Abdullah
Hank Scorpio
Thank you, Ishmeal Loves Bayley!
Posts: 6,420
|
Post by Abdullah on Jan 30, 2016 5:03:41 GMT -5
This claim set off a ton of anger among 'Lucha' fans and the accusation boils down to: 'WWE won't book these guys well. They'll just sit on them so that other companies can't benefit from their talent.' With the fury of acquisitions recently, and more to come, and knowing that WWE has approached Angelico, Jack Evans and Ricochet, it's an interesting question. Does Triple H really want to assemble the best roster in history or is that merely a stated goal where the actual aim is to crush competition?
Look, I don't think WWE are going to sit on any of the big names they've signed. Owens is doing really well. Neville and Kalisto are doing okay. They've done less than Owens but they're both less than a year into their run. There is actually more of a case to be made that WWE can't make their own male stars. They need guys with indie hype, they need guys with a built-in loyal fanbase that will keep cheering when their favorites lose and cheer even harder when their favorites start getting a push. It would be more true to say that WWE is now accepting talent that are already stars so that they don't have to book them from scratch.
They let Doc Gallows go but he's now more valuable to them because another company had the time to book him well. They lowballed AJ numerous times until his work in another companies made his star power undeniable. These are just a few examples.
WWE's motives for bringing big name talent is that they're smart and lazy in equal measure. But I'm curious to hear what FAN has to say about this producer's claims.
|
|
|
Post by Session Moth is over on Jan 30, 2016 5:53:51 GMT -5
Fan's logic:
1. WWE does not sign indy talent:
"WWE has no respect for the indys. They refuse to sign amazing indy talent because they would overshadow WWE homegrown stars. Why won't WWE give the top jobs to the talent that deserve it?"
2. WWE sign loads of big indy talent over a few years. These guys win World titles and play a big part in WWE storylines:
"Look at the evil WWE, how dare they sign all the best indy talent, trying to put all these great small companies out of business"
|
|
|
Post by Bungle on Jan 30, 2016 5:59:01 GMT -5
WWE wants the best roster and talent possible
Is that simple.
|
|
Goon
AC Slater
Posts: 219
|
Post by Goon on Jan 30, 2016 6:02:06 GMT -5
1) Sounds like a LU executive trying to pander to the parts of the IWC that eat up everything anti-WWE.
2) I actually believe HHH, that he wants to assemble the best roster, keeping competition small is a nice side-effect. I doubt he wants to actually destroy competition, though, he needs them as farm leagues / unofficial pre-developmental after all.
|
|
|
Post by Ruthless Pessimism on Jan 30, 2016 6:06:37 GMT -5
Assemble a solid roster...or crush the competition?
Why not both?
|
|
anglarite
Don Corleone
...enchantment!
Posts: 1,545
|
Post by anglarite on Jan 30, 2016 6:11:02 GMT -5
Neither, they just need talented wrestlers who they can use then to make their hand-picked main eventers make look good.
|
|
gr1990
Don Corleone
Posts: 1,485
|
Post by gr1990 on Jan 30, 2016 6:38:53 GMT -5
They have no competition, and the NXT pay isn't good enough that everyone will desert the indies if they know that WWE are just stockpiling talent and they'll never get on TV, or they'll sign in the hope of being one of the few that make it, get bored when WWE does nothing with them, ask to leave and return to whence they came. WWE controlling all of wrestling and having every top wrestler in the world under their umbrella is a financial and logistical impossibility at this point in time. It also seems jarring while Vince is still on top and would still rather push homegrown hosses as top guys.
But it is crazy how only five years ago they were pretending they had nothing to do with the other wrestling that goes on in the world, because they're A. sports-entertainment and B. bigger than everyone else and therefore all that matters. If you'd told fans in 2011 when Bryan and Kaval for going through the wringer that WWE would be signing people who have become stars in ROH, TNA and New Japan and treating them like royalty rather than jobbing them out for their first few months to remind them they're 'just another rookie' and what they did in the bush leagues doesn't matter, they wouldn't have believed you. It actually makes the indies seem more prestigious and makes them more visible to the casual fan, so far I'd say NXT has only benefited smaller companies.
|
|
|
Post by Mid-Carder on Jan 30, 2016 6:41:10 GMT -5
WWE really can't win. This is what people wanted for years.
|
|
|
Post by ritt works hard fo da chickens on Jan 30, 2016 7:00:02 GMT -5
You cannot buy up all the talent. You can buy all the ready talent. However, that actually helps because it forces turnover and stagnation is what kills promotions. It hurts short term, but in the long run it will separate the actual good promotions and trainers from those who are propped up by conveniently having a couple good talents.
|
|
Burst
El Dandy
*inarticulate squawking*
Posts: 8,599
|
Post by Burst on Jan 30, 2016 7:20:44 GMT -5
But it is crazy how only five years ago they were pretending they had nothing to do with the other wrestling that goes on in the world, because they're A. sports-entertainment and B. bigger than everyone else and therefore all that matters. If you'd told fans in 2011 when Bryan and Kaval for going through the wringer that WWE would be signing people who have become stars in ROH, TNA and New Japan and treating them like royalty rather than jobbing them out for their first few months to remind them they're 'just another rookie' and what they did in the bush leagues doesn't matter, they wouldn't have believed you. Tell that to Lawler; I get that he's supposed to be a heel commentator now, but it was cringeworthy hearing him flat out more or less say "It doesn't matter what you did before the WWE, you have to start from nothing here" during Styles vs. Axel. Granted, a lot of that was because the other commentators did nothing to counter him like a JR or Gorilla Monsoon would have, but still.
|
|
Push R Truth
Patti Mayonnaise
Unique and Special Snowflake, and a pants-less heathen.
Perpetually Constipated
Posts: 39,310
|
Post by Push R Truth on Jan 30, 2016 7:23:38 GMT -5
Stupid question: When did giving people good enough deals to leave their current job become "sinister"?
I thought it was just good business.
|
|
|
Post by Zombie Mod on Jan 30, 2016 8:10:01 GMT -5
I always thought their overwhelming desire to make money was a bit sinister
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2016 8:16:55 GMT -5
No.
|
|
|
Post by ________ has left the building on Jan 30, 2016 8:34:57 GMT -5
WWE cannot sign all of the talent that is out there. And people seem to forget that the talent pool keeps replenishing and revitalizing itself. The curtain jerker in some small indy in a couple of years will be the biggest indy person like numerous others. Cederick Alexander could wind up being the next top prospect. Or it could be Donovan Dijak. I don't doubt WWE is not looking to have most of the top talents under their house. But in a lot of those cases, they are calling WWE like Nakamura did. The only things that changed is how WWE does its hiring and booking. Small standouts are no longer locked out. Big in Japan is no longer the Too Asian.
In LU's case, most of their roster is getting their big break to a wider audience with the show. Folks already knew about Jack Evans but Angelico is totally new to those who don't follow lucha libre. Same for Pentagon Jr. King Cuerno actually was on WWE's radar years ago round by the same time they were scouting Alberto Del Rio. CMLL though kept him locked in his contract and booked him like crap to make him unappealing to WWE. It's the ECW effect. People who were unknkown or casted off looking like superstars with good booking and strong matches. Which leads to other companies looking to hire them and the company that made those folks look good having to fight to keep them. Nature of the beast.
|
|
|
Post by aka Cthulhu on Jan 30, 2016 8:44:16 GMT -5
When it said sinister motives, I was expecting stuff like sacrificing wrestlers to some sort of alien elder god.
|
|
|
Post by EoE: Well There's Your Problem on Jan 30, 2016 8:51:16 GMT -5
When it said sinister motives, I was expecting stuff like sacrificing wrestlers to some sort of alien elder god. Well, Triple H IS in his mid 40s now...
|
|
|
Post by 01010010 01101001 01100011 on Jan 30, 2016 8:52:55 GMT -5
Assemble a solid roster...or crush the competition?
Why not both? Exactly. If I can strengthen my brand and weaken yours in one move, what is the downside to me?
|
|
saintpat
El Dandy
Release the hounds!!!
Posts: 7,664
|
Post by saintpat on Jan 30, 2016 16:30:14 GMT -5
I thought LU had talent signed to 7-year rollover deals that kept them under contract as long as the show wasn't cancelled.
|
|
JCBaggee
Hank Scorpio
Writer, streamer. I used to write for CBR but then they fired everyone who cared about their writers
Posts: 6,788
|
Post by JCBaggee on Jan 30, 2016 16:32:12 GMT -5
Wait, what? You mean WWE is a business, operating in practices to guarantee it's long term survival? I was positive Vince was just running a charity pony show every week.
|
|
Dub H
Crow T. Robot
Captain Pixel: the Game Master
I ❤ Aniki
Posts: 47,911
|
Post by Dub H on Jan 30, 2016 16:38:39 GMT -5
i'm sure entire roster is an overreaction,which brings the question of who they tried to sign
Besides Ol' Berto.
|
|