Heartbreaker
King Koopa
Is actually Bindi Irwin
RIP Punk's media scrum, Page 54, Muffins, Biting People Bad™ (2022 - 2022)
Posts: 11,846
|
Post by Heartbreaker on Feb 21, 2016 23:49:04 GMT -5
I wish there was real competition for the WWE. Then they probably wouldn't do this shit anymore. Could you imagine how ****ed WWE would have been in 1997 if they dropped the ball on Steve Austin in favour for example: Mark Henry?
|
|
|
Post by Error on Feb 21, 2016 23:56:40 GMT -5
And he works when booked like a HHH guy. Just that doesn't happen when Vince is around. The problem is NOT the person pushed, it is the person booking it. eh,the problem is both Dude has been massively over at times so I don't think so. Yeah there is a portion of the audience that does not like Roman, but everyone has that. Not everyone can have Philly or LA or Boston or Dallas or New York cheering for them like Roman has gotten at times.
|
|
Dub H
Crow T. Robot
Captain Pixel: the Game Master
I ❤ Aniki
Posts: 47,960
|
Post by Dub H on Feb 21, 2016 23:58:10 GMT -5
Dude has been massively over at times so I don't think so. Yeah there is a portion of the audience that does not like Roman, but everyone has that. Not everyone can have Philly or LA or Boston or Dallas or New York cheering for them like Roman has gotten at times. It is one of these cases,he will be good,he will be over,but there will always be an amount of better people and it will stand out. main eventer?Yeh absolutely,but not THE GUY
|
|
|
Post by Error on Feb 22, 2016 0:03:25 GMT -5
Dude has been massively over at times so I don't think so. Yeah there is a portion of the audience that does not like Roman, but everyone has that. Not everyone can have Philly or LA or Boston or Dallas or New York cheering for them like Roman has gotten at times. It is one of these cases,he will be good,he will be over,but there will always be an amount of better people and it will stand out. main eventer?Yeh absolutely,but not THE GUY Yeah, I don't see him in that mold of a guy you build around but he is someone that should be a main eventer. More of an Orton than a Cena I guess.
|
|
|
Post by bootytea on Feb 22, 2016 0:07:09 GMT -5
Dean has a long way to go before being able to main event a Wrestlemania, the same with Roman.
With that in mind, I would actually prefer to see Roman because I feel they would gel much better in the ring. I'm honestly not even going to watch Wrestlemania at this point, but I do feel Dean's match with Triple H would actually be worse.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 22, 2016 0:15:40 GMT -5
I dunno. It's all relative to me. This isn't a Daniel Bryan situation where Ambrose is the obvious Mania main eventer this year, certainly would be less boos but I don't know from a box office perspective if it would have made much of a difference. Daniel Bryan in 2014 was the obvious choice for Wrestlemania and WWE were completely pigheaded not to see it. This year Ambrose is not an obvious answer, there's no clear answer for who should main event Wrestlemania, and you can probably thank this Roman Reigns push for that, but in lieu of anything else they might as well finish what they started.
|
|
Sparkybob
King Koopa
I have a status?
Posts: 10,994
|
Post by Sparkybob on Feb 22, 2016 0:20:32 GMT -5
I dunno. It's all relative to me. This isn't a Daniel Bryan situation where Ambrose is the obvious Mania main eventer this year, certainly would be less boos but I don't know from a box office perspective if it would have made much of a difference. Daniel Bryan in 2014 was the obvious choice for Wrestlemania and WWE were completely pigheaded not to see it. This year Ambrose is not an obvious answer, there's no clear answer for who should main event Wrestlemania, and you can probably thank this Roman Reigns push for that, but in lieu of anything else they might as well finish what they started. Yea Ambrose doesn't have the resume of someone like Bryan to say he's the obvious choice for the main event. Also Roman in 2016 is much more prepared than Roman in 2015 is to have a great match.
|
|
|
Post by Tea & Crumpets on Feb 22, 2016 12:11:10 GMT -5
Whats worse is the guy they chose to have this big blood feud with HHH heading to Mania? They just quietly stare at each other to end the show F***ing what now? Wasn't this the dude who you basically tore apart just a few months back? Didn't give a shit what you did to him? And now he's just in the ring parading his title and all you do is stare at him? What a F***ing joke, this literally is a F***ing joke, and it's on us for wanting Ambrose to achieve something or this company to do something different... and then end it on the most bland, predictable, and overall depressing note ever. What an absolute DUMPSTER FIRE... Mania deserves to get shit on, and so does everyone involved with this... What do you mean that isn't intense and badass? This is THE BIG DAWG ROMAN REIGNS, he whose legendary tug of war over the title with Lesnar last year was a moment as iconic and rebellious as Austin's brawl with Tyson. BELEE DAT.
|
|
|
Post by corndog on Feb 22, 2016 12:44:50 GMT -5
Getting people's hopes up by having Ambrose lose the IC title on the final Raw before the show was a bit of a crappy move in hindsight. In the poll thread on what we want to happen at Fastlane and what will happen at Fastlane, I made a big point about this. They booked the triple threat match completely around Ambrose and I said if he loses and Reigns wins, which both happened, it would cause an even bigger backlash than if the match was revolved around Reigns. Ambrose losing the IC title made him a believable winner. This was some very foolish booking unless they are planning on turning one heel and honestly I think if they turn Ambrose now, he will get cheered.
|
|