so bored of WWE. Do something different for f*** sake.
|
|
auph10imitated
Dennis Stamp
Sigs/Avatars cannot exceed 1MB
Posts: 4,951
|
Post by auph10imitated on Sept 24, 2015 10:49:04 GMT -5
Seem a bit crappy compared to previous two years.
I think to be honest the best way to make use of Undertaker and Sting, is have them tag team together. You benefit of them being in the same ring together, neither has to do the job (I mean should Sting REALLY lose again?) and both limited in what they can do it gives them both the benefit. Not sure of a strong enough team to face them though, The Dudleys, The Wyatt Family, The New Day etc alll good but it just doesnt feel special. But if im going with one then it would be The Wyatt Family, hell.. team Kane with them and do a six person tag team match.
Undertaker, Sting and Kane vs The Wyatt Family. Entrances alone would be cool.
Rollins vs Reigns vs Ambrose really should be done, bring them full circle. Wether its for the title or not is the question, it should be.
Brock and Rock doesnt really interest me.
As for anything else, nothing even looks remotely clear cut at this point in time. Had they kept Rusev as the killer he was before Mania, Brock vs Rusev would have been pretty cool to see.
|
|
|
Post by Mayonnaise on Sept 24, 2015 10:50:45 GMT -5
Headline with Lesnar v. Taker v. Cena for the US Title.
|
|
|
Post by Stu on Sept 24, 2015 10:54:42 GMT -5
You know, none of these matches are actually happening yet. It's only rumor and speculation. Nothing to get upset about just yet.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 24, 2015 10:54:52 GMT -5
Hate how the Mania plans aren't like "so how do we culminate a big storyline?, and instead "who's gonna wrestle Sting? who's gonna wrestle Taker? who's gonna wrestle Brock?
|
|
|
Post by Andy Martin on Sept 24, 2015 10:56:08 GMT -5
Hate how the Mania plans aren't like "so how do we culminate a big storyline?, and instead "who's gonna wrestle Sting? who's gonna wrestle Taker? who's gonna wrestle Brock? And all These reports basically add up to "we have no f***ing clue"
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 24, 2015 11:07:19 GMT -5
I wouldn't mind Cena vs. Taker
|
|
|
Post by Jedi-El of Tomorrow on Sept 24, 2015 11:07:34 GMT -5
One thing I've been wondering since the end of WM31, one thing that even sticks out on this... Who's Triple H facing at WM? I haven't heard a thing about it. I know they've wanted him to face Rollins or Reigns this year but I'm not sure about WM. Another thing, no Ambrose. Damn. Finally, The Rock and Triple H will have a one on one match at Wrestlemania.
|
|
|
Post by Magic knows Black Lives Matter on Sept 24, 2015 11:19:32 GMT -5
Quit f***ing around and do Undertaker/Cena at Mania before Taker has to retire. Come on now! You hinted at that match like 6 years ago and there's been nothing since.
|
|
Dub H
Crow T. Robot
Captain Pixel: the Game Master
I ❤ Aniki
Posts: 47,875
|
Post by Dub H on Sept 24, 2015 11:21:46 GMT -5
Remember when people did not want Reigns to face lesnar?We should try that again.
Also,Taker matches means MUCH less now.
|
|