Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 24, 2015 15:11:35 GMT -5
Reigns needs to win the title.
He wasn't ready last year, this year he will be. He's got his character, he's expanded his moveset, he's got some fan goodwill. It's time.
|
|
Sparkybob
King Koopa
I have a status?
Posts: 10,990
|
Post by Sparkybob on Sept 24, 2015 15:30:01 GMT -5
Whether they want to elevate them or not is completely separate from anything having to do with Brock. Not at all. I've heard this argument before about the part-timers not holding back the actual roster and it doesn't hold weight. The reason nobody is being elevated is because they have all these part timers on call they can rely on instead. No, if the WWE wanted to make Owens near Lesnar level they will like they did with Reigns and Rollins. Whether the WWE wants to push any of those 3 guys has nothing to do with Lesnar and more whether the WWE wants them to be top stars or not.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 24, 2015 16:09:02 GMT -5
All of this sounds blah to me.
|
|
|
Post by Widow's Peak on Sept 24, 2015 18:35:28 GMT -5
There was a perfectly easy way to book a Shield triple threat, but noooooo. We had to give Sheamus the briefcase, didn't we? *grumble*
|
|
|
Post by Kevin Hamilton on Sept 24, 2015 18:57:17 GMT -5
It's hilarious to think it just now hit em that Cena/Taker would be a big match. The moment has passed. I mean, likely still a good match, but coulda been HUGE.
What a waste that they didn't get to that earlier.
|
|
Woo
Hank Scorpio
Posts: 5,301
|
Post by Woo on Sept 24, 2015 18:59:49 GMT -5
Not at all. I've heard this argument before about the part-timers not holding back the actual roster and it doesn't hold weight. The reason nobody is being elevated is because they have all these part timers on call they can rely on instead. No, if the WWE wanted to make Owens near Lesnar level they will like they did with Reigns and Rollins. Whether the WWE wants to push any of those 3 guys has nothing to do with Lesnar and more whether the WWE wants them to be top stars or not. If Rock didn't main event those two Wrestlemanias who would have? A main roster guy. If Taker and Brock didn't main event Summerslam who would have? Main roster guys. If Sting wasn't fighting for the title who would have? A main roster guy. The same could be said for Kane. Look at Wrestlemania this year. If you take out Undertaker, Sting, HHH and Lesnar then four guys on the roster not only could have had a Wrestlemania match, but would have had to have a Wrestlemania match.
|
|
|
Post by King (Super) Dragunov on Sept 24, 2015 19:18:23 GMT -5
wow. not only do the current plans suck. the future plans suck too.
please retire. please.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 24, 2015 19:42:35 GMT -5
Cena v Taker HHH v Rollins Brock v someone he can give a career making win to, Ambrose or Reigns are favorites (triple threat for title?) but Cersaro or even Neville or Stardust would be cool too. Owens v Zayn New Day v Rock/Austin
There easy.
|
|
Jeff Mangum PI
Hank Scorpio
11 herbs and spices for the rest of eternity; Is Number Two. Number Two!
The 2nd Coming
Posts: 6,957
|
Post by Jeff Mangum PI on Sept 24, 2015 20:23:57 GMT -5
Just do the Shield triple threat. It's the logical endpoint for Roman, Dean, & Seth's stories, so just get on with it already.
|
|
|
Post by Lazy peon on Sept 24, 2015 20:57:00 GMT -5
Dammit just do Sting vs Taker already. And make it a double retirement match.
And while we're at it, a Big Show vs Kane vs Mark Henry triple retirement match.
|
|
|
Post by Starshine on Sept 24, 2015 21:02:36 GMT -5
If anyone is going to be in the title match, it should be Ambrose. They keep dicking him around in these feuds where he loses despite often being at least twice as over as his opponent. He's more over than Reigns, he's a better wrestler than Reigns, and he's easily a better character than Reigns. He has a heap of merch, so he obviously sells. What's not to like?
|
|
|
Post by idislikeeverything on Sept 24, 2015 21:10:07 GMT -5
If anyone is going to be in the title match, it should be Ambrose. They keep dicking him around in these feuds where he loses despite often being at least twice as over as his opponent. He's more over than Reigns, he's a better wrestler than Reigns, and he's easily a better character than Reigns. He has a heap of merch, so he obviously sells. What's not to like? I am not sure Ambrose is better than Roman in ring. I can't say Ambrose has overly impressed me as an in ring guy outside of hardcore matches.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 24, 2015 21:10:49 GMT -5
There was a perfectly easy way to book a Shield triple threat, but noooooo. We had to give Sheamus the briefcase, didn't we? *grumble* Easily the coolest match they could do. They better not blow it on Raw without any build up.
|
|
|
Post by Beets by Schrute on Sept 24, 2015 21:12:20 GMT -5
If I were Taker, I'd say no to anyone, but Sting.
I second the idea of Ambrose vs Rollins vs Reigns
Batista ought to come back to face Brock
Cena should wrestle Triple H, for some "end the Authority" match or something.
Daniel Bryan should face Sami Zayn
30 man Andre Battle Royal
New Day vs Dudley Boyz vs Hardy Boyz in TLC Match
|
|
mcstoklasa
Hank Scorpio
Sigs/Avatars cannot exceed 1MB
Posts: 6,944
|
Post by mcstoklasa on Sept 24, 2015 21:21:39 GMT -5
Brock v someone he can give a career making win to I think WM32 way too early for that. WM34 should be the place for that, or WM33 at the earliest.
|
|
|
Post by RadcapRadsley on Sept 25, 2015 0:29:27 GMT -5
Remember when they had to build WrestleMania exclusively around guys on the full-time roster? So your telling me instead of Hulk vs Andre at the Silverdome in front of 200,000 people you wouldn't have rather seen Andre win a battle Royale and Hogan face Sammartino or Pedro Morales?
|
|
|
Post by EoE: Well There's Your Problem on Sept 25, 2015 0:53:52 GMT -5
Remember when they had to build WrestleMania exclusively around guys on the full-time roster? So your telling me instead of Hulk vs Andre at the Silverdome in front of 200,000 people you wouldn't have rather seen Andre win a battle Royale and Hogan face Sammartino or Pedro Morales? Funnily enough, Morales was still active in 1987, essentially being in the role that Mark Henry is in today. And he was only a year older then than Big Show is now (43), the same age as Henry is now (44) and FOUR YEARS YOUNGER than #1 Contender to the WWE World Heavyweight Championship Kane is now (48).
|
|
|
Post by Hit Girl on Sept 25, 2015 1:00:53 GMT -5
If they want to do something memorable, have Vince announce his retirement at the start of the show and declare that a new era has begun. The crowd will go apeshit and the post-Mania RAW will be as buzzed as shit.
|
|
Emmet Russell
King Koopa
Quieter
The best wrestler on earth.
Posts: 12,526
|
Post by Emmet Russell on Sept 25, 2015 1:01:23 GMT -5
None of those Taker matches are big enough for the show except for the Cena one.
If they plan on filling the stadium, it's the direction they should be heading in. Send Taker off with the main event at Wrestlemania against the biggest star of the last decade - it's the best thing for him.
Brock and Roman can for the title with Reigns winning this time. I don't think people will be nearly as upset as last year, especially with Taker being in the main event.
|
|
|
Post by Ryushinku on Sept 25, 2015 2:35:54 GMT -5
Cena-Taker would still be really good, but not even a shadow of what it would've been with The Streak on the line. A vast amount of interest is sucked away due to that.
Still, these are all such early plans it's not worth much attention. Even if everyone involved was still fit and available it could just change next month.
|
|