|
Post by IMPRESSIVE knightwing1047 on Jan 1, 2016 22:19:04 GMT -5
I voted European Championship. I like the concept of defending a title only in certain areas. I think it adds a ton of prestige.
But I was torn between that and TV Title. A TV Championship is really cool and would be similar to the US Open Title matches.
Side note: shouldn't the NXT Championship be called the NXT World Championship? It's been defended in England, Japan and the US.
|
|
|
Post by Mighty Attack Tribble on Jan 1, 2016 22:56:34 GMT -5
Side note: shouldn't the NXT Championship be called the NXT World Championship? It's been defended in England, Japan and the US. Since when does WWE care about the definitions of a world title according to PWI?
|
|
|
Post by SCCB Was Told To Do Steroids on Jan 2, 2016 0:05:17 GMT -5
I've changed my vote three times, but I've settled on the WCWTV. They should rechristen it the WWE Social Media belt. It would cover the Network as well.
|
|
|
Post by Ryback on a Pole! on Jan 2, 2016 1:20:25 GMT -5
I loved the Hardcore Title. Was always a fun way to kill 5 minutes or so with a crazy brawl.
Would be a good division to keep the relics like The Dudleys, Kane, Big Show, Dreamer etc so they're out of the way feuding with each other and playing to their strengths of using weapons and stuff. Throw guys like Ambrose, Swagger, Barrett, Owens etc into the division sometimes too.
|
|
|
Post by Sir Woodrow on Jan 2, 2016 1:54:45 GMT -5
I voted TV Title but the more I think about it, the Hardcore belt in the Network era could be fun. Imagine it having the 24/7 rule again & seeing little vignettes between shows at random
|
|
JCBaggee
Hank Scorpio
Writer, streamer. I used to write for CBR but then they fired everyone who cared about their writers
Posts: 6,783
|
Post by JCBaggee on Jan 2, 2016 2:09:00 GMT -5
Bring back the Hardcore Title and every so often instate the 24 hour rule for a week, with random, impromptu matches showing up as Breaking News on the Network.
Note I said every so often. We don't need that nonsense where the 24 hour rule is in effect every day, leading to multiple title reigns in the span of 20 minutes.
|
|
|
Post by Hit Girl on Jan 2, 2016 4:33:30 GMT -5
The Hardcore title
The Wyatts/ECW match from a few weeks back showed it's still compatible with PG WWE, and it works fine.
Don't use the 24/7 rule though. It made it too comical.
|
|
|
Post by Duke Cameron on Jan 2, 2016 6:36:10 GMT -5
Cruiserweight
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 2, 2016 10:45:57 GMT -5
Made for him:
|
|
|
Post by Limity (BLM) on Jan 2, 2016 11:15:35 GMT -5
I was initially going to say European, but I settled on TV title. Make it its own enclosed mini division, with angles and storylines, etc.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 2, 2016 11:23:11 GMT -5
TV Title Storyline:
Dolph Ziggler as champion. Walks by Ryder.
Dolph: "Hey Zack, what's up". Zack: "Nothing much Dolph, just at catering, you know what, how about you give me a shot at the TV title broski?" Dolph: "Sure, but wait, you don't even get on TV bro. Woo, woo, woo, you know it, right?" Zack: "F***"
|
|
|
Post by DJ Maniak on Jan 2, 2016 23:03:01 GMT -5
Voted Hardcore: Seems to be the only one they could only do something different with, not necessarily new.
As for a TV title, I created one in WWE2K16 for NXT (Just the NXT title cast in silver) so that show would have another minor title for my roster to feud over. I think Tommaso Ciampa has it at the moment in Universe mode.
|
|
thecrusherwi
El Dandy
the Financially Responsible Man
Brawl For All
Posts: 7,656
|
Post by thecrusherwi on Jan 2, 2016 23:14:49 GMT -5
I never quite understood the TV title. Does it make you the champion of TV? Can it only be defended on TV? With how much TV there has been since the mid 90s, what makes it any different than the other belts?
With all of those questions still on the table, I voted for the TV Title.
|
|
|
Post by RI Richmark on Jan 2, 2016 23:41:19 GMT -5
I never quite understood the TV title. Does it make you the champion of TV? Can it only be defended on TV? With how much TV there has been since the mid 90s, what makes it any different than the other belts? With all of those questions still on the table, I voted for the TV Title. I'm thinking that it was to promote interest in televised cards back in the days when many such cards consisted mostly of jobber squashes but I may be wrong on that.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 3, 2016 6:35:19 GMT -5
I voted Crusierweight. The WWE is never gonna to do proper hardcore matches on a regular basis so no point bringing that back. The European and TV titles, they don't make the IC and US titles worth anything so they'd be worth even less and the women's title would just be a name change of the divas
The Crusierweight title could allow some of the smaller guys who the WWE will never allow near the other titles something to do
|
|
DragonMasterP
King Koopa
Wait, I turned 30? How'd that happen?
Posts: 11,987
|
Post by DragonMasterP on Jan 3, 2016 9:33:21 GMT -5
I voted Hardcore championship, because a match for it'd often be a bright spot on a dreadful Raw.
|
|
|
Post by MrElijah on Jan 3, 2016 10:12:30 GMT -5
I never quite understood the TV title. Does it make you the champion of TV? Can it only be defended on TV? With how much TV there has been since the mid 90s, what makes it any different than the other belts? With all of those questions still on the table, I voted for the TV Title. The main gimmick was the time limit, 15-20 mins. It was used as a great heat tool for heels. When Dusty had it, it became the World Television Championship. It made for interesting Title for Title matches(ie. The TV title time limit is on) If they ever bring it back, the should use the '86-'92 belt. That thing was beautiful.
|
|
thecrusherwi
El Dandy
the Financially Responsible Man
Brawl For All
Posts: 7,656
|
Post by thecrusherwi on Jan 3, 2016 10:53:03 GMT -5
I never quite understood the TV title. Does it make you the champion of TV? Can it only be defended on TV? With how much TV there has been since the mid 90s, what makes it any different than the other belts? With all of those questions still on the table, I voted for the TV Title. The main gimmick was the time limit, 15-20 mins. It was used as a great heat tool for heels. When Dusty had it, it became the World Television Championship. It made for interesting Title for Title matches(ie. The TV title time limit is on) If they ever bring it back, the should use the '86-'92 belt. That thing was beautiful. Ah that's right. I forgot about that. I've been watching mostly Monday Night War era stuff lately where they had dropped the time limit mentions completely. I hated Lord Steven Regal as a kid for abusing that stipulation.
|
|
|
Post by Hickster on Jan 3, 2016 14:13:28 GMT -5
Tv title, have Heath Slater pin Jim Duggan and hold his legends contract hostage until he returns the belt that Scott Hall threw in the trash.
|
|
|
Post by Mighty Attack Tribble on Jan 3, 2016 16:25:49 GMT -5
The Crusierweight title could allow some of the smaller guys who the WWE will never allow near the other titles something to do And leave the bigger guys who WWE will never allow near the other titles with nothing to do. If you're bringing back a lower-tier title, make it one available to all the lower-tier.
|
|